You called him histrionic,
I didn't diagnose him with "Histrionic Personality Disorder". I simply described his response towards Palpatine as histrionic. Massive difference here. Not even in the same ballpark. It is no different than saying "that's crazy talk" or "you're being silly".
But that's besides the point. At no time did I discount his career. A long synopsis of his work was simply not needed and felt extremely ostentatious (yes, another descriptive adjective and not a diagnosis of your character).
Go back and re-read his extraordinary contributions to this site from Bill Turner over the years.
Not needed. With all due respect, his career was never once questioned. Only the one response on this thread.
Far more patience than some around these parts show by looking down their proverbial noses at the outsiders and enthusiasts who just want to be a part of the magic, one way or another.
Respectfully, in my opinion, that behavior wasn't exactly shown at this time. There was no correction or rebuttal. Just an accusation of "hate". Now of course, I'm not saying people should be judged by snapshots of their life. I simply, and respectfully, disagree with the use of the word "hate". Using the word "hate" around discussions of religion is akin to calling someone a bigot in today's societal climate. We all know that.
It's definitely not in the same realm as using "histrionic" as an adjective to describe someone's reaction. That's for sure.
Now, sir, I do have a "mental disorder" and its called Aspergers, or at least it was called that when I was diagnosed as a child. Now, because society wants to sugar coat everything, it's termed AD, and I have a set of initials for that, namely WTF. I do not have an attention deficit, quite the opposite, actually. As the Waterboy's mama once said, I don't have what's called the social skills. I may hurt someone's feelings and not even realize it.
I'm sorry to hear that, but this discourse is way more off-topic than I'm comfortable with. Your personal health should be just that;
personal.
You didn't attack his career, but you did his character and his respected name. I was offended for him, and therefore spoke out against your attack.
I sincerely hope the irony is not lost on you. Remember, a serious accusation of "hate" is what started this discussion.
I'm happy to have that discussion with you. Start a thread on the National part of this website, and you'll see the participant with the yellow rose avatar chiming into the conversation. I agree that everyone that receives money from listener donations, pledge drives, or even the passing of a collection plate during the Sunday morning service, should be taxed accordingly. That includes, EMF, PBS, NPR, and on and on and on. I don't care on which side of the political or religious spectrum your "non-profit" operates, if you are hustling money from your followers, you need to pay taxes on that inflow of money. However, this particular thread, within the Houston forum, is not the place to have that discussion, and I've already spoken too much on the subject now.
I spoke my peace
back a piece (to the disdain of so many you). You're welcome to revisit that thread and point out anything you take issue with.
The only hairs being split is by your own razor. Palpatine's message was apparently taken by most here, exactly as it was intended.
As "Hate"? Common now! Besides the fact that calling something a "scam" isn't "hate", it is disingenuous (another adjective, not a diagnosis) to use that word when talking about religion given the strong negative connotations it carries.
If you can't read between lines, as to the intent of his words, that is your own blindness.
Maybe there isn't any lines to read. I'm a moderately religious person, yet I tend to agree that certain religious broadcasters (not naming any in particular) are scamming gullible people.
Am I full of "hate" as well?
You seem to want people like Bill Turner to bend and reconstruct their vocabulary to appease you and your feelings,
Again, I
really hope the irony isn't lost on you. Remember, Palpatine's post (and this discussion to a certain extent) is the one hurt some of y'all's feelings.
If Bill wants to stand by his statement, then he has that right to do so. But I will continue to stand by my statement that the use of the word "hate" is simply overkill and irresponsible given the current "social justice" climate. The fact that you can't leave my criticism be makes you guilty of wanting
"people...to bend and reconstruct their vocabulary to appease you and your feelings"...as you so adequately put it.
😁
or fall in line with your "modern" way of thinking. All I can say in response is good luck with that, sir. You may wish to visit Fort Cavazos near Killeen, see a football game at Rose Stadium in east Texas, between the Tyler Lions and the Legacy Red Raiders, or traverse down Emancipation Avenue en route to an Astros baseball game in Houston, but Texans like us will always refer to them as Fort Hood, the John Tyler Lions and Robert E. Lee Rebels, and Dowling Street, respectively. The history will only die when we do.
I have no idea what any of this has to do with the topic at hand. But I will say that celebrating the confederate
TRAITORS and
LOSERS is not the "flex" you think it is, nor is it relevant to our discussion.
Again, with all due respect, of course.