lance is one of the only sites i pay for in the broadcast industry, its more than worth itWith some paywalls you can go to 12ft – Hop any paywall, paste the link and remove them, not RadioInsight's though.
lance is one of the only sites i pay for in the broadcast industry, its more than worth itWith some paywalls you can go to 12ft – Hop any paywall, paste the link and remove them, not RadioInsight's though.
Yep.Nah, I’m good. I’d rather pay Lance $5/month for info than infect my computer/phone with viruses from a sketchy site because ‘I’m too cheap and selfish.’
While harsh, I agree.(And to second Lance’s comment, it’s comments like yours that ruin a service for everybody.)
Moderator: I was questioning deleting this post as encouragement for an unethical practice. But then I thought "let me comment instead".With some paywalls you can go to xxxxxx, paste the link and remove them, not RadioInsight's though.
Edited to remove the link. Warning: Any further suggestion on stealing a paid service will result in your permanent ban. THIS IS ILLEGAL.With some paywalls you can go to xxxxxx paste the link and remove them, not RadioInsight's though.
Ignore Lance's scoops at your own peril. If you see smoke on RadioInsight, expect fire to follow. I'm still watching for publicly announced news and assuming nothing. My hunch is that ESPN will be kicked to the curb in favor of an iHeart-syndicated alternative, Fox Sports Radio. An iHeart station running ESPN Radio always seemed odd to me.I'm going to assume that there is nothing of truth to this story since it was only reported by one source and there has been nothing new since.
I would assume that there would be other leaks by now is there was something here. You can't keep something like this quiet.Ignore Lance's scoops at your own peril. If you see smoke on RadioInsight, expect fire to follow. I'm still watching for publicly announced news and assuming nothing.
I'm going to assume that there is nothing of truth to this story since it was only reported by one source and there has been nothing new since.
So what station will fill the sports talk vacuum in Hartford if they flip ESPN Radio.LOL Spoken like someone whos n ever read Lances stuff
I've paid for his site for a few years now, and when he posts potential format changes or other juicy news... hes at bare minimum on 3rd base, if not already on his way to homeplate and about to make a home run
Plus, where else are you going to see this? AllAccess doesnt cover radio news either, fybush.com sometimes cover format changes if theres concrete evidence coming and insideradio.com doesnt really cover this kinda thing.
So what station will fill the sports talk vacuum in Hartford if they flip ESPN Radio.
So if the news is that big why has it not been reported elsewhere.I dont remember what the article says and if its behind a paywall, im not spilling the beans.
So if the news is that big why has it not been reported elsewhere.
Because other publications tend to not have the connections/sources Lance has.So if the news is that big why has it not been reported elsewhere.
And because mainstream media in cities like Hartford don't have anyone covering the radio beat, or enough general assignment reporters to take someone away from crime and politics to check out a rumor about a radio station with few listeners. If WUCS changes format, that may get a story. Flipping from ESPN to Fox for national sports talk (itself a ratings killer on any sports station with local content in other day parts) would likely get nothing, as it's only of interest to people in the industry and radio geeks.Because other publications tend to not have the connections/sources Lance has.
What would WUCS gain in switching formats, be it another sports talk or something else. Their signal is not going to change. The market is not going to change.And because mainstream media in cities like Hartford don't have anyone covering the radio beat, or enough general assignment reporters to take someone away from crime and politics to check out a rumor about a radio station with few listeners. If WUCS changes format, that may get a story. Flipping from ESPN to Fox for national sports talk (itself a ratings killer on any sports station with local content in other day parts) would likely get nothing, as it's only of interest to people in the industry and radio geeks.
That's why I'm leaning toward an ESPN/Fox switch. IHeart isn't going to put right-wing talker WPOP on 97.9, there's no musical format hole screaming to be filled, and niche sub-formats like classic hip-hop and classic country wouldn't attract enough advertising to matter.What would WUCS gain in switching formats, be it another sports talk or something else. Their signal is not going to change. The market is not going to change.
Would Fox Sports radio have enough better programming vs ESPN Radio.That's why I'm leaning toward an ESPN/Fox switch. IHeart isn't going to put right-wing talker WPOP on 97.9, there's no musical format hole screaming to be filled, and niche sub-formats like classic hip-hop and classic country wouldn't attract enough advertising to matter.
Doesn't matter. The ESPN talk programming is filler, with much of the advertising revenue going not to WUCS but to iHeart. What WUCS has to sell is Rob Dibble in PM drive and its various play-by-play properties.Would Fox Sports radio have enough better programming vs ESPN Radio.
They might also ask for more money from affiliatesESPN is alot more demanding of affiliates,. iirc.. on how much of the network they have to carry and etc