I never understood how they could get by with giving it an almost-identical name ("TV-Guide", with a hyphen), but I guess AFN got a pass on that one (or possibly had an agreement with TV Guide to use the name, slightly tweaked, with different logo and layout). It would be a name familiar to American service personnel and their families, and they obviously wouldn't be getting the "real" TV Guide in Europe and Asia.
Most people on this board probably know this, but AFN took American programs from various networks, running obviously out of pattern, and overlaid the commercials with PSAs and military-themed content. This is similar to the ARCS network in Alaska, same concept, different target audience, but ARCS runs Anchorage-originated programming with the commercials intact. Might be simpler merely to run four or five subchannels on each transmitter as de facto translators of the Anchorage stations.
Just out of curiosity, would the AFN stations have had that much of a signal spillover outside the military bases they served? Also, it was common for military personnel to have multi-system receivers, so that they could get channels from the home country as well (albeit in the home language, which few would have understood unless the bases were in the UK). A friend of mine who had served as a civilian employee in Kaiserslautern swore up and down that the only difference was in the voltage, she could not comprehend the concept of PAL and SECAM, in spite of my explaining it to her.
Most people on this board probably know this, but AFN took American programs from various networks, running obviously out of pattern, and overlaid the commercials with PSAs and military-themed content. This is similar to the ARCS network in Alaska, same concept, different target audience, but ARCS runs Anchorage-originated programming with the commercials intact. Might be simpler merely to run four or five subchannels on each transmitter as de facto translators of the Anchorage stations.
Just out of curiosity, would the AFN stations have had that much of a signal spillover outside the military bases they served? Also, it was common for military personnel to have multi-system receivers, so that they could get channels from the home country as well (albeit in the home language, which few would have understood unless the bases were in the UK). A friend of mine who had served as a civilian employee in Kaiserslautern swore up and down that the only difference was in the voltage, she could not comprehend the concept of PAL and SECAM, in spite of my explaining it to her.
