What became of Philadelphia?Better map from @Michi 's FCCdata.org site, showing the geography:
View attachment 7656
Apparently the target demo includes seagulls and various ocean life. 🤯
What became of Philadelphia?Better map from @Michi 's FCCdata.org site, showing the geography:
View attachment 7656
Apparently the target demo includes seagulls and various ocean life. 🤯
1080 in Hartford?What is being protected to the northeast? Second-adjacent WBZ?
Third-adjacent is never protected. No receiver is so poor as to be unable to separate stations 30 kilohertz apart. I'm thinking maybe it was the 1070 in Moncton, New Brunswick along with WBZ at 1030 that was of concern to the northeast of NYC.1080 in Hartford?
I'd rather think the reason why the coverage is worse towards the northeast is that the ground conductivity of the land is poorer than the conductivity of the sea. The eastern end of Long Island is also outside of the contour.What is being protected to the northeast? Second-adjacent WBZ?
The actual antenna pattern (from FCCInfo) doesn't have a deep null to the northeast, unlike the null to the southwest which is deep.
Do you mean fccdata.org?I would like to again make the point that the maps from FCCInfo.com lack the geographic points of reference that the ones at Michi's FCCinfo.org have, which makes it much easier to discuss things like this. Her maps are drawn using the licensed parameters, just like the ones at Cavell/Mertz.
Do you mean fccdata.org?