• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Joe Rogan Podcast

I also think Kamala was doing a balancing act between the more conservative edge of the party (Liz Cheney and to a lesser degree Tim Walz) and the more liberal faction of the party (AOC, Bernie) and didn't want to tip the scale and be super friendly with someone who in the past has disparaged some of her voting block like Rogan or that she agrees or leans towards what he is selling. I think it's different than in the past going on something like Leno which had more of a general audience in the past.
I honestly think you are overcomplicating things. She did not want to have an unscripted conversation...period. This wasn't something specific to this particular podcast. This has been the standard operating procedure for her campaign all along. It really reinforced the perception (right or wrong) that people really didn't know who she was. Compound that with the failure to address (or actively marginalize) issues that were of primary concern to the electorate, along with an overemphasis of "identity politics", and that brings you to where we are today. The frustrating part is that all of these so called "experts" are coming out of the woodwork now to say where Kamala, her campaign, and the democrats got it wrong. Where was this "sage advice" before the election...when it could have actually been useful?
 
I honestly think you are overcomplicating things. She did not want to have an unscripted conversation...period. This wasn't something specific to this particular podcast. This has been the standard operating procedure for her campaign all along. It really reinforced the perception (right or wrong) that people really didn't know who she was.

And I think part of that is because she inherited a lot of her staff from the Biden campaign, and they would never have sent him anywhere without a teleprompter and a big jar of Wite-Out. They started with a strategy, and did not change it much when the Big Swap happened.

A consideration from history: I don't recall Oprah having candidates for office on her show, or older television gabfests like Sally Jesse Raphael or Regis & Kathie Lee. Do I mis-remember?
 
I honestly think you are overcomplicating things. She did not want to have an unscripted conversation...period. This wasn't something specific to this particular podcast. This has been the standard operating procedure for her campaign all along. It really reinforced the perception (right or wrong) that people really didn't know who she was. Compound that with the failure to address (or actively marginalize) issues that were of primary concern to the electorate, along with an overemphasis of "identity politics", and that brings you to where we are today. The frustrating part is that all of these so called "experts" are coming out of the woodwork now to say where Kamala, her campaign, and the democrats got it wrong. Where was this "sage advice" before the election...when it could have actually been useful?
I didn't see that much identity politics this time around.
 
From the Inside Radio piece:

> Politically, 35% of listeners identify as Independent or “something else,” while 32% align with Republicans, and 27% align with Democrats.

It should be noted, this is only a few points different than the partisan makeup of the United States.

From Pew Research Center early this year:
35% independent/other, 33% Democrats, 32% Republicans.


So it isn't really accurate to say that Mr. Rogan's show appeals only to one party or another.
 
So it isn't really accurate to say that Mr. Rogan's show appeals only to one party or another.
Rogan used to be a lot more moderate, even liberal on most social issues. In 2020 he endorsed Bernie Sanders. And now he agrees with the far left that Israel's war in Gaza is a genocide. So probably a lot of Democrats listen to him out of habit and familiarity, and for the few points of common ground they may have, even if they no longer agree with most of his political views.
 
Rogan used to be a lot more moderate, even liberal on most social issues.
The point wasn't so much about Mr. Rogan's views.

Earlier in this thread, some posters asserted that Rogan's audience was in the tank for the GOP like the show is Limbaugh noveaux, but the data suggests otherwise.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom