• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

iHeartRadio - "Guaranteed Human."

Since you brought it up, iHeart has trademarked the slogan. I'm not kidding. Look it up.

The fact is that the real promoters of AI in broadcasting aren't big radio companies like iHeart. They're signatories of contracts with SAG-AFTRA, who went on strike against the movie studios on the very issue of AI. The unions are the ones who want to preserve human jobs. Non-union companies are the ones that will replace humans with AI. So if you want to preserve humans in broadcasting, support your local union.
 
iHeart is unveiling a new company-wide slogan on Monday.

Market research showed how much people claim they distrust AI right now. This is their solution.

So is this really about a company that cares about its human talent, or will they be out the door as soon as the market research tells them it won't hurt their corporate image anymore to replace the humans with AI? Wait, don't answer that. My robot vacuum already knows the answer and it sucks.
 
The marriage of Tik Tok Radio and iHeart is in the works. This paragraph from Sean Ross sums up what to expect. OTA Tik Tok radio on broadcast frequencies, and iHeart platform on Tik Tok with PPM encoding.

The iHeart/TikTok deal is potentially a great thing for radio on the specific condition that it makes iHeart’s broadcast stations available on the TikTok app itself, and that those stations, including iHR’s planned “TikTok Radio,” are encoded for PPM and help increase broadcast radio’s usage. (iHR’s release talks about having TikTok radio on broadcast frequencies, which would presumably make it eligible to encode.)

Full article:

 
Here's a view about AI & radio from former KLOS PD: Keith Cunningham:


He's right about one thing: We're already using AI right now. It's not the future. It's now.
Very interesting link. I find the AI analysis of the song’s playability to reflect what a good PD or MD considers, but with a bigger “dose” of logic.

The key element is that a human has to consider the pros and cons and make a decision. AI is not picking the songs, it is presenting a full set of considerations for a human to base their decision on.

The best use of AI is to provide a full data set for evaluation. In particular, it gives data without the influence of personal taste of the program staff, often an impediment to the right decisions.
 
The marriage of Tik Tok Radio and iHeart is in the works. This paragraph from Sean Ross sums up what to expect. OTA Tik Tok radio on broadcast frequencies, and iHeart platform on Tik Tok with PPM encoding.

The iHeart/TikTok deal is potentially a great thing for radio on the specific condition that it makes iHeart’s broadcast stations available on the TikTok app itself, and that those stations, including iHR’s planned “TikTok Radio,” are encoded for PPM and help increase broadcast radio’s usage. (iHR’s release talks about having TikTok radio on broadcast frequencies, which would presumably make it eligible to encode.)

Full article:

Yes! Radio is saved!
 
He's right about one thing: We're already using AI right now. It's not the future. It's now.

They use AI to flag workers to be laid off. That's not restricted to radio. all big companies are on that bandwagon. The big HR software packages like Workday are all-in on AI for everything including hiring, firing, employee monitoring, performance assessments, etc.
 
The best use of AI is to provide a full data set for evaluation. In particular, it gives data without the influence of personal taste of the program staff, often an impediment to the right decisions.
BUT there's influence of the personal taste of the programmer(s) who sets the algorithm of the AI. Unless there's ANOTHER A.I. programming the radio A.I. but than going to be a circular loop of an A.I. telling an A.I. to tell an A.I. to............you get the picture.
 
BUT there's influence of the personal taste of the programmer(s) who sets the algorithm of the AI. Unless there's ANOTHER A.I. programming the radio A.I. but than going to be a circular loop of an A.I. telling an A.I. to tell an A.I. to............you get the picture.
This is what many don’t grasp about AI, as they think humans will ultimately still be running things. Much more likely the AI will run itself, without any humans involved.

We are heading into a world where humans are becoming increasingly unnecessary and irrelevant.
 
This is what many don’t grasp about AI, as they think humans will ultimately still be running things. Much more likely the AI will run itself, without any humans involved. We are heading into a world where humans are becoming increasingly unnecessary and irrelevant.

It sounds like you want mandated employment.
 
It sounds like you want mandated employment.
Where did you get that idea? I never said any such thing.

In the broadest terms, human existence has involved the use of tools to improve life. This ranges from a sharpened rock or shaped wood to the most sophisticated computers and elaborate machinery. Whatever the “level of technology” humans were always the ones in charge and using those tools.

The difference with AI is that the tools will now be using themselves. No human intervention or control is necessary. Ai will be running AI, or in computer terms, AI will be self hosting. Humans are unnecessary.🫥🫥🫥

I find it amusing how those on the political right are pushing for huge levels of population increase at a time when humans are being replaced by AI. More humans doing what? Running the AI? The AI will be running itself. Robots will be building other robots. What do we need people for?🤣🤣🤣
 
The difference with AI is that the tools will now be using themselves. No human intervention or control is necessary.

This entire situation was imagined over 50 years ago


2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1968.

Somebody has to plug it in. Somebody has to program it. There is a role for humans in the process. I used AI to find the link to that article.

Stop worrying. People adapt. Radio used to pay people to cue up records. Not anymore. Did the world fall apart? No.
 
This entire situation was imagined over 50 years ago


2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1968.
HAL killed Frank Poole in the movie. Surprising it didn’t also kill Dave Bowman.
Somebody has to plug it in.
The robots will plug it in.
Somebody has to program it.
AI will program itself.
There is a role for humans in the process.
We will need fewer humans.
 
We will need fewer humans.

Somebody has to drink all the beer and buy all the products the AI devices create.

We create labor saving devices because we don't like to work. Why? So we have more free time to do the things we enjoy.

With all the free time, we humans can create more humans. If you know what I mean.
 
Somebody has to drink all the beer and buy all the products the AI devices create.

We create labor saving devices because we don't like to work. Why? So we have more free time to do the things we enjoy.

With all the free time, we humans can create more humans. If you know what I mean.
Are all the AI devices going to run the "beer and products" companies without human intervention, including and especially human board directors, CEOs, CFOs or other executives? And then give away their products to all the displaced humans who no longer have enough money to purchase them with legal tender? Are the AI systems going to prevent humans from "murdering" them? (As in turning them off or sabotaging them?)

I can tell you haven't spent a boatload of time designing and writing computer software, or debugging logic problems, or chasing down coding bugs or typos. People who have are a lot less sanguine about what our AI future holds than you seem to be.
 


Back
Top Bottom