• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

2026 prediction thread.

Then I have a suggestion, since you seem to have enough time on your hands to do so ... find the thread for 2025 and see how many predictions people got right and how many were outrageously wrong.

I would find that thread quite illuminating.
2025 Prediction thread | RadioDiscussions https://share.google/Xa4wWi45LXtwG0dRd I don't start them every year...some years its other people. No Paramount/Peacock merger (something that's happened in other countries, but still a possibility for the future), price hikes, content moving rightward (that was CBS News), downsizing (that was Max to HBO Max). So did okay last year, but don't know about others' predictions.
 
Price hikes was probably a safe bet. So was downsizing (although, being of an age when HBO was the premier pay service, it's sad to see that they were the confirmation of that prediction) . I think a certain amount of rightward motion on the part of CBS News was going to be expected after that misstep of trying to placate Trump -- I still think they were incredibly naïve about that -- and I refuse to guess at which merger will happen next.

I looked at the rest of that thread, and have these observations:
  • @Mediafrog+: The TEGNA layoffs were actually a precursor to the Nexstar deal, which was not foreseen. Local TV ownership caps have not been lifted (yet) so every prediction based on that presumption can be dismissed out of hand (for the moment, anyway).
  • @crainbebo: One late night talk show was indeed cancelled. No real motion on the part of the cable networks to go 100% streaming ... although that's probably also only a matter of time (apologies to Brook Benton and Randy Travis). No "battle" at the FCC about yanking licenses, and given comments made in other threads on that issue I don't see it being an issue anywhere but in Trump's mind ... basically, Carr has no unilateral power and I don't see the full Commission kowtowing to him over that.
  • @Y2kTheNewOldies: Your prediction about CNBC and MSNOW needing to find new pundits before the mid-terms was about a year too early; it took most of the year for the SpinCo Versant deal to finally complete. Your later post about bundles got watered down by people who tired of the cost of streaming subscriptions and cancelled more of them than they signed up for anew.
  • @Megatron: Wow. I hope your post in that thread was meant to be sarcastic, because it read like Bizarro World. You were right about WPIX, though.
  • @CurtisNEPA: Right about TEGNA being ripe for takeover, wrong on who would go after them. Also wrong about Nightline, and about Netflix starting a sports network.
  • @nickp: Berkshire Hathaway interested in Scripps? Really?
  • @TVCOOL: Wrong on pretty much all counts. @KeithE4 said it best on the merger, and we already know what happened to the spunoff networks from Comcast. @Y2kTheNewOldies debunked your "market merger" prediction (and thanks for linking to my article on KCCC in the process, Y2k). You were also wrong that the networks would give 11:35pm back to the stations ... didn't happen with Colbert ... see @AbrahamJSimpson's rebuttal.
  • @mnradiofan: Good overview on the overall decline of both cable and broadcast television, but your predictions on some of the details fell flat. Specifically, I don't see Disney shutting anything down that they can use as leverage for future carriage negotiations (as we saw with the recent blackout).
  • @Tim from Springfield IL: I think the jury is still out on the technical changes you hinted at, but as cord cutting continues to increase, the direction you predict is certainly possible. Just wasn't quite ready to happen yet. @Don CT had the most likely explanation for the delay.
Most of page 3 of that thread was responding to earlier posts, so I will not comment on those posts. But I will compliment all of you for keeping that thread to only three pages!
 
Last edited:
Yes and I had to cite the median age of then MSNBC/current MSNOW as 71 during the final years the network was under Comcast management. We saw some of the process taking place with some of the news staff at MSNBC being reassigned to NBC News Now or layoffs. How that translate to lowering the median age at Versant owned places we have to wait until the end of 2026 to find out.

Market Merger thats unlikely but we seen rare instances where News Press-Gazette CBS Affiliate KION-TV Monterey had to fire their entire news staff and replace it with a simulcast of KPIX-TV's CBS Bay Area News in its former time slots was one of them but that does not change market rankings for Monterey TV Market. Also rumors of some parts of the country having to import an out of state or out of market PBS affiliate in response to the CPB recission escalated when stories about local public TV stations debated about removing their affiliation with PBS either became true in some TV markets or proven false in other cases.


Licensee of WSRE ends PBS affiliation, moves to decertify foundation



 
my predictions for TV in 2026

the TEGNA/Nexstar merger is approved and finished, and in a shocking move, Disney reaches a agreement with the post-merger Nexstar to trade WFAA & KFAA in Dallas in exchanged for KFSN in Fresno, CA & WTVD in Durham–Raleigh–Fayetteville, NC so they don't have to worry about having to buy out a local station in Dallas and make sure a ABC O&O can exist in a market that has O&O from CBS, NBC & Fox as well as The CW, Ion & MyNetworkTV (i'm not sure if it still exist) and Telemundo & Univision/UniMas on the Spanish TV side.

Speaking of Nexstar, once their TEGNA merger is complete, they try to acquire either Versant from NBCUniversal or Discovery Global (once the spinoff of WBD is complete), the reason, they want to boost up The CW Sports and maybe merge it with either USA Sports or TNT Sports, and same goes with NewsNation, they want to merge it into either MS Now/CNBC or CNN, also it would boost up their efforts at negotiating with paid TV providers.


The College Football Playoffs controversies leads to the birth of the NCFL, a new college football league founded by the SEC, Big XII, Big Ten, ACC and the reforming PAC 12 along with ESPN, TNT Sports & the NFL with NCAA involved as well in a minority ownership role, they adopt a NFL style system of regions with one group being part of the American College Football Conference and the other part being the National College Football Conference with a East/West/Central/South divisions dividing the teams of the 2 conference up in 4 groups, the championship game is not the CFP National Championship but instead the College Football Super Bowl, this leads to NBA, NHL & MLB teaming up with TV Partners and NCAA to do the same for their respected sports, the sports gambling business is the biggest diving factor for it's creation.

WWE & AEW shocks the wrestling world by agreeing to a work agreement to allow AEW talents on WWE TV and WWE Talents on AEW TV and it helps both companies., especially after WWE's greed under TKO ownership leads to a collapse of ticket sales and viewership for WWE TV.

NASCAR reaches a agreement to end all ties with NBCUniversal and all of the NBC portion of the 2025-2031 TV rights and because of it Amazon Prime's part of the season is extended, TNT gets the amount of races that would have been on NBC, and USA airs the entire playoffs with no NBC as a partner for 2026. this leads to NASCAR ending all deals set to expire in 2031 to end in 2026 as part of the end of the ongoing NASCAR/23XI Racing & Front Row Motorsports lawsuit revealing NASCAR is having money issues due to continuous ratings declines and loss of big million dollar sponsorship deals as many sponsors left the sport in the last 15 years.

Netflix/WB merger is canceled by the US government and Paramount Skydance ends up doing a hostile takeover by buying majority of their stocks and installing their leadership to complete the merger.

Bryon Allen tries and fails to acquire Discovery or Versant and the reason he's trying to buy them, he betting on paid lineal TV making a comeback due to the ever growing expensive of streaming services getting more expensive then Cable & Satellite TV at their peak over 15 to 20 years ago, plus also he wants to merge The Weather Channel into CNN or reunite them with MS Now/CNBC.

New Fox also tries to buy Discovery or Versant and also fails.

Jimmy Kimmel announces retirement from Late Night TV citing the Charlie Kirk controversy and the recent death of his best friend and show's house band leader Cleto Escobedo III, Daily Show moves to Paramount+ exclusively and NBC retires The Tonight Show & Late Night, but moves Seth Myers & Jimmy Fallon to Peacock for Jimmy to host a new interview show while Seth launches a weekly comedy show that is Peacock's answer to Last Week Tonight, and speaking of, Last Week Tonight is moved to HBO Max exclusively.

Lorne Michaels retires from SNL as the man in charge, hands the reigns over to Tina Fey or Keenan Thompson as his successor.
 
my predictions for TV in 2026

the TEGNA/Nexstar merger is approved and finished, and in a shocking move, Disney reaches a agreement with the post-merger Nexstar to trade WFAA & KFAA in Dallas in exchanged for KFSN in Fresno, CA & WTVD in Durham–Raleigh–Fayetteville, NC so they don't have to worry about having to buy out a local station in Dallas and make sure a ABC O&O can exist in a market that has O&O from CBS, NBC & Fox as well as The CW, Ion & MyNetworkTV (i'm not sure if it still exist) and Telemundo & Univision/UniMas on the Spanish TV side.

Speaking of Nexstar, once their TEGNA merger is complete, they try to acquire either Versant from NBCUniversal or Discovery Global (once the spinoff of WBD is complete), the reason, they want to boost up The CW Sports and maybe merge it with either USA Sports or TNT Sports, and same goes with NewsNation, they want to merge it into either MS Now/CNBC or CNN, also it would boost up their efforts at negotiating with paid TV providers.


The College Football Playoffs controversies leads to the birth of the NCFL, a new college football league founded by the SEC, Big XII, Big Ten, ACC and the reforming PAC 12 along with ESPN, TNT Sports & the NFL with NCAA involved as well in a minority ownership role, they adopt a NFL style system of regions with one group being part of the American College Football Conference and the other part being the National College Football Conference with a East/West/Central/South divisions dividing the teams of the 2 conference up in 4 groups, the championship game is not the CFP National Championship but instead the College Football Super Bowl, this leads to NBA, NHL & MLB teaming up with TV Partners and NCAA to do the same for their respected sports, the sports gambling business is the biggest diving factor for it's creation.

WWE & AEW shocks the wrestling world by agreeing to a work agreement to allow AEW talents on WWE TV and WWE Talents on AEW TV and it helps both companies., especially after WWE's greed under TKO ownership leads to a collapse of ticket sales and viewership for WWE TV.

NASCAR reaches a agreement to end all ties with NBCUniversal and all of the NBC portion of the 2025-2031 TV rights and because of it Amazon Prime's part of the season is extended, TNT gets the amount of races that would have been on NBC, and USA airs the entire playoffs with no NBC as a partner for 2026. this leads to NASCAR ending all deals set to expire in 2031 to end in 2026 as part of the end of the ongoing NASCAR/23XI Racing & Front Row Motorsports lawsuit revealing NASCAR is having money issues due to continuous ratings declines and loss of big million dollar sponsorship deals as many sponsors left the sport in the last 15 years.

Netflix/WB merger is canceled by the US government and Paramount Skydance ends up doing a hostile takeover by buying majority of their stocks and installing their leadership to complete the merger.

Bryon Allen tries and fails to acquire Discovery or Versant and the reason he's trying to buy them, he betting on paid lineal TV making a comeback due to the ever growing expensive of streaming services getting more expensive then Cable & Satellite TV at their peak over 15 to 20 years ago, plus also he wants to merge The Weather Channel into CNN or reunite them with MS Now/CNBC.

New Fox also tries to buy Discovery or Versant and also fails.

Jimmy Kimmel announces retirement from Late Night TV citing the Charlie Kirk controversy and the recent death of his best friend and show's house band leader Cleto Escobedo III, Daily Show moves to Paramount+ exclusively and NBC retires The Tonight Show & Late Night, but moves Seth Myers & Jimmy Fallon to Peacock for Jimmy to host a new interview show while Seth launches a weekly comedy show that is Peacock's answer to Last Week Tonight, and speaking of, Last Week Tonight is moved to HBO Max exclusively.

Lorne Michaels retires from SNL as the man in charge, hands the reigns over to Tina Fey or Keenan Thompson as his successor.
Those are wild predictions...all seem very unlikely.
 
My predictions for 2026:

Byron Allen will finally quit as host of Comics Unleashed. His search to find someone who’s even less funny to take over as host will last until next Christmas.

Dr. Phil will refuse to go away and continue to spend money to launch a streaming channel. He’ll also show up in Scary Movie 6.

More AM stations without translators will go silent or get sold to new owners.
 
Last edited:
It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. :LOL:

I'll go out on a limb and say that the trend of Ancient Modulation stations calling it quits will continue. Mostly smaller stations and those who's tower landlords (whether or not the land is owned by the stations themselves) can make more money by selling the land.
 
It was a stunning reversal and one that few foresaw. In 2026, the Trump Administration had its case against the New York Times fast-tracked to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Administration also sought and got permission for the New York Times case against the Department of War (Defense) combined into its suit so the Justices could rule on both cases at the same time. In a 7-2 decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas that few in the press saw coming, the Justices overturned Sullivan saying that the press did not have the right to treat high government officials differently when it came to both libel and slander laws. In addition, six of the seven Justices that ruled against The New York Times also said that when discussing the current Administration and its policies, the outlook by the media should always be that the government is doing the right thing and that anybody with contrary views should either be ignored or reported to the Administration.

In a blistering dissent both written and spoken from the bench, Justice Sonya Sotomayer backed by Justice Jackson Braun decried the loss of First Amendment freedoms and that many newspapers, over-the-air networks, and online media resources would be closed almost immediately. Her words of warning would prove true as the Trump administration began to take unprecedented actions against The New York Times, NPR, PBS, The Huffington Post, and others to force them to close shop. Rupert and Lakeland Murdock were told, in no uncertain terms, that while Fox News and The Wall Street Journal would be forgiven for any indiscretions in the past, they mus now permanently tow the Administration line on all issues. Over at WNYC, Brooke Gladstone's show, "On The Media," was deleted from carriage when she tried to interview a reporter from Mother Jones about the current and possible future effects of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on this matter.

You don't think it could happen? There were a lot of things that I didn't think could happen in 2025 with the Trump administration and the U.S. Supreme Court and I don't think the horrifying scenario that I've written above is as farfetched now as it would have seemed at the end of 2024.
The press pool part we have to watch out for the "Putin" and "North Korea" comparisons from the Pentagon and White House. It's not even far-fetched now to see that one. Americans would have to rely more on media outside the country like CBC Canada, DW, BBC, ABC Australia and France 24 just to get an accurate picture of the country via news and documentaries.
 
I'll take a stab and say that at least ONE of these TV conglomerates (Nexstar, Sinclair, Cox,...) will experiment with having their own nightly national news show to replace their network affiliate's (CBS/NBC/ABC) nightly news shows. This way, a company like Nexstar will put their own nightly News Nation show across all of their stations, while keeping their current cable/subscription-based NN channel. They will also continue to consolidate their local news operations into state or regional newscasts across multiple stations.

Overall within a few years, I see the Nexstars of the world becoming their own "networks": Getting the exclusive rights to daytime, and other syndicated programming to air at similar times across all of their stations -- in a sense, homogenizing their stations, while only being affiliated with the Big 4 networks for primetime and sports programming.
 
Well, since @radiofan2023 and @KeithE4 have brought it up, I'm going to repeat a prediction I made already in several other threads, although I do not necessarily think it will happen as quickly as within the next 12 months.

I agree that a significant number of standalone AMs (i.e., sans FM translator) will go permanently silent over the next few years. They will almost certainly be those with 5kW ERP or less, perhaps even some as high as 10kW ERP in markets where AM listening is approaching a level of non-existent.

The prime candidates for same will be the ones that are plugged into satellite-delivered formats. The ones that are considered "heritage", with local ownership and locally-originated programming, will hold on as long as they can, but I expect most of them either already have translators or will jump at a chance to acquire same.

And that brings me to what I have been saying for a couple of years now. The "AM Revitalization Act" which allowed for translators to rebroadcast AM stations was a misnomer ... it did nothing to improve AM itself. I believe the FCC will see that, especially if the owners of such stations start lobbying Carr about it, and the following is (IMNSHO) the likely scenario:
  • Translators will be allowed to transition to a new, contour protected, Class A0, provided they have an AM as their program origination source.
  • The associated AM station will be required to go permanently silent and the license surrendered upon the licensing of the translator as a separate station. The call letters would be reassigned to the translator and would have to remain there for a set period of time before the licensee would be allowed to change them.
  • The owners of the new Class A0 stations would also be subject to a minimum period of ownership after the transition before selling them to another operator. (This would not preclude format changes, as I don't want to reopen that can of worms in terms of FCC authority over same.)
  • The transition period would have a fixed start and end date, after which all stations that did not convert to Class A0 would permanently remain Class D ... no "after the fact" applications for later conversion.
  • This would not apply to translators which retransmit HD streams from FMs, because ... well, that has nothing to do with AM stations.
  • After the transition, the remaining AM stations would be allowed to submit applications for power increases, directional pattern changes, and the like, based on what AMs were still on the air and requiring protection.
This would declutter the AM band, making the remaining stations (most of which I would expect to be licensed at higher power levels) more viable and less susceptible to skywave and groundwave interference.

BTW, if I may be permitted a second long-term prediction, I also think that at some point, the FCC will see the outdatedness of § 73.1201 and do away with the required call letters/community of license announcement each hour. We are one of the very few countries that still require that, and the FCC field inspectors don't need that announcement to do their jobs.
 
Well, since @radiofan2023 and @KeithE4 have brought it up, I'm going to repeat a prediction I made already in several other threads, although I do not necessarily think it will happen as quickly as within the next 12 months.

I agree that a significant number of standalone AMs (i.e., sans FM translator) will go permanently silent over the next few years. They will almost certainly be those with 5kW ERP or less, perhaps even some as high as 10kW ERP in markets where AM listening is approaching a level of non-existent.

The prime candidates for same will be the ones that are plugged into satellite-delivered formats. The ones that are considered "heritage", with local ownership and locally-originated programming, will hold on as long as they can, but I expect most of them either already have translators or will jump at a chance to acquire same.

And that brings me to what I have been saying for a couple of years now. The "AM Revitalization Act" which allowed for translators to rebroadcast AM stations was a misnomer ... it did nothing to improve AM itself. I believe the FCC will see that, especially if the owners of such stations start lobbying Carr about it, and the following is (IMNSHO) the likely scenario:
  • Translators will be allowed to transition to a new, contour protected, Class A0, provided they have an AM as their program origination source.
  • The associated AM station will be required to go permanently silent and the license surrendered upon the licensing of the translator as a separate station. The call letters would be reassigned to the translator and would have to remain there for a set period of time before the licensee would be allowed to change them.
  • The owners of the new Class A0 stations would also be subject to a minimum period of ownership after the transition before selling them to another operator. (This would not preclude format changes, as I don't want to reopen that can of worms in terms of FCC authority over same.)
  • The transition period would have a fixed start and end date, after which all stations that did not convert to Class A0 would permanently remain Class D ... no "after the fact" applications for later conversion.
  • This would not apply to translators which retransmit HD streams from FMs, because ... well, that has nothing to do with AM stations.
  • After the transition, the remaining AM stations would be allowed to submit applications for power increases, directional pattern changes, and the like, based on what AMs were still on the air and requiring protection.
This would declutter the AM band, making the remaining stations (most of which I would expect to be licensed at higher power levels) more viable and less susceptible to skywave and groundwave interference.

BTW, if I may be permitted a second long-term prediction, I also think that at some point, the FCC will see the outdatedness of § 73.1201 and do away with the required call letters/community of license announcement each hour. We are one of the very few countries that still require that, and the FCC field inspectors don't need that announcement to do their jobs.
That is ALOT to happen within the time frame of one year. I could see a good portion of that happening in the next FIVE to TEN years. But, unless it's a Trump-like mandate, these would be FCC actions that will take years to fully happen.
 
That is ALOT to happen within the time frame of one year. I could see a good portion of that happening in the next FIVE to TEN years. But, unless it's a Trump-like mandate, these would be FCC actions that will take years to fully happen.

Kat, please reread my first paragraph.
 
I'll take a stab and say that at least ONE of these TV conglomerates (Nexstar, Sinclair, Cox,...) will experiment with having their own nightly national news show to replace their network affiliate's (CBS/NBC/ABC) nightly news shows. This way, a company like Nexstar will put their own nightly News Nation show across all of their stations, while keeping their current cable/subscription-based NN channel. They will also continue to consolidate their local news operations into state or regional newscasts across multiple stations.

Overall within a few years, I see the Nexstars of the world becoming their own "networks": Getting the exclusive rights to daytime, and other syndicated programming to air at similar times across all of their stations -- in a sense, homogenizing their stations, while only being affiliated with the Big 4 networks for primetime and sports programming.
That sounds like Nexstar given their ownership of the CW network, NewsNation and the Hill and the current status of the Nexstar/Tegna deal there's the issue of how many markets would have to change affiliations to the CW as part of the agreement for them to have only Nexstar owned content on their stations.

And on another hand the National Desk is one Sinclair has for its owned stations. How that replaces the network evening news is unknown.
 
Once again, none of that will be even proposed in the next year or ever. I would go as far to say, longer than ten years. Great ideas, but this sounds more your like your wishlist than actual proposals

But great ideas K.M.! 😊

Thank you, but your original criticism was unfounded. Allow me to quote myself, with emphasis:

I'm going to repeat a prediction I made already in several other threads, although I do not necessarily think it will happen as quickly as within the next 12 months.

I will also add that I have run this past several people in the industry -- including the stations I consult -- and they all think it makes sense and is likely (for the most part) to be reality by decade's end.
 
Thank you, but your original criticism was unfounded. Allow me to quote myself, with emphasis:



I will also add that I have run this past several people in the industry -- including the stations I consult -- and they all think it makes sense and is likely (for the most part) to be reality by decade's end.
Not criticism, just added my thought on it.
 
Where's the "white flag of surrender" emoji when I need it?

Edit: 🏳️
 


Back
Top Bottom