The “What’s Cookin’ Today” host is getting ready to stick a fork in KABC!
Hey! You’re on to something. They can simply simulcast and call it the “Who’s Listening to Us” radio network. As KNX and KCBS have recently demonstrated, you can cover traffic and weather in both areas and even do it while accurately using the correct local nomenclatures, like “the 101” for LA and “101” or “highway 101” for the Bay Area.And here's the lineup for 790 KABC:
Tuesday
12:00 AM – 3:00 AM: Red Eye Radio
3:00 AM – 4:00 AM: America in the Morning
4:00 AM – 6:00 AM: ABC7 Eyewitness News
6:00 AM – 9:00 AM: Armstrong & Getty
9:00 AM – 12:00 PM: The Vince Show
12:00 PM – 3:00 PM: John Phillips
3:00 PM – 4:00 PM: Howard Jarvis Radio Show
4:00 PM – 5:00 PM: Mottek On Money
5:00 PM – 6:00 PM: The Guy Benson Show
6:00 PM – 7:00 PM: Howard Jarvis Radio Show
7:00 PM – 8:00 PM: Fix California Hour
8:00 PM – 9:00 PM: What’s Cookin’ Today
9:00 PM – 10:00 PM: Armstrong & Getty: The 4th Hour
10:00 PM – 3:00 AM: Red Eye Radio
At this point both KABC and KSFO could cut cost even more and run both out of the same studio at Westwood One. And just focus on KNBR and KSAN in San Francisco.
Is the John Phillips/Randy Wang show broadcast locally from Los Angeles? I realize it’s simulcast on KSFO.Hey! You’re on to something. They can simply simulcast and call it the “Who’s Listening to Us” radio network. As KNX and KCBS have recently demonstrated, you can cover traffic and weather in both areas and even do it while accurately using the correct local nomenclatures, like “the 101” for LA and “101” or “highway 101” for the Bay Area.
What I think some folks forget to keep in mind is that a company such as Cumulus with multiple lines of business is going to consider how those lines of business complement one another. They will try to leverage that. Sometimes that means it will make decisions that don't make sense for an individual station but which are more reasonable when you step up a level and look at it from a portfolio point of view. Another corporate term for this is "cross-cutting". The WW1 shows may not do particularly well in San Francisco or Los Angeles, but they are there, and that can be a sales tool to get into other markets where Cumulus can get more for the availabilities that they're trying to sell within those shows.What has been opined here for years is true. Cumulus only keeps it on the air for WWOne clearances. Same thing goes for what was 560 and is now 810 in S.F.
Of course, you're joking, but seriously, do they even do traffic and weather on KSFO and KGO (oops KSFO)? Finding out for myself would mean having to listen through Talk radio like this...something I just would rather not do.Hey! You’re on to something. They can simply simulcast and call it the “Who’s Listening to Us” radio network. As KNX and KCBS have recently demonstrated, you can cover traffic and weather in both areas and even do it while accurately using the correct local nomenclatures, like “the 101” for LA and “101” or “highway 101” for the Bay Area.
Of course, you're joking, but seriously, do they even do traffic and weather on KSFO and KGO (oops KSFO)? Finding out for myself would mean having to listen through Talk radio like this...something I just would rather not do.
BTW you were joking, right?
The WW1 shows may not do particularly well in San Francisco or Los Angeles, but they are there, and that can be a sales tool to get into other markets where Cumulus can get more for the availabilities that they're trying to sell within those shows.
With numbers like that, and the trend Cumulus 810 appears to be on, you're absolutely CERTAIN my above post about trying entertainment as a format on 560 wouldn't be worth a try? The classic radio shows would be new to most people. Remember, the right ones would have to be selected; those that are not automatically dated with big band music or references to WW2. I am thinking that since they are on Internet Archive, they are available free or for very little. The people who might be invited to advertise might be the clients who are seeing their current audience evaporate with the existing lineups. Cumulus has the frequency at 560 for a few months more, and I read here apparently the tower lease and transmitter are still there.The Holiday book came out yesterday. We now have a seven-book trend for KSFO (810) since July 2025:
1.5-1.3-1.2-1.1-0.8-0.7-0.6
In San Jose, the switch to 810 resulted in some very good numbers early on. I don't have April, May, June or July, but here's the six book trend since August 2025:
2.7-1.9-1.7-1.5.-1.6-1.3
Yikes.
Yes. A very common tactic is to put a station back on the air for a few days, notify the FCC, and turn it off again.Another thought, if they tried a 560 experiment and resumed broadcasting at that frequency, does that reset any FCC delisting clock?
Maybe try believing people who have been in the broadcasting business for years and have explained clearly why playing 65+ year old radio shows is NEVER going to work.Maybe try thinking of how something new might work, instead of focusing on why it wouldn't.
Cumulus typically has not done that.Yes. A very common tactic is to put a station back on the air for a few days, notify the FCC, and turn it off again.
Good Lord, not this again. I can't believe I'm even responding to this.With numbers like that, and the trend Cumulus 810 appears to be on, you're absolutely CERTAIN my above post about trying entertainment as a format on 560 wouldn't be worth a try? The classic radio shows would be new to most people. Remember, the right ones would have to be selected; those that are not automatically dated with big band music or references to WW2. I am thinking that since they are on Internet Archive, they are available free or for very little. The people who might be invited to advertise might be the clients who are seeing their current audience evaporate with the existing lineups. Cumulus has the frequency at 560 for a few months more, and I read here apparently the tower lease and transmitter are still there.
The problem is, it's not new. It's radio as it was done until TV came along.Maybe try thinking of how something new might work
With numbers like that, and the trend Cumulus 810 appears to be on, you're absolutely CERTAIN my above post about trying entertainment as a format on 560 wouldn't be worth a try?
The classic radio shows would be new to most people.
Remember, the right ones would have to be selected; those that are not automatically dated with big band music or references to WW2.
I am thinking that since they are on Internet Archive, they are available free or for very little.
The people who might be invited to advertise might be the clients who are seeing their current audience evaporate with the existing lineups.
Cumulus has the frequency at 560 for a few months more, and I read here apparently the tower lease and transmitter are still there.
Another problem may be Cumulus is not broadcasting to a viable left leaning audience.
The idea of running a few hours of talk was shot down because experienced radio people cost money and screeners cost money and etcetera. Don't they have these people and studios at KNBR? For an experiment, I would think real radio people with Hertz in their blood would want to take part in something new (getting paid for their efforts).
Even if it failed, they could say they gave it their all.
Another thought, if they tried a 560 experiment and resumed broadcasting at that frequency, does that reset any FCC delisting clock?
Maybe try thinking of how something new might work, instead of focusing on why it wouldn't.
Most Bay Area techie-types (many of whom tend to be left-leaning, I believe), wouldn't be caught dead listening to radio at all, especially on AM.There is no viable left-leaning audience listening to AM radio in San Francisco in 2026.
That's actually an interesting idea!I've said this before, but it's been a while. What we really need is an online radio station simulator...y'know like Flight Simulator. Something where you can play radio, try these ideas and see what actually happens in the real world without putting revenue and the salaries and benefits that revenue pays for at risk.
How do you know it will NEVER work? Didn't someone cite Antioch Radio as being able to make a go of old radio on a small scale?Maybe try believing people who have been in the broadcasting business for years and have explained clearly why playing 65+ year old radio shows is NEVER going to work.
Well, if it were a relatively common 70s/80s variety, it night work, except an AM without either an FM translator or full power FM simulcast is pretty much dead in the water regardless of format.Turn 810 into a classic hits station.