• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

CBS News Radio Closed

Status
Not open for further replies.
She hasn't led a large organization before. I think that's why Cibrowski is still there, to keep things running, because he has had that kind of experience.
He used to be President & GM of KGO-TV just before the current role. (Lieberman used to take dumps on him for sport.)
 
The bias can be there but difficult to see. Let's pretend the top 10 news stories in the current hour are: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J. CBS's newscast airs A, B, C, D, E, F, maybe G if enough seconds remain in the cast.

Fox looks at the same stories and airs A, C, E, F, H, J. If you listen to a Fox newscast, you'd never know B, D, G or I had happened. Why? Because those latter stories don't fit the narrative Fox wants to sell you. Bias by omission.

NPR does what CBS does, only they give more seconds to each of the biggest or newest news stories. So in their case it might be A, B, C, D, and if time permits E. Not enough time in the current hour to squeeze in the other stories. But E, F, G, etc. might have gotten the full treatment in earlier newscasts, and in any event all of those stories were (or will be) covered on Morning Edition and/or All Things Considered and/or Here and Now.
The bias is most definitely there, and much in the way you describe. I just listened to the last hour's FOX News Radio TOH news cast, which included a shooting of a white woman by a "migrant" in Chicago That's totally red meat to the Fox News demo, and nobody else. Sure, it's a tragedy, as are the dozens of other shootings in America every weekend. But this one happened in the liberal hellhole of Chicago and involved a "migrant." Of course by using the term migrant they are assuming you make the leap to illegal, even though that part is not actually known yet. But he is origianlly from another country and has a Hispanic sounding name, so that's good enough. AND the network reported on Robert Mueller's death but absolutely didn't include Turmp's reaction.

SO, yeah, same ol' Fox News, even on the headlines. Context- there are approxiamtely 100 gun deaths per weekend in the US, outside of suicides. But this one counts, for some reason.
 
Last edited:


“The author is president/CEO of JVC Broadcasting in Ronkonkoma, N.Y. He released this statement on Sunday.”
A bit hypocritical since he uses VT and other labor saving technoligies for his stations, but he is well positioned to actually enact something like this and offer it. I think his outlook is a bit Pollyannaish but I wish him the best.
 
The bias is most definitely there, and much in the way you describe. I just listened to the last hour's FOX News Radio TOH news cast, which included a shooting of a white woman by a "migrant" in Chicago That's totally red meat to the Fox News demo, and nobody else. Sure, it's a tragedy, as are the dozens of other shootings in America every weekend. But this one happened in the liberal hellhole of Chicago and involved a "migrant." Of course by using the term migrant they are assuming you make the leap to illegal, even though that part is not actually known yet. But he is origianlly from another country and has a Hispanic sounding name, so that's good enough. AND the network reported on Robert Mueller's death but absolutely didn't include Turmp's reaction.

SO, yeah, same ol' Fox News, even on the headlines. Context- there are approxiamtely 100 gun deaths per weekend in the US, outside of suicides. But this one counts, for some reason.
That's been the way Fox News operated from the start. And millions see it as clearly as we do. (It's pretty hard to miss the deliberate and chronically repeated right wing buzzwords. Like the repetitive committee hearing behavior of Trump officials of word salad, hostility, evading simple Yes/No questions and other showboating stunts for the cameras, they were taught to do this by someone. No one does anything like that organically.)

As for CBS News for radio, that looked doomed for some time (at least since Mutual went under). All the old mainline radio networks are gone except the brand names.

ABC will eventually go and maybe even CNN and Fox. Leaving AP and maybe the frumpy SRN/Townhall newscasts for commercial radio national newscasts. (I would barf if I heard that on KNWN.)

I don't think Audacy and Hubbard particularly wants to start dedicated in-house radio news services.They could, they certainly have the resources. But it's a big new internal expense with questionable return. And they'll look elsewhere to outsource from cheaper sources before they get to that point. iHeart already has a very good news network, BIN. All they have to make is separate hourly "iHeart News" casts.

When it comes to radio news, it's damn hard to beat NPR. Perhaps because they can go deeper into the stories that the time constraints of commercial radio will not allow. That could be another reason for CBS bailing out of radio news. But most heritage media has already been washing itself of radio and all audio products beyond podcasts.
 
iHeart already has a very good news network, BIN. All they have to make is separate hourly "iHeart News" casts.

FYI: They already have iHeart 24/7, which is part of their Total Traffic network.


When it comes to radio news, it's damn hard to beat NPR.

The business model is based on listener support rather than advertising. That may be the best way to fund news coverage.
 
The business model is based on listener support rather than advertising. That may be the best way to fund news coverage.
And you're probably right. Radio will soon be no longer be viable for national advertising. Once that goes, the fire sales on station clusters begins.
 
Here's a thought piece on the closing of CBS News Radio. I think it covers a lot of the subjects we've already discussed, but it's put together in a single piece.


I said earlier that it's both. The finances had eroded to the point where the business model didn't work. Plus it really doesn't fit with where CBS News is aiming to go. The writing was on the wall before PSKY took over.
 
The bias is most definitely there, and much in the way you describe. I just listened to the last hour's FOX News Radio TOH news cast, which included a shooting of a white woman by a "migrant" in Chicago That's totally red meat to the Fox News demo, and nobody else. Sure, it's a tragedy, as are the dozens of other shootings in America every weekend. But this one happened in the liberal hellhole of Chicago and involved a "migrant." Of course by using the term migrant they are assuming you make the leap to illegal, even though that part is not actually known yet. But he is origianlly from another country and has a Hispanic sounding name, so that's good enough. AND the network reported on Robert Mueller's death but absolutely didn't include Turmp's reaction.

SO, yeah, same ol' Fox News, even on the headlines. Context- there are approxiamtely 100 gun deaths per weekend in the US, outside of suicides. But this one counts, for some reason.
There is bias on both sides. I've had to stop listening to a local station that airs that rebranded NBC news in the mornings because it's so over-the-top. Here is an example of a newscast opening I heard on there.

"New documents leaked from the ongoing trial reveal that Donald Trump once said "Booger!" to Stormy Daniels.
In other news, Japan was destroyed by an earthquake overnight."

Okay, I'm exaggerating. But not by much. You're free to love Trump or hate him, but the fact that every newscast starts
with a Trump "gotcha" before moving on to cover actual substantive news was just more than I could stomach.
 
The bias is most definitely there, and much in the way you describe. I just listened to the last hour's FOX News Radio TOH news cast, which included a shooting of a white woman by a "migrant" in Chicago That's totally red meat to the Fox News demo, and nobody else. Sure, it's a tragedy, as are the dozens of other shootings in America every weekend. But this one happened in the liberal hellhole of Chicago and involved a "migrant." Of course by using the term migrant they are assuming you make the leap to illegal, even though that part is not actually known yet. But he is origianlly from another country and has a Hispanic sounding name, so that's good enough. AND the network reported on Robert Mueller's death but absolutely didn't include Turmp's reaction.

SO, yeah, same ol' Fox News, even on the headlines. Context- there are approxiamtely 100 gun deaths per weekend in the US, outside of suicides. But this one counts, for some reason.
Therefore every migrant, without exception is universally guilty. That's the implication and used all the time by the administration and Fox.
 
You're free to love Trump or hate him, but the fact that every newscast starts
with a Trump "gotcha" before moving on to cover actual substantive news was just more than I could stomach.

Keep in mind that what the president does is news, regardless of who he is. This particular president was a media star before he became a politician. So he knows how the media works, and knows how to control the conversation. He does that regularly with his social media posts, that are quotable and attributable, thus are news. In the 24 hour news cycle, those kinds of things move to the top of all newscasts because the president said it. An example of that might be his comment on the death of Robert Mueller.
 
Keep in mind that what the president does is news, regardless of who he is. This particular president was a media star before he became a politician. So he knows how the media works, and knows how to control the conversation. He does that regularly with his social media posts, that are quotable and attributable, thus are news. In the 24 hour news cycle, those kinds of things move to the top of all newscasts because the president said it. An example of that might be his comment on the death of Robert Mueller.
Moreover, he's accessible. He complains about the media, but he's always got material for them. So he gets to shape the conversation, both directly and indirectly.

This is a lesson that Democrats, in particular, have been inept at understanding. Joe Biden got much more hostile coverage as a result.
 
Another New York Times piece (gosh, is this getting them to pay actual attention to radio?) on the closure of CBS News Radio. It's more of a retrospective than a story with new developments, but here's a gift link:

It's a great piece. So much focus on pre-TV and pre-internet radio may be why radio has become so vulnerable.

One quote:

Lowell Bergman, a prominent former “60 Minutes” producer now working on a documentary about the regulation of mass media, said in an interview that CBS News Radio represented a century-old pact that broadcasters made with the government to provide responsible journalism free of charge when radio was still an emerging technology.

A book I read on Edward R. Murrow talked about news then as "sustaining" programming, which is to say, it wasn't based on profit. That was why Murrow also did commercial programming for CBS TV, such as his Person To Person celebrity interviews. He was the original Barbara Walters. But CBS did news at a loss because it made so much money from its entertainment. Once that equation changed, news could no longer exist on its own. CBS Evening News gets support from the profits from 60 Minutes. CBS News Radio had no such support.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom