• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The ABC vs the FCC war of words has escalated…

Cross-promotion on the network make sense. NBC dominates Sunday nights in the fall with football, and has expanded to make it a year round sports night. CBS has done decently with procedural dramas. Fox has its animation/comedy block. ABC filling the evening with library content that can cross promote the brand is logical and useful.
 
Glad to see Disney fighting this will go to the courts and The FCC will lose. I don't think making comments to The FCC ways those that are on The FCC and I doubt that their reading the comments in my opinion. It's for those that are really passionate about topic that The FCC has to be on the public record. I'm not writing a comment to The FCC since they don't care what I have to say plus I don't want to be on the record LOL.
 

This is going on the levels we seen when other countries had their network license yanked. But in this case it’s directed at the local TV licenses Disney manages.

Conservative groups are preparing to urge the Federal Communications Commission to revoke Disney's broadcast television licenses, two representatives told POLITICO — a step that would build on agency Chair Brendan Carr's already unprecedented efforts to punish President Donald Trump's perceived critics in the media.

The petitioners are expected to include a lawyer leading the conservative Center for American Rights who filed complaints against NBC's "Saturday Night Live" and CBS' "60 Minutes" about alleged favoritism toward Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential campaign. Carr immediately revived those complaints once he assumed the gavel, kick-starting a year and a half of threats and investigations that have left the media industry on edge.

The new petitions will heighten the stakes, injecting politically charged issues such as alleged partisan bias into the FCC's decision on whether Disney should keep its lucrative licenses.


It has a resemblance to how ABS-CBN Philippines had their radio and TV network license yanked because of the then Duterte Administration didn’t like the news coverage directed at them.
 
Glad to see Disney fighting this will go to the courts and The FCC will lose. I don't think making comments to The FCC ways those that are on The FCC and I doubt that their reading the comments in my opinion. It's for those that are really passionate about topic that The FCC has to be on the public record. I'm not writing a comment to The FCC since they don't care what I have to say plus I don't want to be on the record LOL.

Whether or not the FCC loses will very much depend on whoever the judge is hearing the case. And, if the Trump Administration loses, it will most likely appeal the decision all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if it has to. The president's ability to muffle public criticism of him and his policies would be on the line here.
 
There isn’t a case yet. There may well be in the not so distant future, but for now it’s Disney pushing back against an action, not filing a suit. If it does go to a trial, it almost certainly would eventually wind up before SCOTUS; neither side is going to concede until all avenue are exhausted or they reach a settlement.

A bit of irony that ABC is the network going all in on the over-the-top, sugar-coated patriotism this week with that 24-hour (and then some) nonstop propaganda fest. It’s exactly the kind of thing the current regime seems to bask in, but because one late-night comedian poked fun at the gasbag in chief, here we are.
 
i wonder if this drama will lead to Disney/ABC to be the first broadcast TV Network to ditch the free over the air model in favor of a paywall streaming/cable TV broadcasting model just so they don't have to worry about the FCC anymore and put everything behind a paywall and shut their O&O down and force their non-O&O to be force to choose NBC, CBS, Fox, CW, Ion, a random Diginet, go full independent or shutdown.

i know this will be a financial burden but if it's a choice between being free and not bending the knee and airing on a platform that can't have a FCC being run by a fascist dictator go after them or bend the knee and become another propaganda outlet for the dictator's regime, I'm sure Disney will be picking the freedom of streaming option and make money off of standing up against the dictator when the nation is still not quite fully completed the transition from free democracy to autocratic dictatorship with no freedoms.
True and heres the other part The Trump administration core issues goes all the way back when he was the CEO of Trump inc. He put out this image to the public that the CEO of a company is a dictator for ages and it lead to multiple lawsuits against him directly. We proven it right here we compare him to other CEO's especially companies like Disney. We proven here that companies like Disney need board of directors for approval, Disney needs to deal with consultants from their legal team to investment groups all to respond to stuff like Trumps/Carr's FCC threats. Here is more.




Gorsuch mentioned the FCC as one of the agencies that could be impacted by the decision.

“Last year, taking objection to a network host’s on-air remarks, the Chairman of the FCC suggested there would be ‘additional work … ahead’ for the agency if broadcasting companies did not ‘find ways to … take action,'” he wrote.

The justice was referencing comments made by Carr, who has been openly critical of Kimmel and other late-night hosts who routinely mock the president and his allies. Carr has repeatedly insisted the FCC has a duty to scrutinize whether major broadcasters who use public airwaves are putting forth content that serves the “public interest.”

He has applied intense scrutiny to ABC specifically, making headlines when he called for a number of local stations owned and operated by Disney, ABC’s parent company, to undergo early license renewal.
 
The Media Research Center has filed a 27-page petition to deny the ABC station license renewals, on much the same grounds as Trump claims, but also without citeable examples:

 
The Media Research Center has filed a 27-page petition to deny the ABC station license renewals, on much the same grounds as Trump claims, but also without citeable examples:

The big problem I see with the petition is it's totally based on the network, and not the individual stations. ABC as a network doesn't have a license, and the FCC has no jurisdiction over the network. Only the stations. If the petition seeks to deny licenses, it needs to specify what the local licensee did, not the network. I see absolutely nothing in the petition directed at the licensees, other than they occasionally carry a network.

It's also very selective in cherry picking the things it doesn't like without mentioning that those same stations carry a lot of other very positive things. This is why these petitions from the MRC usually go nowhere. But since Bozell has friends in the white house and at the FCC, he will get some attention.
 
Someday I would like to see the FCC only deal with licensing of spectrum and adherence to licensed operating parameters, and have no say in what those licensees choose to broadcast. The concept of "serving the public interest" has become meaningless as the average member of the public defines that based on their own personal and political leanings.
 
ABC is a Partisan Operation Engaged in Active Electioneering, Including Interference in a Presidential Debate

ABC Refuses to Report on Many of the Most Critical Issues of Our Day

ABC Uses Public Spectrum to Excuse, and Even Justify, Political Violence

ABC Spreads Misinformation

Whether or not this is opinion or fact will be up to Acting Media Bureau Chief Alex Sanjenis and his team, as it looks at all of the data and analysis surrounding the unprecedented early license renewal of WABC-TV in New York, KABC-TV in Los Angeles, WLS-TV in Chicago, KGO-TV in San Francisco, KTRK-TV in Houston, WPVI-TV in Philadelphia, WTVD-TV in Raleigh-Durham, and KFSN-TV in Fresno.

Ok then but we mentioned it was about something else initially about two of their shows like the View and Jimmy Kimmel. But its too wide of a net without specifics. The complaints now include ABC's World News Tonight in this mix. Yes its about controlling the press pool and the 1st amendment because Carr says so type stuff here.
 
FOLKENFLIK: This is Lisa Stark. She was a Washington correspondent for ABC News for more than 20 years.

STARK: I had seen no indication that the network was in a fighting mood.

FOLKENFLIK: Last fall, Stark helped to arrange a petition signed by 200 former ABC journalists, urging then-Disney CEO Bob Iger to stand up to Carr. They heard nothing back.

STARK: So I was thrilled when I saw that Disney and ABC decided enough is enough and drew a line in the sand and said, we have to fight back. The FCC is being weaponized, and we need to do something about it.


Here's one Lisa Stark one of the former ABC News staff members organized a petition to stop Chairman Carr over interfering with the 1st amendment. That petition is still relevant as Chairman Carr keeps saying all sorts of stuff to justify going after Disney. But then again its a symptom of the Trump administration going back to the time Trump was CEO of Trump inc. Yes its the CEO is the dictator image that the president like to flash out to his supporters.
 
The thing I'm struck by in reading all this is why Disney doesn't do what Comcast did yesterday. Spin off ABC. Maybe include some of the branded cable channels.

I realize it would be a very un-Disney thing to do. They believe in synergy. However, they now have a new CEO who maybe isn't as attached to the old ways as Bob Iger. So he may be open to spinning off a non-core asset.
 


Back
Top Bottom