I appreciate the response of Mark, Warrior and Paperbill. I expected to be slammed for being so direct. I think Bruce mirrors a lot of where radio management is today in that radio expects too much too soon. Unfortunately people are not as emotionally attached to radio these days and one can't just put a format on and know in 6 months if it has legs. It takes time to build a relationship with listeners and I understand why many listeners are cynical. Think of all the formats and call letter changes that occur in every market annually. At one time i believe Bruce was a promotion man for Columbia Records so without analyzing him I can only point out hits were confirmed in weeks and maybe at times we all now run a little too fast for where the audience is. We become a favorite station slowly but we're trying to expect them to respond to every line up adjustment or format change or know our new name as quickly as us.
I do respect some observations and yes from WFLA in tampa to WDBO in Orlando they've remained strong and solid. They've also been established for years with a dependable and consistant product and their success is as much a testimony that loyal audiences remain loyal til we confuse them and run them off.
I'm not an owner. But in today's world of an individual who not only has seen the value of the property go down but the pricing competition and marketing strength of group power (Cox, CC, etc) today's radio world is like your dad's little hardware store trying to compete against Home Depot.
At times you want to say "hang on it's going to be ok" but from property value declining to below budget sales many of us might try and make a quick fix that also under delivers. I don't know what he paid and wonder even now why he holds all AM stations and no FMs. But I would like to believe he like many are (1 just trying to survive (2 is probably the first to know mistakes were made (3 probably wishes he'd sold everything 5 years ago for a profit and (4 had no intention of having a performance record that causes so many people to openly criticize and magnify mistakes or shortcomings. Nobody wants to fail, and honestly we need radio to look healthy as too many ad agencies are already trying to write us off. A station that fails just lets the nay sayers yell "see, I told you so, radio sucks."
I do respect some observations and yes from WFLA in tampa to WDBO in Orlando they've remained strong and solid. They've also been established for years with a dependable and consistant product and their success is as much a testimony that loyal audiences remain loyal til we confuse them and run them off.
I'm not an owner. But in today's world of an individual who not only has seen the value of the property go down but the pricing competition and marketing strength of group power (Cox, CC, etc) today's radio world is like your dad's little hardware store trying to compete against Home Depot.
At times you want to say "hang on it's going to be ok" but from property value declining to below budget sales many of us might try and make a quick fix that also under delivers. I don't know what he paid and wonder even now why he holds all AM stations and no FMs. But I would like to believe he like many are (1 just trying to survive (2 is probably the first to know mistakes were made (3 probably wishes he'd sold everything 5 years ago for a profit and (4 had no intention of having a performance record that causes so many people to openly criticize and magnify mistakes or shortcomings. Nobody wants to fail, and honestly we need radio to look healthy as too many ad agencies are already trying to write us off. A station that fails just lets the nay sayers yell "see, I told you so, radio sucks."