> > WKOX/WRCA/WUNR had to agree that no more stations would use the site and
> > that there would be no power increases, so even if your
> > proposal were technically feasible, which I question, it
> is
> > politically out of the question. It would also cost a
> bloody
> > fortune--not something that WNTN would be likely to
> > contemplate for more than a nanosecond.
Probably right. I suppose the same holds true for taking WNTN to a nite site at the 1510 site in Waltham?
>
> In addition to all that, WNTN would have more than just
> co-channel CBE to deal with at night. They would have first
> adjacents on both sides of their signal with very powerful
> skywaves in the area at night. 1540 from Albany, and 1560
> from NYC.
Yes, that's always been a challenge with 1510 (WTOP 1500 and WWKB on 1520), but
890 in Dedham seems to not be troubled too much by WCBS-880.
I guess I thought that you could blow 99% of the 1550 nite signal right into the city of Boston from Newton or Waltham and have enough protection for CBE and other protected stations.
> > that there would be no power increases, so even if your
> > proposal were technically feasible, which I question, it
> is
> > politically out of the question. It would also cost a
> bloody
> > fortune--not something that WNTN would be likely to
> > contemplate for more than a nanosecond.
Probably right. I suppose the same holds true for taking WNTN to a nite site at the 1510 site in Waltham?
>
> In addition to all that, WNTN would have more than just
> co-channel CBE to deal with at night. They would have first
> adjacents on both sides of their signal with very powerful
> skywaves in the area at night. 1540 from Albany, and 1560
> from NYC.
Yes, that's always been a challenge with 1510 (WTOP 1500 and WWKB on 1520), but
890 in Dedham seems to not be troubled too much by WCBS-880.
I guess I thought that you could blow 99% of the 1550 nite signal right into the city of Boston from Newton or Waltham and have enough protection for CBE and other protected stations.