So, when you say, "As for me being an 'informer,' if that's what people want to call me, its fine. Others have referred to me as the self-appointed Houston radio police. When I see someone in the radio industry doing wrong, I am quick to let Mr. Lee know and. if its above his pay grade, take it to the good folks in Washington," that's all just a bunch of bloviating by a prospective broadcaster who feels he's been somehow taken advantage of.
If you want to be the "self-appointed Houston radio police," fine and dandy. As I stated before, I'm sure Mr. Lee, his staff, and his counterparts in Washington are absolutely thrilled to have your constant and repeated assistance in maintaining broadcast integrity in the Houston market. However, I provided you with plenty of ammunition for this very purpose, and your response was, "Had the Hispanics messed me over, I'd pursue them as relentlessly as I have others. But they didn't, so I don't care what they do. I don't want no trouble." So, I guess you have no intention of "relentlessly pursuing" those who have done wrong, and are misusing the system for their own financial gain. In fact, the only ones you appear to be pursuing are legal broadcasters who are operating within the rules. In fact, that's what this thread was all about in the beginning. But as I said before, it has the appearance of sour grapes.
By the way, I'm still waiting for you to prove the two statements you made about me, and I did ask you nicely. I'm especially interested in knowing which translators I'm shuffling around.