A Jeff and Jer Network?

[Jacmac]

Uhhh, No!

> And, it could have been worse. Mis-infomation could lead the
> Radio-info people to get sued.

That is just a ridiculous statement. When's the last time you heard of a board op being sued over a half-baked rumor or "Mis-infomation" that was posted by somebody? It isn't going to happen.

 

[Garrett]

Don't kill the messenger

Hey, I'm only saying what the fear is, from the perspective of the folks who own the board. Whether or not it's a realistic concern is a whole other issue, but not for me question

 

[KMRichards]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

> Hey, I'm only saying what the fear is, from the perspective
> of the folks who own the board. Whether or not it's a
> realistic concern is a whole other issue, but not for me
> question

Realistic is in the eyes of the beholder.

When running a site such as Radio-Info, the maxim "better safe than sorry" applies. In terms of legalities, the honest truth is that the opinions of the posters on the subject of the rules do not matter.

Now, next time someone wants to challenge that, I'll invoke R-I Rule #5 and delete the thread. If there are repeat offenders, the owners will deal with it.

END OF DISCUSSION.<P ID="signature">______________


</P>

 

[Rocco]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

I agree, better safe than sorry. Let's take it a step further, though, and not allow ANY posts on the board. How much safer can you get than that?

 

[ibezdechi]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

I think it is already happening, unfortunately.

> I agree, better safe than sorry. Let's take it a step
> further, though, and not allow ANY posts on the board. How
> much safer can you get than that?

 

[KMRichards]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

> I think it is already happening, unfortunately.
>
> > I agree, better safe than sorry. Let's take it a step
> > further, though, and not allow ANY posts on the board.
> How
> > much safer can you get than that?

I would rather have the board go quiet during periods when there is nothing really happening in the market than have a lot of posts from people who could care less about the rules and about the legal concerns of the owners.

You people sure complain a lot over something that is free of charge to you.<P ID="signature">______________


</P>

 

[Rocco]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

I guess you get what you pay for.

 

[SDRadio]

Re: Nothing wrong with radio rumors

> Oh, by the way, did you hear the rumor that KLSD might go
> back to being "KGB-AM" and bring back the Boss Jocks?
>

Wow, and I hear that a former VP for a radio company is giving up home made BBQ sauce for fish tacos.<P ID="signature">______________
+--
Chris
SDRadio.net</P>

 

[Jacmac]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

> I guess you get what you pay for.
>

You said a mouthful, the meat of this board is gone. Now they'er cutting the fat, there's not much left but a few bones.

 

[KMRichards]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

> > I guess you get what you pay for.
> >
>
> You said a mouthful, the meat of this board is gone. Now
> they'er cutting the fat, there's not much left but a few
> bones.

So you two will be leaving now? Don't let the door hit you, etc. ...<P ID="signature">______________


</P>

 

[Crusty_Bob]

Re: Nothing wrong with radio rumors

> > Oh, by the way, did you hear the rumor that KLSD might go
> > back to being "KGB-AM" and bring back the Boss Jocks?
> >
>
> Wow, and I hear that a former VP for a radio company is
> giving up home made BBQ sauce for fish tacos.
>

Kansas City BBQ is very over-rated: the best ribs and brisket I ever had was in Oceanside.

 

[Rocco]

Re: Don't kill the messenger

> So you two will be leaving now? Don't let the door hit you,
> etc. ...
>

Hell, no. I'm sticking around to at least watch the Anal Retention Show!
(It's a comedy)