• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live

Status
Not open for further replies.
And here’s the whole doggone poll:

But even one person who feels that the assassination of another person is OK is wrong. The poll shows that a significant percentage of mostly young people do think it is totally or possibly acceptable.
 
Someone thought it was ok to attack Paul Pelosi and would have done the same to the Congresswoman had she been there. Multiple people on the right thought that was a real laugh riot.
I think that the Pelosi incident should not be part of this argument, as there is all kinds of evidence that there was no break and enter and that the attacker was allowed into the residence. This brings "personal reasons" into play, and makes the subject irrelevant in an analysis of politically based attacks.
 
Are we sure it was a MAGA household or, simply a Republican household. Not that it makes a great difference, but it is obvious that the perpetrator went off on his own, dropped out of college and became polarized in a very different direction.
Is it?

He says in the text chain I posted that “ Dad’s been pretty diehard MAGA” since Trump returned to office.

He dropped out of one college, enrolled in a vocational college closer to home (same town) and as far as “polarized in a very different direction”, the only fact we have is that he fell in love with another guy who’s transitioning to female.
 
Kimmel incorrectly attributed the killer's motives and philosophy. In this case, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, he misstated the event to justify his monologue. That is obviously what network management considered.
He didn’t misstate an event. He spoke about the alleged suspext’s background. And he is not a journalist. It’s a subjective opinion about that person’s potential, alleged leanings. And what they “considered” was an open threat of government harassment from the party that once pretended to support both free speech and limited government. Apparently that does not apply to those said party doesn’t like.
 
NY Post says Kimmel is (bleeping) livid and he "wants to end his relationship with ABC". Welp, sounds like Nightline follows your late local news now:

The post also said Howard was fired.
 
Back to scheduling... I'm sure every program director at every ABC affiliate coast-to-coast is scrambling right now to figure out what to broadcast at the 11:35 timeslot. Has there been any official word at ABC as to whether Nightline moves back to it's "OG" 11:35 slot or not? Or if ABC is going to broadcast reruns of JKL, guest host shows of JKL (Martin Short, etc.), or even repeats of 20/20, etc.?

Also: I can't see how Carr can pull the license of a major television network. There's too much risk, given that they have several popular shows in primetime. Worst case scenario: what would happen if the administration yanked ABC's license? Do 200 TV stations instantly become independents or what?

Carr can't pull the license of a TV network *precisely because* TV networks are not licensed by the FCC; only individual stations are.
 
I think that the Pelosi incident should not be part of this argument, as there is all kinds of evidence that there was no break and enter and that the attacker was allowed into the residence. This brings "personal reasons" into play, and makes the subject irrelevant in an analysis of politically based attacks.
Sure there was. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

And Melissa Hortman and Josh Shapiro. Oh right, we call them “other events.” No biggie.
 
But even one person who feels that the assassination of another person is OK is wrong. The poll shows that a significant percentage of mostly young people do think it is totally or possibly acceptable.
Like I said, these Tim Tok videos from young people seem to be OK with advocating public assassination of those they don't agree with. It's uncomfortable to view these, as if murder is OK, and that he asked for it, karma payback, etc.
 
Is it?

He says in the text chain I posted that “ Dad’s been pretty diehard MAGA” since Trump returned to office.

He dropped out of one college, enrolled in a vocational college closer to home (same town) and as far as “polarized in a very different direction”, the only fact we have is that he fell in love with another guy who’s transitioning to female.
And allegedly learned to text message like he was a civil war soldier writing to his partner back home.

Dearest love, I fear that I shalt be detained for a fortnight whilst waiting for yon constable to vacate the premises such that I might retrieve my trusty musket. Indeed, ‘‘twas I who did the deed.

The alleged text exchange is…as the actual cohort might say, sus.
 
And allegedly learned to text message like he was a civil war soldier writing to his partner back home.

Dearest love, I fear that I shalt be detained for a fortnight whilst waiting for yon constable to vacate the premises such that I might retrieve my trusty musket. Indeed, ‘‘twas I who did the deed.

The alleged text exchange is…as the actual cohort might say, sus.
How can you prove that. iMessages are encrypted. They could have gotten his phone and forged a few texts. We need time stamps from the actual phone not random screen shots.
 
I think that the Pelosi incident should not be part of this argument, as there is all kinds of evidence that there was no break and enter and that the attacker was allowed into the residence. This brings "personal reasons" into play, and makes the subject irrelevant in an analysis of politically based attacks.

DePape (the attacker), questioned by the police (introduced as evidence at his trial. The question—-do you know why you’re in custody?


“DePape answers, "Absolutely." He grows increasingly angry and emotional, claiming that Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats committed crimes to steal the election from Donald Trump. Then, Depape says, "I was going to hold her hostage and get her to tell the truth. If she didn't tell the truth, I'd break her kneecaps."


But we exclude that from political violence because Paul Pelosi OPENED THE GODDAMN DOOR? Is that what you’re saying?


Because not only is that insane, it’s also completely, totally factually wrong:


“The Capitol Police video shows DePape walk up to a glass-panel door, leave and then return wearing a large backpack and carrying two other bags. He set all the items down and pulled out a hammer, pausing to put on gloves, and used it to smash the door glass so he could step through an opening.”



And let’s not forget this gem:

IMG_1566.jpeg


 
Last edited:
DePape (the attacker), questioned by the police (introduced as evidence at his trial. The question—-do you know why you’re in custody?


“DePape answers, "Absolutely." He grows increasingly angry and emotional, claiming that Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats committed crimes to steal the election from Donald Trump. Then, Depape says, "I was going to hold her hostage and get her to tell the truth. If she didn't tell the truth, I'd break her kneecaps."


But we exclude that from political violence because Paul Pelosi opened the goddamn door? Is that what you’re saying?


Because not only is that insane, it’s also completely wrong:


“The Capitol Police video shows DePape walk up to a glass-panel door, leave and then return wearing a large backpack and carrying two other bags. He set all the items down and pulled out a hammer, pausing to put on gloves, and used it to smash the door glass so he could step through an opening.”



And let’s not forget this gem:

View attachment 10370


Watch out you might get cancelled.
 
But even one person who feels that the assassination of another person is OK is wrong. The poll shows that a significant percentage of mostly young people do think it is totally or possibly acceptable.
I think a few people are elated just because our country is so divided that they feel happy when someone on the other side gets killed. I see it on social media, but haven't seen it too much elsewhere. Someone said there were a lot of comments about it in the YouTube video for the Wizard of Oz scene "ding ding, the witch is dead."
 
Controlling the content is limited to FCC regulated broadcasting, thank goodness. With streaming, and the decline of broadcast television, opposing views are still out there. Bill Maher isn't going anywhere, and you can't control the Internet.

Yes (and the details will have to be discussed at some other time), the Internet can be controlled for most people. Russia and China do that quite well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom