Mike, I'm sorry - I thought I had made it clear my post was about the availability of HD in Ford vehicles, which is priced at $279 plus an "estimated" $50 installation fee. I'm aware that HD radios IN GENERAL (not General Motors) have been available under $100, although none that I'd want to listen to for a prolonged period of time. If the basic pro-HD argument is superiority of sound over analog, listening to it on a plastic box with 4-inch speakers hardly seems logical.
I would agree that consolidation in the industry has led to fewer choices and much blander, boring programming, and you and I agree about whether programming drives the radio-listening bus (and I would add, as you might not, NOT technology.) But HD2 and HD3 only offer TWO more channels while sat-radio offers far more choice, commercial-free. Yes, I know the subchannels don't have spots (yet) but the public's perception, like it or not, is terrestrial radio = commercials, satcasters = no commercials. Which is why they pay a relatively modest sum for the services.
The blend may be "transparent" on FM, but it sure as hell ain't on AM, which was what I was referring to.
I would agree that consolidation in the industry has led to fewer choices and much blander, boring programming, and you and I agree about whether programming drives the radio-listening bus (and I would add, as you might not, NOT technology.) But HD2 and HD3 only offer TWO more channels while sat-radio offers far more choice, commercial-free. Yes, I know the subchannels don't have spots (yet) but the public's perception, like it or not, is terrestrial radio = commercials, satcasters = no commercials. Which is why they pay a relatively modest sum for the services.
The blend may be "transparent" on FM, but it sure as hell ain't on AM, which was what I was referring to.