• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Angry White Men

N

NewTalkVoice

Guest
Quick question for the Beantown faithful:

Does ANY manager allow for interesting, humorous talk any more? I have almost 30 years in the radio/tv biz, did news in Boston years ago, and now just switched to talk in a medium market. I do it the way we always did it, current events, fun, politics, etc a good mix. It's working great here, but I think most radio managers are afraid to go away from the 'formula'. I lead into Rush, Hannity and Savage, yet I don't rant over local politicians like it seems Boston and Prov hosts do. I've been very successful doing it this way. Are their others in Boston doing 'normal' talk?

Thanks

Jim
 
NewTalkVoice said:
Does ANY manager allow for interesting, humorous talk any more? I have almost 30 years in the radio/tv biz, did news in Boston years ago, and now just switched to talk in a medium market. I do it the way we always did it, current events, fun, politics, etc a good mix. It's working great here, but I think most radio managers are afraid to go away from the 'formula'. I lead into Rush, Hannity and Savage, yet I don't rant over local politicians like it seems Boston and Prov hosts do. I've been very successful doing it this way. Are their others in Boston doing 'normal' talk?

WBZ's talkers seem to mix it up a bit. It's not all hard-core politics all the time, plenty of discussion of other current events too, at least in the evening. Not usually awake in overnights.
 
Sorry, but 99% of all local talk is formulaic to aim at the lowest common demoninator. It is pure reactionary radio. The days of pro-active and thoughtful talk - "normal talk" as you called it are gone.
As noted in other post today's talk is predictable on just about every issue and therefore boring to anyone who can think for himself [ or herself]. Simple put local talk apes national with the same mantra - republicans are good and democrats are bad. What a yawn!
Most radio suits don't care as long as it makes money and most listeners are too stupid to think for themselves.
Again, quoting H.L. Menchen ' you will never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the average American.'
And so the state of talk radio today. A vast wasteland.

NewTalkVoice said:
Quick question for the Beantown faithful:

Does ANY manager allow for interesting, humorous talk any more? I have almost 30 years in the radio/tv biz, did news in Boston years ago, and now just switched to talk in a medium market. I do it the way we always did it, current events, fun, politics, etc a good mix. It's working great here, but I think most radio managers are afraid to go away from the 'formula'. I lead into Rush, Hannity and Savage, yet I don't rant over local politicians like it seems Boston and Prov hosts do. I've been very successful doing it this way. Are their others in Boston doing 'normal' talk?

Thanks

Jim
 
Most radio suits don't care as long as it makes money and most listeners are too stupid to think for themselves.

Unless, of course, the host agrees with you, in which case the host becomes brilliant, cogent, and spot on. Gaed, this mantra of your's grows wearisome.


Again, quoting H.L. Menchen ' you will never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the average American.'

Actually, you're quoting yourself, because Menchen never said or wrote this, as you have been informed previously by a reliable poster. Menchen's quote is "'Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." The

And so the state of talk radio today. A vast wasteland.
 
Oops...let's try this again.

Most radio suits don't care as long as it makes money and most listeners are too stupid to think for themselves.

Unless, of course, the host agrees with you, in which case the host becomes brilliant, cogent, and spot on. Gawd, this mantra of your's grows wearisome.

Again, quoting H.L. Menchen ' you will never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the average American.'

Actually, you're quoting yourself, because Menchen never said or wrote this, as you have been informed previously by a reliable poster. Menchen's quote is "'Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." The quote you may have been searching for was "No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people." Since Menchen hasn't said anything new since around 1956, it must be one or the other.

Of course, Menchen was wrong on both counts, as the previousl owners of AAR, your neighborhood Yugo dealer, the inventor of Flooz, and the marketers of New Coke can readily attest.

And so the state of talk radio today. A vast wasteland.

Yawn.

Regards,
TSB
 
Angry white men? That's not a nice thing to call liberals (who are predominantly white, at least, as
surveys have shown) :)

>>Unless, of course, the host agrees with you, in which case the host becomes brilliant, cogent, and spot on

True--I'll defend Howie Carr and the libs will defend Rachel Madcow, Big Dumb Ed,
Stephanie "No Thanks Dad" Miller, etc.

>>A Vast wasteland

Not like TV, which has intelligent talk about Brittney, OJ, Brangelina... :)
 
raccoonradio said:
Angry white men? That's not a nice thing to call liberals (who are predominantly white, at least, as
surveys have shown) :)

>>Unless, of course, the host agrees with you, in which case the host becomes brilliant, cogent, and spot on

True--I'll defend Howie Carr and the libs will defend Rachel Madcow, Big Dumb Ed,
Stephanie "No Thanks Dad" Miller, etc.

Liberals right now are some of the angriest people I've ever seen. The angriest "white people" I have ever seen. Probably bummed that the 60's are over! LOL

This is merely an example of "transference": applying your feelings to someone else (who isn't actually feeling that way). Besides, freedom of speech should be just that. I'll defend the right of Howie Carr or Rosie or Imus or Rush or Cindee Sheehan to express their opinion. That's what we are supposed to be all about here in the USA. It's what differentiates us from places like the Islamic Republic of Iran.

raccoonradio said:
>>A Vast wasteland

Not like TV, which has intelligent talk about Brittney, OJ, Brangelina... :)

Oh, and let's not forget that fine intellectual known as Paris Hilton. They're covering her every bowel movement! Very, very educational and thought-provoking stuff. Spot on, Raccoon! ;)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom