• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

As much as I hate to start a new CW thread...

D

DiamondJoe

Guest
... it could be one of the last.

New York Post reports a new network name is in the works before its September launch.

Word is that the name of the new network created by the merger of the WB and UPN — the CW — does not have long to live.

Execs at the new net say there may be a change, despite the insistence of CBS boss Les Moonves that they'd stick with the clumsy name.

Already, jokes are flying about "the WC" (short for water closet) and that CW stood for "Could Work" network.

The name was created by combining the C from CBS, parent company of the old UPN, and the W from the WB...
<P ID="signature">______________


New York City Radio and TV</P>
 
> ... it could be one of the last.
>
> New York Post reports a new network name is in the works
> before its September launch.

Would you trust the Post about this?
They are an arm of Rupert Murdoch's evil empire, you know the one that abruptly pulled the UPN logo from the UPN affils they own.
Also, the Post tends to get a lot of things wrong or just plain lies. Perhaps you can find a real newspaper as a source?<P ID="signature">______________
<a href=http://www.triborough.org/blog/>Random Observations on Life, the Universe and Television</a></P>
 
> ... it could be one of the last.
>
> New York Post reports a new network name is in the works
> before its September launch.
>
> Word is that the name of the new network created by the
> merger of the WB and UPN — the CW — does not have long to
> live.
>
> Execs at the new net say there may be a change, despite the
> insistence of CBS boss Les Moonves that they'd stick with
> the clumsy name.
>
> Already, jokes are flying about "the WC" (short for water
> closet) and that CW stood for "Could Work" network.
>
> The name was created by combining the C from CBS, parent
> company of the old UPN, and the W from the WB...
>
Well, it is a clunky name. . . Maybe they'll actually try to go with something other than a set of initials? Just because it's traditional doesn't mean you HAVE to do it that way.

(Yes, I know Fox isn't a set of initials, but it's short enough to be one.)
 
> > ... it could be one of the last.
> >
> > New York Post reports a new network name is in the works
> > before its September launch.
>
> Would you trust the Post about this?
> They are an arm of Rupert Murdoch's evil empire, you know
> the one that abruptly pulled the UPN logo from the UPN
> affils they own.
> Also, the Post tends to get a lot of things wrong or just
> plain lies. Perhaps you can find a real newspaper as a
> source?
>
Not only is that a good point, but I've seen stories written just by something that was said on the discussion board, and then it circulates back here. That's why I'm so strongly against "I heard a rumor" type stuff. And, I find it interesting, that just yesterday, Scott posted that he didn't think "CW" would be the final name. The next day, it's in the Post. You be the judge...
 
>
> Already, jokes are flying about "the WC" (short for water
> closet) and that CW stood for "Could Work" network.

I like "The WMC" Network. Has a nice ring to it. :eek:D
 
> And, I find it
> interesting, that just yesterday, Scott posted that he
> didn't think "CW" would be the final name. The next day,
> it's in the Post. You be the judge...

I have powers I didn't even know I had! :)

But seriously, folks - regardless of the Post's ownership, it does cover the media capital of the free world, and its gossip columnists know their stuff. Their radio columnist, John Mainelli, is one of the best in the business, and their coverage of TV is pretty widely respected in the industry.

It's not brain surgery, in any event, to figure out that Les Moonves and his colleagues up the street at the Time Warner Center really don't want to spend the next nine months hearing "WC" jokes.

(The suggestion I've heard, from at least one wag, that the new network should be called "Blink"? Not buying it...)<P ID="signature">______________
Tower Site Calendar 2006 JUST RELEASED! - <a target="_blank" href=http://www.fybush.com/nerw.html#calendar>www.fybush.com</a></P>
 
The CW = The Children's TV Workshop

> ... it could be one of the last.
>
> New York Post reports a new network name is in the works
> before its September launch.
>
> Word is that the name of the new network created by the
> merger of the WB and UPN — the CW — does not have long to
> live.
>
> Execs at the new net say there may be a change, despite the
> insistence of CBS boss Les Moonves that they'd stick with
> the clumsy name.
>
> Already, jokes are flying about "the WC" (short for water
> closet) and that CW stood for "Could Work" network.
>
> The name was created by combining the C from CBS, parent
> company of the old UPN, and the W from the WB...
>

How about those stations that will not be affiliated with the new The CW, rather than go independent, but go the commercial version of Public TV. An educational TV station that is supported by advertising.

-John L.
 
> (The suggestion I've heard, from at least one wag, that the
> new network should be called "Blink"? Not buying it...)
>

That's even worse? Who'd want their TV network associated with a mediocre "punk" band (who'd probably sue a la Spike Lee anyway) or a Pac-Man ghost? :)
 
> > (The suggestion I've heard, from at least one wag, that
> the
> > new network should be called "Blink"? Not buying it...)
> >
>
> That's even worse? Who'd want their TV network associated
> with a mediocre "punk" band (who'd probably sue a la Spike
> Lee anyway) or a Pac-Man ghost? :)
>
I know you mean to say that "you" think Blink is a mediocre punk band. Whether it's rock music or television, I'm sure you agree that taste is mattter of opinion, not fact.

As for "Blink" as being a name for a network, a certain failed NYC radio station comes to mind. Personally, I'd like to see The Spike Network debut!
 
Re: The CW = The Children's TV Workshop

What makes you say PBS isn't supported by adveritising? Especially when I have to sit through "This edition of NOVA is paid for by.... (insert sponsor here).

>
> How about those stations that will not be affiliated with
> the new The CW, rather than go independent, but go the
> commercial version of Public TV. An educational TV station
> that is supported by advertising.
>
> -John L.
>
 
> (The suggestion I've heard, from at least one wag, that the
> new network should be called "Blink"? Not buying it...)

This has probably already been played, but how about:

"The C Network - CBS without the B S" (although I can see the CBS bigwigs taking offense of that).

They could always call it something along the lines of "IC" (but that would be too close to the so-called "i" network and would leave out Warner Bros.' role in the network).
 
> > > (The suggestion I've heard, from at least one wag, that
> > the
> > > new network should be called "Blink"? Not buying it...)
> > >
> >
> > That's even worse? Who'd want their TV network associated
>
> > with a mediocre "punk" band (who'd probably sue a la Spike
>
> > Lee anyway) or a Pac-Man ghost? :)
> >
> I know you mean to say that "you" think Blink is a mediocre
> punk band. Whether it's rock music or television, I'm sure
> you agree that taste is mattter of opinion, not fact.
>
> As for "Blink" as being a name for a network, a certain
> failed NYC radio station comes to mind. Personally, I'd like
> to see The Spike Network debut!
>
how about "cwbs" named cbs warner broadcasting system<P ID="signature">______________
http://natedoggairchecks.6x.to/
xxnate_doggxx (at) myway (dot) com</P>
 
> >
> > Already, jokes are flying about "the WC" (short for water
> > closet) and that CW stood for "Could Work" network.
>
> I like "The WMC" Network. Has a nice ring to it. :eek:D

I can see it now: The Winter Music Conference and WMC-TV/Memphis going to court over the WMC title(But then again, CBS does own WMC-AM & FM/Memphis). Can you say "Judge Judy"?
 
> ... it could be one of the last.
>
> New York Post reports a new network name is in the works
> before its September launch.

CW= the COUNTRY and WESTERN network. 'Nuff said.
 
Wait!

> I can see it now: The Winter Music Conference and
> WMC-TV/Memphis going to court over the WMC title(But then
> again, CBS does own WMC-AM & FM/Memphis). Can you say "Judge
> Judy"?
>

Wait! There are radio and television stations using my initials?????? I'M SUING!! All of you are witnesses. You are all getting subpoenas. Do not leave this room! They're going down!

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by WMC2005 on 01/28/06 04:02 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Re: Wait!

> > I can see it now: The Winter Music Conference and
> > WMC-TV/Memphis going to court over the WMC title(But then
> > again, CBS does own WMC-AM & FM/Memphis). Can you say
> "Judge
> > Judy"?
> >
>
> Wait! There are radio and television stations using my
> initials?????? I'M SUING!! All of you are witnesses. You
> are all getting subpoenas. Do not leave this room! They're
> going down!
>
Someone being funny? You have top notch lawyers coming to your defence?
Big company, CBS is.
It was funny enough watching Spike almost never air because of a Basketball player trying to say that a TV station can't be named after him...remember that?<P ID="signature">______________
"If you never say NO, How much is your YES worth?"
</P>
 
Somehow I think this ntwork will have a "name", like "Spike" (not that one, obviously).<P ID="signature">______________
Have a Happy New Year!
http://www.thebig8.net/have_a_happy_new_year_with_cklw.mp3</P>
 
WMC or MWC network?

> > Already, jokes are flying about "the WC" (short for water
> > closet) and that CW stood for "Could Work" network.
>
> I like "The WMC" Network. Has a nice ring to it. :eek:D

How about the <font color=red size=5>MWC</font> network.

Featuring reruns of Fox's
<font color=red size=5>M</font>arried ...
<font color=red size=5>W</font>ith
<font color=red size=5>C</font>hildren!

73s from 954<P ID="signature">______________
Prairie Home Companion Coming To Miami in Feb! South Florida Radio Pages (since 1995)</P>
 
Re: Wait!

> Someone being funny? You have top notch lawyers coming to
> your defence?
> Big company, CBS is.
> It was funny enough watching Spike almost never air because
> of a Basketball player trying to say that a TV station can't
> be named after him...remember that?

I didn't know Spike Lee was a basketball player.

As I said at the time, Spike Jones and Fonzie's
nephew Spike had more enduring significance!

73s from 954<P ID="signature">______________
Prairie Home Companion Coming To Miami in Feb! South Florida Radio Pages (since 1995)</P>
 
Call it Warner-Enterprise -- WEN!

Or even Warner-Enterprise --- WEN?

Think "Who's on first?" (You read it here first.)

Costello: "What station is Star Trek Enterprise on?"

Abbott: "It's on WEN"

Costello: "I know when. Eight o'clock. But what station?"

OR...

How about the Warner Brothers Enterprise Network?

WbEn for short.

;-)

Should go over big in WNY.


73s from 954<P ID="signature">______________
Prairie Home Companion Coming To Miami in Feb! South Florida Radio Pages (since 1995)</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom