Atlanta will now be two for two when it comes to supporting NHL franchises. Sports radio stations should examine why other sun belt markets can have profitable and successful NHL teams and Atlanta has now failed twice.
IIRC, Cuz also was having a problem getting a local TV deal. Remember, this was back in the 2-5-8-11-17-30-36-46 pre-cable days. Channel 69 was also still in the future.RoddyFreeman said:I don't agree with your basic premise, that Atlanta doesn't support hockey teams. The Flames were sold because owner Tom Cousins was in financial trouble and needed money. The Thrashers haven't been supported by the fans because the owners have put out an inferior product year after year.
I wouldn't think that the region around Atlanta would support a hockey team if they won the Stanley Cup three years in a row. It's not a sport that children in the South care to become involved in (primarily because of the predominance of football and baseball) or have the ability to become involved in (how many southern cities have a hockey rink?). And it's not a sport that adults in the South care about, either, because of football and baseball interest.
I say "the South" and not Atlanta specifically because, as an example, the Braves would not be the popular team that they are today if it wasn't for Ted Turner's role in building a massive regional and national TV audience for them. Every kid on my block in Anniston, Alabama owns at least one Braves shirt or piece of memorabilia, but the closest place you could buy some sort of Thrashers gear is probably Douglasville.
RADIO TRUTH said:You could not be more wrong. Dallas has over 30 ice rinks and over 7000 amateur ice hockey games played in the Dallas area per year. It is just not the transplanted Yankees and Canadians but, native Texans who have an interest in hockey. The Dallas Stars aren't going anywhere. This problem is purely about Atlanta with two failed NHL franchises.
RADIO TRUTH said:I wouldn't think that the region around Atlanta would support a hockey team if they won the Stanley Cup three years in a row. It's not a sport that children in the South care to become involved in (primarily because of the predominance of football and baseball) or have the ability to become involved in (how many southern cities have a hockey rink?). And it's not a sport that adults in the South care about, either, because of football and baseball interest.
I say "the South" and not Atlanta specifically because, as an example, the Braves would not be the popular team that they are today if it wasn't for Ted Turner's role in building a massive regional and national TV audience for them. Every kid on my block in Anniston, Alabama owns at least one Braves shirt or piece of memorabilia, but the closest place you could buy some sort of Thrashers gear is probably Douglasville.
You could not be more wrong. Dallas has over 30 ice rinks and over 7000 amateur ice hockey games played in the Dallas area per year. It is just not the transplanted Yankees and Canadians but, native Texans who have an interest in hockey. The Dallas Stars aren't going anywhere. This problem is purely about Atlanta with two failed NHL franchises.
whitfm said:I wouldn't think that the region around Atlanta would support a hockey team if they won the Stanley Cup three years in a row. It's not a sport that children in the South care to become involved in (primarily because of the predominance of football and baseball) or have the ability to become involved in (how many southern cities have a hockey rink?). And it's not a sport that adults in the South care about, either, because of football and baseball interest.
I say "the South" and not Atlanta specifically because, as an example, the Braves would not be the popular team that they are today if it wasn't for Ted Turner's role in building a massive regional and national TV audience for them. Every kid on my block in Anniston, Alabama owns at least one Braves shirt or piece of memorabilia, but the closest place you could buy some sort of Thrashers gear is probably Douglasville.
Dallas area has 9 ice rinks, and 7000 amateur hockey games per year, right, not even in North Dakota.
http://www.yellowpages.com/dallas-tx/ice-rinks
Atlanta has 12..
http://www.yellowpages.com/atlanta-ga/ice-rinks?g=Atlanta,+GA&q=ice+rinks
Dallas is a major metropolitan area with lots of amenities that 99 percent of southern towns do not have. The South is comprised of more than Dallas.
jabba17 said:IIRC, Cuz also was having a problem getting a local TV deal. Remember, this was back in the 2-5-8-11-17-30-36-46 pre-cable days. Channel 69 was also still in the future.RoddyFreeman said:I don't agree with your basic premise, that Atlanta doesn't support hockey teams. The Flames were sold because owner Tom Cousins was in financial trouble and needed money. The Thrashers haven't been supported by the fans because the owners have put out an inferior product year after year.
whitfm said:One statistic to confirm what I'm saying about lack of overall southern interest in hockey:
According to ESPN, five of the six NHL teams located in the southeastern United States (Atlanta, Dallas, Florida, Nashville, Carolina) finished between 20th and 28th of 30 teams in average attendance numbers this season (Atlanta was #28). The highest-ranked southern team on the list was Tampa Bay at #18.
Link goodness: http://espn.go.com/nhl/attendance
landtuna said:whitfm said:One statistic to confirm what I'm saying about lack of overall southern interest in hockey:
According to ESPN, five of the six NHL teams located in the southeastern United States (Atlanta, Dallas, Florida, Nashville, Carolina) finished between 20th and 28th of 30 teams in average attendance numbers this season (Atlanta was #28). The highest-ranked southern team on the list was Tampa Bay at #18.
Link goodness: http://espn.go.com/nhl/attendance
I can't speak for Atlanta or Dallas but in Phoenix we have a sizable hockey fan base as evidenced by the long tenure of the old RoadRunners but when the NHL came to town they made several stupid decisions.
1. Located the building on the West (read 'poor') side of town where the major Hispanic population lives - not a lot of hockey fans living close by. They had an option to locate the building at the eastside crossroads convenient to both public transportation and two intersecting freeways but noooooo. It was decided to place yet another generic shopping mall at that site and put the hockey building out in the pasture lands.
2. Scheduled the majority of their games on weekday evenings where it is almost impossible for fans to get off work then get a bite to eat then get to the stadium in time for face-off.
3. Average drive time to the stadium from anywhere east of central Phoenix is in excess of 40 minutes and possibly a lot more depending on how far out one is. In short, a terrible commute with no public transportation available.
4. Within the first two years virtually disassembled the relocated team and sold off all the stars making the team non-competitive. Over time this has been reversed but the financial troubles left over from those days almost guarantee that the salary cap will always be a huge burden for this team.
5. Hired a former star as coach then manager (Gretzky) who (a) didn't live anywhere near Phoenix, (b) did virtually no marketing for the team (c) couldn't coach.
Fans here will support sports teams but only if they feel they are getting their monies worth. They haven't. With everything else going wrong the team has to at least win and they haven't.
This is a textbook case of mismanagement by virtually everyone involved.