• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Bally RSN owner Sinclair looking at bankruptcy

Let’s say Manfred is right and MLB takes over. This needs to be a joint agreement with other leagues. Unless each league starts their own network per team.
If the bankruptcy court judge simply voids the contracts and de facto shuts down the RSNs, what would there be to save?
 
Let’s say Manfred is right and MLB takes over. This needs to be a joint agreement with other leagues. Unless each league starts their own network per team.

First of all, the league has its own network: The MLB Network. Just as all of the other pro sports have their own networks. So that framework already exists, and each network runs games from each of their teams.

Secondly, as I mentioned, some teams have started their own RSNs, such as NESN or MASN. All I hear Manfred saying is that they are prepared to do more of this, both through MLB Network and through teams starting their own nets.

If the bankruptcy court judge simply voids the contracts and de facto shuts down the RSNs, what would there be to save?

In a Chapter 11, the intent is to restructure, not shut the company down. The judge voids the contracts so the company is able to start over. Typically, the company comes into the hearing with prepared contracts that will replace the ones being voided. But once again, since there has been no filing, we don't know what the company or judge is going to do yet.
 
MLB network can’t handle every teams games. They need regional networks. Who controls them is the question. I doubt every team starts their own network. It only works in bigger markets.
 
Yankees, Mets, Red Sox, Orioles, Cubs, Dodgers. Those are the only team run networks.

Well Mets is controlled by former ownership.
 
MLB network can’t handle every teams games. They need regional networks. Who controls them is the question. I doubt every team starts their own network. It only works in bigger markets.

We will see what happens. As I said, Manfred says they're prepared to step in where needed. He didn't say how. So we'll find out.
 
I don't see how. Bally also does NHL and college sports. All are affected.
It would have to be a sub license? The majority of the content on these networks is baseball. Unless all the affected leagues go in equally.

College sports are usually syndicated licensed.
 
It would have to be a sub license? The majority of the content on these networks is baseball. Unless all the affected leagues go in equally.

College sports are usually syndicated licensed.

As I said, a chap11 begins with all contracts voided. Read this:

 
As I said, a chap11 begins with all contracts voided.
That’s why I’m wondering if the leagues can step in first and do a restructuring of the debt before it goes to bankruptcy. Can they take over the finances.

They can’t afford these networks to go belly up.
 
As I said, a chap11 begins with all contracts voided. Read this:

Therein lies the problem. If cable and satellite retransmission contracts are voided, who would the RSNs be broadcasting to? Themselves? Cable companies won’t keep running them by the honor system, not when they and the RSNs themselves have repeatedly played hardball in long carriage disputes.
We will see what happens. As I said, Manfred says they're prepared to step in where needed. He didn't say how. So we'll find out.
He likely didn’t say how because MLB doesn’t know yet how to get out of this situation and might have no feasible or realistic solution. But he can’t tell people any of that as it would create even more of a mess.
 
That’s why I’m wondering if the leagues can step in first and do a restructuring of the debt before it goes to bankruptcy. Can they take over the finances.

They can’t afford these networks to go belly up.

Sounds like the leagues are in a bit of a conundrum. They want someone...Whether that be RSNs or another carrier to air their games, but on the other hand, Bally Sports, at least, seems short on cash - at a time when the NBA is about to renegotiate their TV and media rights.. If the recent, similar negotiations involving the NFL are any indication, the NBA may be hoping to greatly increase, perhaps double what they're currently getting. That's difficult to leverage if there's no networks or RSNs or carriers interested in or financially capable of doing it. While this article below doesn't mention games of individual teams and RSNs like Bally Sports, it does make it clear that the NBA is expecting a huge payday during the upcoming TV/broadcast/media rights negotiations:
In the upcoming long-term TV deal negotiations, the NBA will seek a $50-75 billion deal. It would double or triple its current 9-year, $24 billion deal signed in 2014 with Disney's ABC/ESPN and Warner Bros. Discovery's TNT pays the league $2.6 billion a year.

According to the report, Amazon has made it clear it wants to secure the NBA package.
"Amazon is locked and loaded for a shot at the NBA," said a source.
It is estimated that the exclusive streaming-only package could include 20-40 regular season games. That would make 1-2 games per week.
 
Sounds like the leagues are in a bit of a conundrum. They want someone...Whether that be RSNs or another carrier to air their games, but on the other hand, Bally Sports, at least, seems short on cash - at a time when the NBA is about to renegotiate their TV and media rights.. If the recent, similar negotiations involving the NFL are any indication, the NBA may be hoping to greatly increase, perhaps double what they're currently getting. That's difficult to leverage if there's no networks or RSNs or carriers interested in or financially capable of doing it. While this article below doesn't mention games of individual teams and RSNs like Bally Sports, it does make it clear that the NBA is expecting a huge payday during the upcoming TV/broadcast/media rights negotiations:
Those are national broadcast deals. ESPN/TNT. Not the deals each team has with the RSNs
 
Therein lies the problem. If cable and satellite retransmission contracts are voided, who would the RSNs be broadcasting to?

Typically this is a two-step process, where the contracts are voided and immediately renewed. Judges don't just blow things up. That's counter to the goal of restructuring. But once again, we don't know what will happen until it's filed.
He likely didn’t say how because MLB doesn’t know yet how to get out of this situation and might have no feasible or realistic solution. But he can’t tell people any of that as it would create even more of a mess.

He didn't say how because the bankruptcy hasn't been filed. All he can say is they're prepared to do something.
 
Here's one example of what happened during the Cumulus bankruptcy. Their contract with the Chicago White Sox was deemed to be unprofitable, and was cut:


Here's a follow-up from MLB:

 
Those are national broadcast deals. ESPN/TNT. Not the deals each team has with the RSNs
Correct, and that was mentioned in my comments above. Point being, it seems the NBA and their teams expect to make $$$ from TV broadcast rights and the like, but Bally Sports at least, isn't in a place financially to make that happen and they're about to declare bankruptcy. At least in some markets, if Bally folds, your best and perhaps only option as a viewer would be to pay to see the games via streaming, unless someone can figure out how to make a go of it financially and otherwise.

Our Bally RSN which carries NBA and MLB games, fills a lot of their spot loads with buys from non-profits that they're probably not making much $$ on - Disabled American Veternans, St. Jude's, Shriner's Hospitals, save the animals and the like. They also have a few lawfirms and casinos here and there.
 
Correct, and that was mentioned in my comments above. Point being, it seems the NBA and their teams expect to make $$$ from TV broadcast rights and the like, but Bally Sports at least, isn't in a place financially to make that happen and they're about to declare bankruptcy. At least in some markets, if Bally folds, your best and perhaps only option as a viewer would be to pay to see the games via streaming, unless someone can figure out how to make a go of it financially and otherwise.

Our Bally RSN which carries NBA and MLB games, fills a lot of their spot loads with buys from non-profits that they're probably not making much $$ on - Disabled American Veternans, St. Jude's, Shriner's Hospitals, save the animals and the like. They also have a few lawfirms and casinos here and there.
You can’t stream the games if there is no production of the games. They need a broadcaster to produce them. This is what the RSNs do.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom