imhomerjay said:Would that be more screwed than they already were?
Shame too. I actually like alot of their shows more than IP. But how long can this station last?
imhomerjay said:Would that be more screwed than they already were?
On another thread, you were very concerned with "PEN's cost" yet you don't seem to have the same concern with the cost for 94 IP with the Phils. BTW - I think it is a huge win for 94 to get the Phils and I do think they will recoup the cost. I just noticed a double standard at play.Pab Sungenis said:There are a few holes in Philly, but the problem is that they are very niche holes with small audiences. Such as the much trumpeted "dance" or "country classics" formats (which would not attract enough listeners to survive more than a book or two), modern oldies (too much overlap with WBEN-FM at the moment), hard alternative (overlap with WRFF and occasionally WMMR).
Plus, remember that for all its pretenses, WPEN-FM is still a move-in out of market station. Not quite a rimshot but not a full-market powerhouse. The possibilities for them are limited in Philly.
Pab Sungenis said:Plus, remember that for all its pretenses, WPEN-FM is still a move-in out of market station. Not quite a rimshot but not a full-market powerhouse. The possibilities for them are limited in Philly.
MDefl said:On another thread, you were very concerned with "PEN's cost" yet you don't seem to have the same concern with the cost for 94 IP with the Phils. BTW - I think it is a huge win for 94 to get the Phils and I do think they will recoup the cost. I just noticed a double standard at play.