• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Bay Area Country Radio Station

Unfortunately, KRTY has less than 1kW, and so, only serves the south bay.

95.7 The Bear / The Wolf had a crappy signal to the south. 95.7 has got to be one of the worst signals in the bay area. Not sure which we had more of, static or modulation. I don't mean to bag on 95.7, but there are a few frequency's that are just awful in getting down here to the south bay. You'd think the water (from the bay) would help boost/skip the signal, but nope!!!
Salt water enhances AM coverage. It does nothing per se for FM, though. The only benefit the bay has on FM is that it is totally flat and has no obstructions to block signals.
Put country on a good frequency, and it will do well.
No, it won't. The main reason is that such a high percentage of the total market is not non-Hispanic white later generation Americans. Hispanics, Blacks, Asians and immigrants not falling into those categories like Persians, Russians, Armenians and Arabs. What you have left is a small market, hindered by no lifestyle in the market.
104.5 will not cut it. I think to cover the entire bay area with a good signal, the station/transmitter would have to be high up, and be in a location that can overlook the entire bay region with at least 50kW output. 100.3 comes to mind. 97.7 might work, but would have to increase the output power!
There is little or no room for improvement with any local FM stations.

Also, FM coverage is a combination of height and power. Increase power for an existing station and your have to decrease antenna height.
If KRTY increased to 5-7kW, it might be able to cover area's further north as it is up on top of a hill (875Ft), but the cost of ownership/maintenance would increase to.
But it can't. First, it is a Class A, and could never, ever be more than 6 kw*. Second, it has to conform with the Class A standard of 6 kw at 100 meters. Increase height, decrease power.

The cost increase of going up a couple of KW in ERP means, with antenna gain, perhaps a 2 kw or 3 kw / hours of additional consumption... maybe $12 a day, depending on local utility rates. At San Francisco ad rates, that is a couple of 30" spots a month to pay the extra power bill. And the station vehicle costs a lot more than the little transmitter needed for such power levels... even if such were possible, which is not the case.

Remember, there are a lot of radio pros here who can answer your questions!

* Unless they change class, and that involves protection to co-channel, adjacent and second adjacent channels.
 
Last edited:
KRTY probably can't because they have to protect Vacaville (KUIC).
 
There's still the possibility of a Class C4 but there wouldn't be that much improvement.
In this area it would be a Class B2, but as far as I know this far fetched idea wasn’t even considering an equivalent for this zone. If it were to happen AND the spacing would work, they would only be able to essentially double the ERP which would probably only extend the 70dbu 2-3 miles on a standard FCC map.
 
KRTY probably can't because they have to protect Vacaville (KUIC).
Besides, I live in San Francisco and where I live. I can hear both KUIC and KRTY. Depending on the weather/atmospheric conditions. KUIC and KRTY tends to fight each other sometimes if I move few feet away on the street.
 
Can you hear KRTY in San Francisco?
As far as Nielsen is concerned, KRTY is IN San Francisco.

However, the KRTY 65 dbu signal is does not have any market coverage outside of Santa Clara County. So, unless a lot of Peninsula and East Bay folks are streaming them, the OTA coverage is really limited.
 
As far as Nielsen is concerned, KRTY is IN San Francisco.

However, the KRTY 65 dbu signal is does not have any market coverage outside of Santa Clara County. So, unless a lot of Peninsula and East Bay folks are streaming them, the OTA coverage is really limited.
Actually it does according to L-R. At least 70 in parts of San Mateo and Alameda County south of the San Mateo Bridge.

Alas, FM is a challenge in general when serving the entire market from Santa Rosa down to Gilroy.
 
Actually it does according to L-R. At least 70 in parts of San Mateo and Alameda County south of the San Mateo Bridge.

Alas, FM is a challenge in general when serving the entire market from Santa Rosa down to Gilroy.
Note that the signal in those maps is at its best over the water. The moment you get inland just a matter of blocks, it declines. That is why outside of small numbers in the southernmost ZIP Codes of Alameda and San Mateo counties, there is historical (diary) evidence of essentially no listening.
 
Does KRTY broadcast in HD? If so, sideband interference may partially explain 95.7's signal issues in the San Jose area.

Many, many years ago, the old Z95.7 (CHR/Pop) earned OK beauty pageant numbers in the San Jose book.
 
Excuse my ignorance, but what is L-R? Guessing it might be a website with station coverage contour maps. But I could be way off!
The Longley-Rice model. A radio propagation model that takes into account irregular terrain. You can generate Longley-Rice maps for most FM stations here.

Longley-Rice can be useful in a state like California, where coverage can sometimes go beyond their predicted (60 dBu, even 54 dBu) contours.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom