Happened upon Bernie Ward's blog and saw this post.
http://lionoftheleft.blogspot.com/2011/12/lets-talk.html
It's lengthy, but here are some salient points:
"The Thursday night massacre, which occurred at KGO, was not about ratings or people meters or a company bleeding money. What happened at KGO is the logical conclusion to a process started in 1996 when Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996...
"Cumulus had a problem. It could make more money by getting out of local talk, but face a firestorm of criticism. They decided on a two-step process to achieve their goals. First, fire all the full-time hosts (they would have fired Owens too except for the fact he was smart enough to have a contract which didn't allow it...I bow to his negotiating skills) and pretend to change to an all-news format. Keep some talk on the weekends where niche shows do well. In about a year or less, they will contend they are still losing money and cancel the all-news format and move to syndicated programming. By this time, the passionate listeners who could cause them licensing problems will have moved on. They will abandon any pretense about the local community and bring in shows with no local concerns whatsoever. Cumulus' Thursday night massacre was a bloodletting disguised by a format change in order to get where they really want to go."
I've had that suspicion, too. Many have commented about KCBS and no way KGO can beat them... based on what I've heard of just the first week... not really compelling. Will it improve? Bernie writes:
"With an increase in news coverage one would suspect KGO would hire a number of new reporters and anchors. They will re-open a bureau at San Francisco City Hall and the Hall of Justice... a Sacramento bureau staffed full-time... an East Bay bureau and an expanded South Bay bureau. If they are serious about going all-news, they will spend money, sending reporters to breaking news stories all over the world and nation... The reality is almost none of this will be done. They might hire a new anchor, but more reporters, new bureaus, investigative stories and national coverage will never happen. Instead the news product will [be] lighter and fluffier and will involve ripping and reading more than anything else... This wasn't about ratings or people meters or loss of money. This is about a corporate model which takes advantage of the public airwaves (owned by you) to make a huge profit while ignoring any commitment to the local community. (It’s no accident the new owners dropped the Leukemia Cureathon and tried to get their hands on the money from the Thanksgiving Charity Drive)"
"If you want proof of my theory," he says, "watch and listen."
Any thoughts on what he's saying?
http://lionoftheleft.blogspot.com/2011/12/lets-talk.html
It's lengthy, but here are some salient points:
"The Thursday night massacre, which occurred at KGO, was not about ratings or people meters or a company bleeding money. What happened at KGO is the logical conclusion to a process started in 1996 when Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996...
"Cumulus had a problem. It could make more money by getting out of local talk, but face a firestorm of criticism. They decided on a two-step process to achieve their goals. First, fire all the full-time hosts (they would have fired Owens too except for the fact he was smart enough to have a contract which didn't allow it...I bow to his negotiating skills) and pretend to change to an all-news format. Keep some talk on the weekends where niche shows do well. In about a year or less, they will contend they are still losing money and cancel the all-news format and move to syndicated programming. By this time, the passionate listeners who could cause them licensing problems will have moved on. They will abandon any pretense about the local community and bring in shows with no local concerns whatsoever. Cumulus' Thursday night massacre was a bloodletting disguised by a format change in order to get where they really want to go."
I've had that suspicion, too. Many have commented about KCBS and no way KGO can beat them... based on what I've heard of just the first week... not really compelling. Will it improve? Bernie writes:
"With an increase in news coverage one would suspect KGO would hire a number of new reporters and anchors. They will re-open a bureau at San Francisco City Hall and the Hall of Justice... a Sacramento bureau staffed full-time... an East Bay bureau and an expanded South Bay bureau. If they are serious about going all-news, they will spend money, sending reporters to breaking news stories all over the world and nation... The reality is almost none of this will be done. They might hire a new anchor, but more reporters, new bureaus, investigative stories and national coverage will never happen. Instead the news product will [be] lighter and fluffier and will involve ripping and reading more than anything else... This wasn't about ratings or people meters or loss of money. This is about a corporate model which takes advantage of the public airwaves (owned by you) to make a huge profit while ignoring any commitment to the local community. (It’s no accident the new owners dropped the Leukemia Cureathon and tried to get their hands on the money from the Thanksgiving Charity Drive)"
"If you want proof of my theory," he says, "watch and listen."
Any thoughts on what he's saying?