Julius Leonard Marx said:
BRNout said:
Exactly. On "leave" until we figure out a graceful way out of this for all involved. Management at KYW knows that Lane is damaged goods. But, they've invested so much in her that they have to figure out a way in which to make this look like a smooth transition and to fake some "support" for her.
But, ultimately, she's gone. A station cannot have a news anchor that has been involved in the very public things that Alycia Lane has. Wow, she had it all and has blown it by acting stupid.
And they know she already has a lawyer. They have to cover their asses to avoid a costly wrongful termination suit. Even the I-man got money out of CBS.
Yes, that's very true. These contracts are complicated enough that there is often a little room for interpretation in a case like this. That's part of the "graceful" exit that CBS needs to work toward. "Graceful" in that it doesn't cost them lots of money.
The devil is in the details as far as her contract goes and there is no way for us to know the details at this point. I'm sure that there is a clause that addresses her personal behavior and I suppose that the verbiage in that clause will determine exactly what CBS will do. They may choose to be a bit more generous than they have to be just to avoid wasting time and money in court (even if they may win).
You know, comparisons with Imus are limited in their usefulness here. Imus got canned because he said something that didn't cross any lines that were drawn in his contract. Instead, CBS got scared by outside influences and fired him. He had a great case because his contract allowed (and encouraged) him to say bombastic things. And, Imus was never charged with a crime nor did he run afoul of any standards set by the FCC.
Alycia Lane is a news anchor and, as such, she gets paid a lot of money to act the part. She cannot get mixed up in things that will damage her (and the station's) credibility. They gave her a pass on the bikini thing, though I'd bet a grand that station management had her on the carpet over it and warned her to shape up. But, in this case, she's been charged with a felony. And, the allegations are very ugly. They'll surely be counter to her contractual obligations.
Even if she is found not guilty, the hubbub around the event is enough to trigger her dismissal for acting unprofessionally. We all know that
something happened that night. And then, following it all up with a call to the governor (to pull strings) was even MORE unprofessional. After all this, there is simply no way that she can return to the anchor desk. Too much has happened.
And, imagine the riot in the newsroom if she were allowed back on. Do you think her peers would approve? I seriously doubt it because they all know that they'd be canned for doing things that were not nearly as serious. No, she's done. She may have a great lawyer but she probably has a really lousy case.