Jenny Woo said:
It seems very clear to me that Brenda should not be held to the non-compete; it was executed between her and another company altogether and unless there was a clause allowing for transferrability in the contract it became void when the staions sold.
It seems like CC is trying to reduce operating costs in advance of the sale.
It is so odd to me that corporate is killing what the sales people are selling...no more "live and Local," just VT from elsewhere....
But those contracts carry over. Imagine all the companies that get bought & sold in this country having to re-do every contract they have when the sale is complete. There would be very few transactions. Besides, I'm sure if she had any sort of bonus structure in that same contract, she'd insist it be carried over.
You're using facts not in evidence. The jury will disregard the statement.
Can't have it both ways, I'm afraid.