Johnnyrockin said:It's KDOW as I speak, business news. Really lousy automation screw ups...
No surprise there.... so many stations seem like they couldn't care less about their automation, as long as the money comes in.
Johnnyrockin said:It's KDOW as I speak, business news. Really lousy automation screw ups...
Johnnyrockin said:Really lousy automation screw ups...
BossRadioDJ said:Johnnyrockin said:Really lousy automation screw ups...
Hmm. I wonder if they're using the same automation that KGO does.
(NOTE: This post is not meant as a knock against KGO.)
radioguybroadcasting said:I wonder if they built out the Construction Permit yet?
Construction Permit for a Class B AM Station
Area of Coverage
Hours of Operation Unlimited
Antenna Mode Directional - 2 Patterns
Power 50,000 Watts
Daytime Number of Towers 3
Nighttime Number of Towers 4
Transmitter Location 37° 38' 46" N, 122° 08' 39" W
Construction Permit Granted November 15 2005
Construction Permit Expires November 15 2008
Last FCC Update July 01 2008
theradiokid said:Third: I will tell you that I am blind, and use talking software to post on this forum. This talking software does not let me use google, or any standard search engine very well, and also can read call letters wrong. I mostly search on wikipedia, and radiostationworld.com for radio station info, and when I have trouble, I usually go to the radio-info boards, and ask fellow posters for help.
radioguybroadcasting said:Johnnyrockin said:This station has a construction permit to increase its power to 50 KW day/night from a transmitter site near the KTCT/KFAX locations, north of the San Mateo Bridge on the bay coastline of Hayward. Won't have much of a signal in Contra Costa, but will boom in from Willits to Santa Cruz. [SNIP]
I wonder if they built out the Construction Permit yet?
DanStrassberg said:radioguybroadcasting said:Johnnyrockin said:This station has a construction permit to increase its power to 50 KW day/night from a transmitter site near the KTCT/KFAX locations, north of the San Mateo Bridge on the bay coastline of Hayward. Won't have much of a signal in Contra Costa, but will boom in from Willits to Santa Cruz. [SNIP]
I wonder if they built out the Construction Permit yet?
I believe the sequence of events went like this: 1) Because of the usual NIMBY objections, it was proving impossible to obtain the necessary local building permits to construct the new DA. The same site had originally been proposed as the new site for a different Bay Area AM. (Sorry, I can't remember which one.) 2) Salem threw in the towel, installed the business talk format on 1220, and applied for and was granted the KDOW calls. 3) Radio stocks, including Salem's, tanked because of the global financial collapse.
So I don't think it is quite correct to call the 1220 upgrade a casualty of the current sorry state of radio companies--although, heaven knows, that situation can't be helping!
In any event, here in the Boston area, we also have two financial-talk AMs. One has a decent daytime signal and a passable but less-than-full-market night signal. The other has a fair-to-poor daytime signal and a virtually useless night signal. Most of the programming on both of these stations is leased time and maybe 50% of that is not money/finance oriented. A big portion is paid programming advertising various herbal nostrums. The combination of paid financial talk and paid "health" talk seems to work even though there is no reason for much crossover between the two audiences. Someone mentioned the long departed C-Net Radio as evidence that programming that targets corporate CEOs and CFOs can't work. Well, first off, business/financial talk doesn't really target CEOs and CFOs; it mainly targets individual investors. Secondly, C-Net Radio did not use a pay-to-play business model, and that makes a huge difference in whether these AM signals with minuscule audiences can make the format pay. If Boston is any example, more than half of the AM signals are staying alive with leased time, mostly in foreign languages. Aside from religion, business/health is the ONLY mix of English language programming that appears to be working in leased time. I have heard of a station (in Maine) that is doing it and using the positioner "Health and Wealth Radio." I don't know whether the slogan is trademarked but it would seem appropriate to collect royalties from other stations that idenfy themselves that way.
Johnnyrockin said:Sorry for the whole post quote. Are you kidding me???? You mean someone actually has a complaint about adding another 50KW broadcasting plant to an area that already has two others? (KFAX and KTCT.) I am a licensed amateur radio operator (Ham) and the major concerns for RF exposure are in the VHF and UHF frequency spectrum -- this according to the FCC. The major concern is the 2-meter amateur band and frequencies in that part of the spectrum, the reasoning being that human bodies are "resonant" in that wavelength (approximately 144 MHz) and in the 70 cm amateur band where a human's head is resonant. I know that sounds a bit flakey, but it's based on sensible science. The AM band is of almost no concern from a regulatory standpoint. So either the people objecting to the planned upgrade are using bad science, or the person making that post are using a specious argument. Please site your sources. My guess is that Salem is having a hard time financially.
DanStrassberg said:I believe the sequence of events went like this: 1) Because of the usual NIMBY objections, it was proving impossible to obtain the necessary local building permits to construct the new DA. The same site had originally been proposed as the new site for a different Bay Area AM. (Sorry, I can't remember which one.) 2) Salem threw in the towel, installed the business talk format on 1220, and applied for and was granted the KDOW calls. 3) Radio stocks, including Salem's, tanked because of the global financial collapse.