I think this discussion about the proper way to identify the various “loops” goes to a much deeper issue about the lack of planning for valley freeways. Whoever created the entire "Loop" system in Phoenix must have been crazy because the majority of the Loops don't take you anywhere near the city center (the lone exception being the Loop 202 Red Mountain Freeway near downtown). Common sense tells you that the quickest path between two points is a straight line, but the loop system takes you far out of the way to get where you need to be. The Loop system is great for the people that just so happen to live on the outskirts of town by one of the loops, but for the vast majority of people in Phoenix, the loops are an impractical freeway system to get from Point A to Point B. In addition, with the downturn in the economy, higher gas prices and other societal changes, people don't want to live 30 miles plus away from downtown. Take for example the Loop 303. It's difficult to see who exactly will benefit from that freeway besides retirees in Sun City West and the Texas Rangers playing baseball out at Surprise Ballpark. Valley freeway planners think the population is going to continue to grow on the fringes, but I think this is a misguided formula for planning future freeways in Phoenix.
Funny thing is, the freeways that would have benefited valley commuters the most, particularly the Paradise Freeway along Camelback Road in north-central Phoenix, got scrapped because of funding issues. As it is right now, ADOT has no plans to improve the freeway infrastructure around downtown Phoenix. As the population continues to grow, the pressure on the key freeway routes will continue to increase (key routes being Interstate 10, Interstate 17, State Route 51, U.S. 60 and the Loop 202 from the 101 to downtown).
So, going back on topic, I can't blame Detour Dan Beach and other traffic reporters for not having universal terminology for identifying traffic problems on the "Loop" system. In most cities, it’s easy. Take for example Chicago. Most traffic reporters there say “inbound on the Kennedy” or “outbound on the Stevenson” followed by the number of minutes to a given destination. I find this form of traffic reporting to be the best because it specifically tells you, in laymen’s terms, where you’re going (either toward downtown or away from downtown), what freeway you’re on (instead of Interstate 90 it’s the Kennedy Expressway) and how long it will take you to get there (i.e. 20 minutes from O’Hare to downtown). Why traffic reporters don’t do that here is beyond me, but the Loop system doesn’t help things either since those freeways doesn’t even head downtown, except for the 202 Red Mountain freeway.
Also, I know casual drivers and visitors from out of town have to be confused by the loop system. For example, say you want to tell somebody to go to Bass Pro Shop at the 202 and Dobson Road. A confused driver might mistake that to be the 202 Santan Freeway and Dobson in Chandler instead of the 202 Red Mountain Freeway in Mesa. It also doesn't help that ADOT, for whatever reason, does not put the freeway names on exit signs for the loops. In addition, most of the "Loop" signs don't indicate which city the freeway is going to. The lone exception is signs for the Loop 202 - Red Mountain Freeway eastbound leaving the Sky Harbor airport. Take, for example, the Loop 202 East signs coming from downtown via the eastbound Interstate 10. All it says is "Loop 202 East". What it should say is "Loop 202 East - Tempe, Mesa". All other normal freeways say which city you’re heading to, so why doesn't the Loop system do it? Creating driver confusion must be the goal of ADOT. ;D
All in all, I think the "Loop" system may have made sense to ADOT planners in the 1980's, but here in the year 2011, the entire system is trivial and confusing. Don't feel bad Detour Dan if you can't find the proper way to pronounce an accident on the outer-loop 101!
