Trying to produce a topical late night show that appeals equally to fans and detractors of the current administration sounds like a surefire way to get a 0 share.
Sorry, but there are a lot of women who also watch sports (and female sports watchers outnumber me in my family).
Not sure why you want to be argumentative when I was making a simple point.
The proof is in the pudding as evidenced by the content of his nightly show. To any objective viewer, it’s a directed appeal to only one half of the nation’s available audience. (And I’m no fan of either political party.)Because it's wrong. Colbert said last night that show is about love. He loves everybody.
and may be obsolete in the current environment, you're either too soft or too hard on the current adminIt’s no wonder that Johnny Carson and his big-tent approach is viewed as the pinnacle in late night broadcasting.
It’s no wonder that Johnny Carson and his big-tent approach is viewed as the pinnacle in late night broadcasting.
Look at any show and tell me how big the staff is. Soap Operas probably have just as many.In his speech, he said 200 people worked on the show. That should tell you something.
Yeah, but that number includes tech crew, graphics folks, pages, the folks outside who corral audience attendees until they're seated, staff who answer ticket requests, music arranger(s) or licensing coordinators, security, building maintenance, admins, etc. etc. People who don't show up on camera, but are essential to the smooth operation of the program. Any of the other shows has similar behind-the-scenes support staff, even if their number doesn't quite make it to 200.In his speech, he said 200 people worked on the show. That should tell you something.
Yeah, but that number includes tech crew, graphics folks, pages, the folks outside who corral audience attendees until they're seated, staff who answer ticket requests, music arranger(s) or licensing coordinators, security, building maintenance, admins, etc. etc.
SNL costs 1 million an episode.Yeah, but that number includes tech crew, graphics folks, pages, the folks outside who corral audience attendees until they're seated, staff who answer ticket requests, music arranger(s) or licensing coordinators, security, building maintenance, admins, etc. etc. People who don't show up on camera, but are essential to the smooth operation of the program. Any of the other shows has similar behind-the-scenes support staff, even if their number doesn't quite make it to 200.
It's not, all a cop out to get the merger approved.I get all that, but the staff that and the expense of the Ed Sullivan Theater are why the show is losing money. Not because of ratings.
Was the show making money five years ago? Ten years ago? (Hint: if it wasn't, it would never have made it to its tenth anniversary.) Was Letterman's show making money for 22 years? He was also leasing the Ed Sullivan bldg. The problem isn't the cost of that lease (unless CBS raised the price astronomically recently) or the amount of staff, it's that the advertising market for network TV has virtually collapsed. I agree the show's likely losing money, but call balls and strikes fairly. Colbert doesn't sell the ad time on his show, that's CBS. If they can't sell enough ads -- and the OTA end product doesn't support that assumption -- or they can't get their price and have to cut deals to fill the time, that's also not Colbert's making. Not when they're trying to sell the top-rated late night show.I get all that, but the size of the staff that and the expense of the Ed Sullivan Theater are why the show is losing money. Not because of ratings.
I seriously doubt the budget is that low per episode. Especially once all the overhead costs are accounted for. They do 20 or 22 live shows a year. Studio 8A is dedicated to SNL for a large part of the year. How much do you think that costs the SNL budget, distributed over 20 or 22 new shows? Set designers, carpenters, painters, movers, tech crew, all that overhead I detailed above (in #27) for Colbert's show (much of which, by the way, is union)? One Mil per episode, fully loaded, doesn't pass the sniff test.SNL costs 1 million an episode.
The world has changed. There’s a lot less middle ground—not saying it’s good, bad, or indifferent, but the schisms have grown considerably since Mr. Carson was doing his thing. It’s naive to think someone could do that same routine now and have comparable success. Then layer in the added competition that Carson spent much of his career not dealing with. The phrase apples-to-oranges comes to mind.It’s no wonder that Johnny Carson and his big-tent approach is viewed as the pinnacle in late night broadcasting.
We're also long past the era when the President and other top politicians held themselves to a standard of speech, behavior, and decorum where the most you could joke about was them tripping on the stairs of a plane or wearing the wrong color of suit.The world has changed. There’s a lot less middle ground—not saying it’s good, bad, or indifferent, but the schisms have grown considerably since Mr. Carson was doing his thing. It’s naive to think someone could do that same routine now and have comparable success.
Oh, I agree. But the Colbert/Kimmel late night shows began their decline when they decided to go full-on political for one side instead of the big tent with its bigger audiences. I also suspect it’s also the “United States of NewYork/Hollywood” mentality.The world has changed. There’s a lot less middle ground—not saying it’s good, bad, or indifferent, but the schisms have grown considerably since Mr. Carson was doing his thing. It’s naive to think someone could do that same routine now and have comparable success. Then layer in the added competition that Carson spent much of his career not dealing with. The phrase apples-to-oranges comes to mind.
Oh, I agree. But the Colbert/Kimmel late night shows began their decline when they decided to go full-on political for one side instead of the big tent with its bigger audiences.
He said that it used to be about love.,..Because it's wrong. Colbert said last night that show is about love. He loves everybody.
That however can’t be separated from what was happening in technology and the ever expanding amount of content available on multiple devices. And as noted above, the big tent idea is almost a unicorn.Oh, I agree. But the Colbert/Kimmel late night shows began their decline when they decided to go full-on political for one side instead of the big tent with its bigger audiences. I also suspect it’s also the “United States of NewYork/Hollywood” mentality.
He said that it used to be about love.,..