scooty430 said:
[EDIT-inflammatory content]
The discussion is as to
whether the A to Z is warranted on a station that appeared, when it came back, anxious to shed the do-wop and 60's image that kept the sales demos too high and had resulted, from 2000 through 2005, in a
20% sales decrease while the market was up overall aobut 17%.
I can't see how programming and management would want to go backwards, demo and era-wise. Of course, the differences in opinion among programmers as well as the differences in skills of each individual PD, are what makes some stations win and some win in a lesser scale and some just not win at all.
Were we after a 55+ audience, many of us would be doing things like the very old A to Z weekend to attract those older demos. You know that A to z was originally a classic rock feature, and first done several decades ago. The idea is not new and certainly not creative... even I have borrowed the concept for markets where it was never done!
But we, as an industry, are not after 55+. And we are not after 12+ numbers. The best example in the nation is a hybrid soft AC / nostalgic station in the Tampa market... WDUV. It is consitently far and away the #1 station in 12+, yet nearly all its audience is not just 55+ but 65+. The station, in a smaller market than New York, is around 24th in billing... a good use for a signal that is not quite as good as the more centrally located stations... but it does not bill anywhere like a station with good sales demos.
Nobody here can bully anyone, since you can post just as I can and anyone else can. There are no "winners" or losers, just different opinions. I have simply tried to show you some of the ways the indsutry works: sales demos, ratings, music research, etc., yet you come back, devoid of facts, and tell me I am not "worldly" and have probably never been on an airplane! That's not discussion, it's assumption and borderline ad hominem stone throwing. That's not how to have a discussion.