2Son said:
Well, if I actually had a choice, it would be neither, but that's Belo. When the taped newscast first started for Fox 11 from Channel 3, it looked pretty good. When they went to HD, I hated the new "set", but still like Heather Moore. She and Norman were the only things I liked about the newscast. I do believe they could've hired better talent with the new local newscast here in Tucson (and a better set), but we didn't have a choice. That decision came from Belo, not Tucson.
I had the "pleausre" of checking out the Fox 11 newscast last night, and wow. The first 40 seconds of it had no audio. Then during the lead story about the Democratic Convention the standup at the end of the package from the network reporter was cut mid-sentence. And I thought Fox 10 was bad for the technical gaffes!
The best was the second story of the newscast. It was a remote shot with one of the reporters, but absolutely no mention of where he was. He could have been standing in a field behind the KMSB studios for all I know. The anchor threw it to him with the question "Hillary Clinton won Pima County in the primary, right?" That sloid, hard hitting question was followed by about 10 seconds of blank staring from the field reporter before he finally piped in. His package consisted of a phone interview with a Pima County delegate at the convention in Denver. Thank God they set up a remote for that!
I have literally seen better produced broadcasts from College stations. Why would Belo even waste the money on this garbage?