F
frankc
Guest
Just put 2005 in front of the station's website. For example, Z100.com is 2005.z100.com.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
> Just put 2005 in front of the station's website. For
> example, Z100.com is 2005.z100.com.
>
very nice.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> example, Z100.com is 2005.z100.com.
>
very nice.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
O
OldiesCat
Guest
CC's new web designs...
ok, so then in 4+ months they have to change them all AGAIN to 2006? What's the point?
The re-design is nice but the year thing???
ok, so then in 4+ months they have to change them all AGAIN to 2006? What's the point?
The re-design is nice but the year thing???
Re: CC's new web designs...
I think that's just so they can display the new designs with a hidden link before going live.
> ok, so then in 4+ months they have to change them all AGAIN
> to 2006? What's the point?
>
> The re-design is nice but the year thing???
>
I think that's just so they can display the new designs with a hidden link before going live.
> ok, so then in 4+ months they have to change them all AGAIN
> to 2006? What's the point?
>
> The re-design is nice but the year thing???
>
9
954
Guest
CC's new web designs. -- much ado about nothing
> Just put 2005 in front of the station's website. For
> example, Z100.com is 2005.z100.com.
Big deal. So they added or renamed a server.
And they did it to a bunch of servers at once so...
(1) It was easy to remember / plan / execute.
(2) Geeks like us would make a big deal out of it and get them free publicity for it.
73s from 954
<P ID="signature">______________
The New News/Talk WKAT ... Unforgettable WJNA</P>
> Just put 2005 in front of the station's website. For
> example, Z100.com is 2005.z100.com.
Big deal. So they added or renamed a server.
And they did it to a bunch of servers at once so...
(1) It was easy to remember / plan / execute.
(2) Geeks like us would make a big deal out of it and get them free publicity for it.
73s from 954
<P ID="signature">______________
The New News/Talk WKAT ... Unforgettable WJNA</P>
Re: CC's new web designs...
> I think that's just so they can display the new designs with
> a hidden link before going live.
>
>
> > ok, so then in 4+ months they have to change them all
> AGAIN
> > to 2006? What's the point?
> >
> > The re-design is nice but the year thing???
> >
>
I think it's so they can have the link to the listen live page hidden from prying eyes, which is why it's now part of a macromedia image. No more right clicking or looking at the source HTML
> I think that's just so they can display the new designs with
> a hidden link before going live.
>
>
> > ok, so then in 4+ months they have to change them all
> AGAIN
> > to 2006? What's the point?
> >
> > The re-design is nice but the year thing???
> >
>
I think it's so they can have the link to the listen live page hidden from prying eyes, which is why it's now part of a macromedia image. No more right clicking or looking at the source HTML
O
OldiesCat
Guest
CC's new web
shows what I know- thanks for the 411.
>
>
> I think it's so they can have the link to the listen live
> page hidden from prying eyes, which is why it's now part of
> a macromedia image. No more right clicking or looking at the
> source HTML
>
shows what I know- thanks for the 411.
>
>
> I think it's so they can have the link to the listen live
> page hidden from prying eyes, which is why it's now part of
> a macromedia image. No more right clicking or looking at the
> source HTML
>
Re: CC's new web designs...
I don't get it. Why would they do that? Right now the link is javascript...
>
> I think it's so they can have the link to the listen live
> page hidden from prying eyes, which is why it's now part of
> a macromedia image. No more right clicking or looking at the
> source HTML
>
I don't get it. Why would they do that? Right now the link is javascript...
>
> I think it's so they can have the link to the listen live
> page hidden from prying eyes, which is why it's now part of
> a macromedia image. No more right clicking or looking at the
> source HTML
>
Re: CC's new web designs...
> I don't get it. Why would they do that? Right now the link
> is javascript...
>
Well, I do remember in a yahoo group about streaming radio, one of CC's VP's was mentioning that they eventually wanted to initiate a pay model where $4.95 a month would allow a high speed stream to either a specific brand of station (all the Kiss's or Mix's or whatever) or based on specific markets. Other than that, i can't remember anything else that was mentioned (search yahoo groups, the posts are still there)
What better way to implement the change? Get everyone hooked on the current streams then change it to pay only, and you'll get some upset, but many will jump on it if the price isn't too off the wall.
I figure the change to flash is so they can change to this system without people figuring out the new direct links, of course if they did everything in a secure system like some of the japanese pay stations I've seen they wouldn't have to worry about hiding urls as the links wouldn't open without being verifyed as payed anyway.
> I don't get it. Why would they do that? Right now the link
> is javascript...
>
Well, I do remember in a yahoo group about streaming radio, one of CC's VP's was mentioning that they eventually wanted to initiate a pay model where $4.95 a month would allow a high speed stream to either a specific brand of station (all the Kiss's or Mix's or whatever) or based on specific markets. Other than that, i can't remember anything else that was mentioned (search yahoo groups, the posts are still there)
What better way to implement the change? Get everyone hooked on the current streams then change it to pay only, and you'll get some upset, but many will jump on it if the price isn't too off the wall.
I figure the change to flash is so they can change to this system without people figuring out the new direct links, of course if they did everything in a secure system like some of the japanese pay stations I've seen they wouldn't have to worry about hiding urls as the links wouldn't open without being verifyed as payed anyway.
- Status