Dndsh237 said:
whatever people said:
okay smart people, then define classic rock.....but before you answer, are you under 40?....are you in radio?....have you ever worked in the music industry? if you say "yes" to any of those questions, radio stations could care less what you think....i'm just sayin
Ummmm....
How does the answer to any of those questions, determine what radio stations think?
But OK I'll bite...
1. I am close to 40
2. yes and have been since the mid 1980's
3. no
Please explain why those answers define what radio statitons think. I am extremely curious here.
I'll take a stab at it- odds are if you're under 40, you're not the CR target market. And if you work in radio, or the music industry, you probably don't accurately reflect the tastes of the 'average' listener.
For example, you, and Rover, and I may all be sick to death of Freebird, Stairway, Sweet Emotion, etc...Problem is the 'average' listener, who doesn't hear this stuff near as much as those of us in radio aren't necessrily sick to death of those songs.
The other problem with defining classic rock is that every single person is going to have their idea of what bands, artists or songs should be included. Take the stones- do you play the early (Satisfaction, JJFlash, Paint it Black) material, do you play the mid 70's (Exile, Goat's Head, Black and Blue) the late 70's early 80's (Some Girls LP, waiting on a friend, start me up, etc) or do you even go mid to late 80's to 90's (undercover of the night, bridges to Babylon, etc)...
Play "Mother's Little Helper" and you're playing a song that's almost FORTY FIVE years old. If you're trying to attract a 45-50 year old listener, playing a song almost older than them might not be the best bet. But okay, that 50 year old was he into music early, and knows the early 70's stuff, or did he bloom late musically, and you'd be better off with Some Girls and Tattoo you...
But you (as a programmer) have got to try and program a format that is going to appeal to the MOST people.