• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

'CKG on backup transmitter/the future of 'CKG?

E

eggsdannythomas

Guest
WCKG was on their backup transmitter today because they were installing the digital one. Which prompts me to a few observations and questions:

1) They only stream the local shows from 10:00AM to 9:00PM, would it be wise for them to replay those shows at night on their sub-channels?

2) The imaging is sounding better, by that I mean they got rid of the woman doing the id's. She sounded like she swallowed a carton of Pall Mall's. But will they continue with that lame "The Great One"? How about "1059 WCKG", keep it simple?

3) I really enjoy John & Jeff, IMO they are the best night-time talk show around (when Nick Digillio isn't on). O'Reilly isn't too bad on the radio (he should have gotten Kev's slot immediately) and Adam Corrolla is always great (too bad we probably won't get his morning show here).

How much will these syndicated shows play into the upcoming "new 'CKG" or "Howardless 'CKG"?

4) Mornings? Local/National? Naughty(Mancow)/Nice(Bob & Marianne)?

5) Subchannel? Newsradio 78 or THE SCORE? Good choice for downtown folks who are AM challenged? Music? Maybe do a harder edge Jack, more Rockin'. How about financial programs during the day? Maybe Bloomberg Radio or CBS Marketwatch.

OKAY, WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK? Let's face it, the happenings at 'CKG are gonna keep us busy until the next few months. They were THIS CLOSE to flipping to JACK, considering Stever was the only asset they had at the time. But they were spared because Big Joel pannicked and JACKED 2 stations whose listenership was starting to grow old.

With that being said, they are experiencing a reneisance, Stan & Terry are really good, Pete's got that nice guy thing down pretty well and the nighttime syndicated shows are good (Phil Hendrie would be a better fit than O'Reilly, he should be on WIND or WLS, but at least he's on in Chicago).

They are in the catbird seat, with the new studios and the knowledge that there is life after Stern, are they using this time to their advantage so they can finally give us a Hot Talker worthy of Chicago.
 
> WCKG was on their backup transmitter today because they were
> installing the digital one. Which prompts me to a few
> observations and questions:
>
> 1) They only stream the local shows from 10:00AM to 9:00PM,
> would it be wise for them to replay those shows at night on
> their sub-channels?
>
> 2) The imaging is sounding better, by that I mean they got
> rid of the woman doing the id's. She sounded like she
> swallowed a carton of Pall Mall's. But will they continue
> with that lame "The Great One"? How about "1059 WCKG", keep
> it simple?
>
> 3) I really enjoy John & Jeff, IMO they are the best
> night-time talk show around (when Nick Digillio isn't on).
> O'Reilly isn't too bad on the radio (he should have gotten
> Kev's slot immediately) and Adam Corrolla is always great
> (too bad we probably won't get his morning show here).
>
> How much will these syndicated shows play into the upcoming
> "new 'CKG" or "Howardless 'CKG"?
>
> 4) Mornings? Local/National?
> Naughty(Mancow)/Nice(Bob & Marianne)?
>
> 5) Subchannel? Newsradio 78 or THE SCORE? Good choice
> for downtown folks who are AM challenged? Music? Maybe do
> a harder edge Jack, more Rockin'. How about financial
> programs during the day? Maybe Bloomberg Radio or CBS
> Marketwatch.
>
> OKAY, WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK? Let's face it, the happenings
> at 'CKG are gonna keep us busy until the next few months.
> They were THIS CLOSE to flipping to JACK, considering Stever
> was the only asset they had at the time. But they were
> spared because Big Joel pannicked and JACKED 2 stations
> whose listenership was starting to grow old.
>
> With that being said, they are experiencing a reneisance,
> Stan & Terry are really good, Pete's got that nice guy thing
> down pretty well and the nighttime syndicated shows are good
> (Phil Hendrie would be a better fit than O'Reilly, he should
> be on WIND or WLS, but at least he's on in Chicago).
>
> They are in the catbird seat, with the new studios and the
> knowledge that there is life after Stern, are they using
> this time to their advantage so they can finally give us a
> Hot Talker worthy of Chicago.

As long as I have to pay more for an IBOC receiver than a digital TV receiver, I'll be "analoging it" on AM and FM...
 
>
> As long as I have to pay more for an IBOC receiver than a
> digital TV receiver, I'll be "analoging it" on AM and FM...


EXACTLY!!!!!
and as long as those new fangled color tv's cost more than the black and white ones, i'm sticking with my trusty DuMont monochrome! We'll show em!!
>
 
> >
> > As long as I have to pay more for an IBOC receiver than a
> > digital TV receiver, I'll be "analoging it" on AM and
> FM...
>
>
> EXACTLY!!!!!
> and as long as those new fangled color tv's cost more than
> the black and white ones, i'm sticking with my trusty DuMont
> monochrome! We'll show em!!
> >
>

And a lot of people did until the price on them dropped and common person could own them. Same thing with SatelliteTV & Radio, Cable, Computers etc..........

His point is, the technology costs way too much for the common folk to buy right now.

Also why buy equipment, where you have to mortgage the house to get it, and is in its early stages, will have more bells and whistles down when you do not have to mortgage the house?<P ID="signature">______________

"Z"
Music Coordinator/Technical Support</P>
 
> >
> > As long as I have to pay more for an IBOC receiver than a
> > digital TV receiver, I'll be "analoging it" on AM and
> FM...
>
>
> EXACTLY!!!!!
> and as long as those new fangled color tv's cost more than
> the black and white ones, i'm sticking with my trusty DuMont
> monochrome! We'll show em!!
> >

I didn't say, "As long as an HD Radio costs more than a cheapo AM/FM radio." If I did, then your analogy would actually make sense.

I was making a technology vs. cost comparison. A DTV box that delivers audio at bitrates of 384kbps or even 512kbps, not to mention *video*, costs more than a IBOC receiver that delivers half the audio bitrate, at best, from any station? I'll wait for the price to drop to a more reasonable level before I jump into this technology that, from the most optimistic postings about its performance, may hardly work at all where I live.
 
DOn't laugh too loud..my late grandmother kept her late 60s model B&W until it finally gave up the ghost in the early 80s..I finally bought her a color set though if a console B&W had been available, she have preferred that.<P ID="signature">______________
Did the Corinthians ever write back?</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom