I don't really understand why WMJI and WHLK are basically playing the same music.
There's more to a radio station than just music.
I don't really understand why WMJI and WHLK are basically playing the same music.
One brands themselves as Majic 105.7 and the other 106.5 The Lake. The other difference is that The Lake has no DJs or hosts. Other than that, ~75% of the music shared between the two is the same. Same commercials as well and almost technically the same format too.There's more to a radio station than just music.
One brands themselves as Majic 105.7 and the other 106.5 The Lake. The other difference is that The Lake has no DJs or hosts. Other than that, ~75% of the music shared between the two is the same. Same commercials as well and almost technically the same format too.
I'm not sure why Cleveland still continues to lack a soft AC format
But aren't the media giants selling advertising for all stations in their cluster, not individual stations?Simple: They can't sell it to advertisers. But they can sell The Lake and Majic.
But aren't the media giants selling advertising for all stations in their cluster, not individual stations?
That used to be on WGAR 99.5 HD2 a several years ago. Probably pulled the plug as so few listeners listen to or have access to a HD Radio. Same with Real Oldies on WMJI HD2. That was good back in the early 2010s, but they eventually tuned the format to more of a mainstream format instead of the dance/pop format that it originally was, and I think it's now focused on songs from the 60s and 70s, rather than just mainly 60s.The Breeze is a great streaming format. You can find it on iHeart radio. It's not useful as a broadcast format. At least not in Cleveland.
Throw out the classic rock songs on WMJI and they would essentially be soft AC.Simple: They can't sell it to advertisers. But they can sell The Lake and Majic.
Radio would be very different if listeners paid for it instead of advertisers.
Throw out the classic rock songs on WMJI and they would essentially be soft AC.
And the musical difference between classic rock and classic hits [or oldies] is that they are basically the same anymore. I would say between them there seems to be almost a 75-80% overlap. In the past I've tuned in to WNCX & WQMX and have literally just heard a song that I had heard on WHLK or WMJI minutes prior to me stabbing the station buttons while scanning the dial. I can remember stations staying in their lanes decades ago and it's "Nope, ain't playing that song, it's too country, too classic, too much rock, too much "something" else and doesn't fit our format so we ain't so not playing it." Now, if it's close they'll play it.The reason those classic rock songs are there is to prevent that from happening.
IMO, music radio is reflecting more how most people are getting their music today and that's from internet sources like ITunes, Spotify and even the corporate radio streaming sites, and not OTA radio.
So how are they listening - on a phone or computer? The sound quality can't possibly be as good as on my home stereo receiver.IMO, music radio is reflecting more how most people are getting their music today and that's from internet sources like ITunes, Spotify and even the corporate radio streaming sites, and not OTA radio.
And this is where I'd say that internet streaming has gone way too far. Back in the early 2000s, the only competitor to traditional AM/FM broadcasting was Sirius and XM satellite radio. Yes, some radio stations did have an online stream, but they were not hubbed into a platform, and was during a time when most people were tethered to a cable for internet access with no smart phones and such.IMO, music radio is reflecting more how most people are getting their music today and that's from internet sources like ITunes, Spotify and even the corporate radio streaming sites, and not OTA radio.
So how are they listening - on a phone or computer? The sound quality can't possibly be as good as on my home stereo receiver.
Of course, if radio stations had a much broader playlist instead of playing the same 40 songs day in and day out, perhaps more people would be tuning in.
Alot of streaming stations have apps available you can download on your smart TV so you can listen through your home entertainment system or surround sound systemSo how are they listening - on a phone or computer? The sound quality can't possibly be as good as on my home stereo receiver
I've said it before but just before XM went "on-air" so to speak I was offered a spot on one of the Decades Channels. MY first thought was "PAY radio? Who's going to fall for that? I can turn on my AM/FM radio and hear music for free. This will be dead in two years. AND there's no way in hell I want to move to Washington D.C." Now it's "Boy, what an idiot I was. Wish I could turn my feet around and kick myself in the ass." So streaming may end up with some over-the-air listeners but not all. I find it's still pretty unreliable as it'll buffer, cut out mid stream requiring to reboot/refresh my browser or app. As far as XM goes, I should have thought about what one of my high school teachers was offered when WWII ended. One of his buddies said he was starting up a company to build computer machines that could do math and other calculations faster than any human could ever do and offered him to go in as part owner if he chipped in a chunk of change. My teach at the time thought it was a pie in the sky idea and it would never happen so turned him down. That company today is known as IBM.And this is where I'd say that internet streaming has gone way too far. Back in the early 2000s, the only competitor to traditional AM/FM broadcasting was Sirius and XM satellite radio.
What streams or app are you using? How fast is your internet? I use the Radio Garden app and have never had a station buffer at all, and I listen to station streams from all around the world on it.I find it's still pretty unreliable as it'll buffer, cut out mid stream requiring to reboot/refresh my browser or app.