formeraa said:
2. We can nitpik over a few years, but I definitely remember KING 5 News at 5pm in the late 70's.
I noted it as parenthetical trivia in my previous comment -- I'm one of those folks who enjoy the old TV listings over in the "classic TV" board here.
But I just grabbed an old Seattle PI TV listing from October 1980, and here's what was on each of the commercial stations for early evening news at that time -- KOMO/4 and KIRO/7 started their evening news at 5 PM, and KING/5 was still starting at 5:30 ("Carol Burnett" ran at 5:00 PM). KSTW/11 had an hour at 10 PM, and the soon-to-relaunch KCPQ/13 had no news until later in the decade. KOMO/4 was apparently the first station in Seattle to run 90 minutes of early evening local news, while KING/5 and KIRO/7 were each doing an hour.
While it's sort of off-topic for this thread, it isn't entirely so. As folks comment on cutbacks of local news at various stations across the country, it's worth remembering that many of these markets still have many more hours of local news than was the case in the past. Additional stations have added newscasts that didn't used to run any news, while stations that have long had a news presence have added hours and hours of additional local news over the course of their broadcast weeks.
It's more than possible that many of these stations went overboard -- is there really enough going on in many medium sized markets to justify the hours of news currently spread across four or five different stations? Especially when we only have to reach back to the mid-nineties to see that many of these same markets had only two stations (or three at most) that originated local news, and those stations typically carried just a couple hours a day (a half hour at noon, an hour in the early evening, and another half hour after prime time).
So some of what the economy is now forcing in news cutbacks really may just be a reasonable market correction.