From time to time I am approached by stations that want me to work for them, but although they say they are looking for a contract engineer what they really want is a fireman. They want someone they can call when something is on fire, and after the flames are out they don't want to see or pay that person again until something else is on fire. I have recently been approached by some station clusters under a few different owners who are looking for an engineer because the engineer that all of them used died a few months ago. They all apparently want a fireman.
In my mind that is not contract engineering, because there is nothing to contract about. A contract engineer contracts, for a monthly retainer covering a predetermined maximum number of monthly hours, to undertake predefined maintenance of the station physical plant and to be on call for emergencies. A fireman is not a contract engineer because he is not under contract to provide maintenance.
Stations say that they cannot afford a retainer. That seems shortsighted to me - they cannot afford to pay someone to keep them on the air, but they can afford to be off the air and losing money, sometimes for days, while they are trying to find a fireman to put out their conflagration.
I have been in radio engineering for 40+ years, and serving as a salaried chief engineer, or as a contract engineer, for radio stations (and one small TV station) has been the major (and usually the only) source of my income for 30+ years. I am too old to be a fireman, and have no desire to work on a physical plant which receives no maintenance.
What say you?
In my mind that is not contract engineering, because there is nothing to contract about. A contract engineer contracts, for a monthly retainer covering a predetermined maximum number of monthly hours, to undertake predefined maintenance of the station physical plant and to be on call for emergencies. A fireman is not a contract engineer because he is not under contract to provide maintenance.
Stations say that they cannot afford a retainer. That seems shortsighted to me - they cannot afford to pay someone to keep them on the air, but they can afford to be off the air and losing money, sometimes for days, while they are trying to find a fireman to put out their conflagration.
I have been in radio engineering for 40+ years, and serving as a salaried chief engineer, or as a contract engineer, for radio stations (and one small TV station) has been the major (and usually the only) source of my income for 30+ years. I am too old to be a fireman, and have no desire to work on a physical plant which receives no maintenance.
What say you?