R
Radioman100
Guest
DavidEduardo said:Radioman100 said:The 2000 census puts the Hispanic population at just over 41%.
But Arbitron uses 2006 data from Claritas, which processes Census updates and other data to get a more "real" view of the 12+ population. And they indicate that the current 12+ of the MSA (two counties, with Odessa and Midland in them) is 34% for 2006. For 2007, it is 38%, but only 41% are Spanish dominant, one of the lowest in the state. There is no DST, no language proportionality, etc. There are only 165 Spanish dominant diaries in the Spring book, meaning that for, let's say, 18-34 in Morning drive, there are about 50 Spanish dominant diaries. So each diary can change a station share by around 2% each.
I assure you, the real number including illegals who aren't likely to submit to the census is much higher. Possibly as high as 60% in Odessa. Midland is officially just under 29% Hispanic, but I assure you the real number is higher there as well.
The Claritas numbers use by Arbitron come very close to reality, as they contemplate things like vehicle registrations and other data that they combine with the Census projections. And, most demographers agree, the Census was within a few percent of accurately counting illegals, too. Remeber, there was an extensive campaign on Spanish langauge media indicating that the Census data was not shared and that the Census staff would not ask about legal status. Perfect? No. But very close? Yes. And Claritas gives even closer figures.
The Hispanic population of Amarillo is just over 21%.
... less than half of which is Spanish dominant. Horrible market for Spanish langauge stations. The whole market has less than $10 million in revenue, no revenue growth, and 19 stations in the MSA.
Well, Claritas is just plain wrong about Midland & Odessa. The Hispanic population is a lot higher than a third, especially in Odessa.