• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Discovery, Warner Media merger in the works.

The deeper they get in the media business, the worse their stock performs.

The last time they bought a media company, the government sued for anti-trust. What makes them think it won't happen again?
 
Still, Democrats are traditionally less open to media consolidation. That's what this is.

Splitting Warner-Discovery off is still more consolidation.
BUT, if they can make a convincing argument that this merger is necessary to make them more competitive against Netflix and Disney as the article from CNBC states, that may help bolster their anti-trust defense.
 
BUT, if they can make a convincing argument that this merger is necessary to make them more competitive against Netflix and Disney as the article from CNBC states, that may help bolster their anti-trust defense.

It's hard to imagine anyone having sympathy for that view when you have both parties looking to break up "big tech."

The fact is AT&T made a bunch of promises when they bought Warner Media. This will put those promises on display, at a time when consumers want content for free.
 
AT&T shouldn't have gotten Time Warner the DOJ shouldn't have approved the deal a few years ago along with Direct TV in 2015. Since AT&T is an evil empire.
 
The last sentence in that linked article might be an even bigger shakeup:

"Now sources believe NBCU will turn its sights on ViacomCBS."

Imagine that for a minute.
 
Hollywood Reporter has a very different take on all this. They say at one point, AT&T was looking to spin Warner to NBCUniversal, but Comcast didn't move quick enough.


Now that Discovery is involved, Hollywood Reporter offers this:

"Now sources believe NBCU will turn its sights on ViacomCBS."

Imagine that for a minute.
 
I don't think regulators will like the Warner-Discovery deal either.

Democrats hate media consolidation. But who knows?
Comcast won’t be able to own both NBC and CBS. I don’t know if they will allow Discovery to own Warner either, but Comcast would be the bigger concern.
 
It's official, and the big news is that Discovery's David Zaslav will run the combined operation:


I believe this is good news for the Warner Media folks, because Zaslav has done a much better job with Discovery than AT&T has done with Warner. The bad news is it really doesn't help Warner in the streaming wars. Discovery is the big beneficiary there. Nobody was interested in Discovery+.
 
It's official, and the big news is that Discovery's David Zaslav will run the combined operation:


I believe this is good news for the Warner Media folks, because Zaslav has done a much better job with Discovery than AT&T has done with Warner. The bad news is it really doesn't help Warner in the streaming wars. Discovery is the big beneficiary there. Nobody was interested in Discovery+.
So does Discovery+ become a part of HBO Max or are they separate.
 
this might be bad news for AEW as they have a TV network on TNT, one of the networks owned by one half of the soon to be merging mega-content maker, as with WCW (which was owned by Turner when it merged into TimeWarner) they were completely impacted hard by the failed AOLTimeWarner merger of the early 2000s, as with that merger, WCW had become so much of a money pit and having TV Ratings and legal issues (they were sued by talent who were also minority i.e. Asian, Hispanic and Black talent for racism) as well as the huge contract of talent who defected from WWE (then WWF) to WCW for a bigger payday after WCW signed Hulk Hogan in 1994, which triggered the start of WCW's rise and later contributed to it's downfall, AOLTimeWarner wanted out of the wrestling business and planned on selling it in late 2000/early 2001, but the actual death came at the hands of one executive hired to oversee TNT & TBS, he decided to canceled WCW cause TV ratings were bad and he felt that wrestling was no longer a fit on "his networks" so therefore, it killed a plan of a group of investors including Eric Bischoff to buy WCW out, as the thing that killed the buyout was no TV, and it lead to WWE buying the company out and thus putting it out of business (there were plans to have WCW continue as a separate brand of WWE but Viacom executives running TNN (now Paramount Network) didn't like that and thus was canceled and in it's place was a failed "Invasion angle" on WWE TV in 2001 and a actual brand extension that was originally planned for WCW end up happening but instead of "WWE" and "WCW" as brands, it became "Raw" and "SmackDown" as brands. the AOLTimeWarner merger was the bust of the late 90s/early 2000s wrestling bubble, as wrestling never recovered from it's late 90s/early 2000s highs.

so for AEW, they better hope they have the same people overseeing TNT now to stay post-merger to keep them on TNT, if not, they need to look at the possibility of moving to another network.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom