• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Emmis flips Austin translator to all comedy

As I mentioned, Sirius-XM offers a number of niche comedy channels. The channels also also feature daily long-form comedy programs produced exclusively for Sirius-XM. You are getting something that is not available free. I've heard Emmis plans to insert local comedy into their network feed. That would be something satellite can't do.

Sound quality? It tends to vary from channel to channel on satellite. I suppose some get more bandwidth than others. But I find it comparable to terrestrial FM on my Sirius setup.
 
There is a history at Emmis with comedy, at least if you look at KLBJ-FM. Their morning show currently has a local comedian as part of its lineup and they used to have one in their midday slot. The station is also tied pretty heavily to Cap City Comedy club. Many of their events are done there and the touring comedians will spend most of their local promotion time on KLBJ. So, the minds are there to do it right, but will they do it?
 
This was a good move. It was pointless to have KGSR on the 102-7 translator. 93-3 signal beats 102-7 anywhere.

I'm not saying I want MegaHD2 on 102-7, because I want MegaHD2 to continue to be commercial-free. I can pick up 103-5HD2 from Salado to Schertz. Keep it going, Emmis!
 
IMHO Comedy 102.7 is much better than the Sirius XM Offerings. I spent some time with satellite last weekend it it seems to me the quaility of their programming has gone down quite a bit.
 
The quality of XM went down when they merged with Sirius. Programing and sound.
 
i dont think so. i am little north of lockhart and i get kgsr about 14-16% on ssi on my hd radio and the hd signal is around 55 - 58 db
 
Pete, we are not quite there yet on KBPA. We have a project slated for the new year which should make a significant power improvement to our HD signal. It will also bring the HD signal off our aux antenna and combine it with the main signal on the master antenna improving our coverage even more.
 
Krash Kelly said:
Pete, we are not quite there yet on KBPA. We have a project slated for the new year which should make a significant power improvement to our HD signal. It will also bring the HD signal off our aux antenna and combine it with the main signal on the master antenna improving our coverage even more.

So is KBPAHD2 at five percent power? I heard you guys were doing 10 percent. Bad source.

ETA: I can pick up KBPAHD2 all the way to Schertz on the HD Radio in my car. Once the upgrade occurs, any chance of penetrating North San Antonio the way KBPAHD1 does currently?
 
Pete, as I understand it, a legacy HD Radio transmitter can't be upgraded to 5% or 10% power on a maximum power class C station. The way it was explained to me was that those original HD Radio transmitters were never built with the idea that anyone would be able to transmit more than 1,000 watts and simply aren't capable of transmitting at higher power levels. So, if you're trying to upgrade a 100,000 watt station's HD signal, you need to buy a brand new transmitter. I'm sure if my source on this was wrong, someone will tell me, but that's the way I heard it. It's also possible that KBPA has a newer HD transmitter, but I kinda doubt it if it's been at the auxiliary site.
 
Pete Pyeatt said:
ETA: I can pick up KBPAHD2 all the way to Schertz on the HD Radio in my car. Once the upgrade occurs, any chance of penetrating North San Antonio the way KBPAHD1 does currently?

I think there is only 1 IBOC data stream. The RF mask does not change for multiple HD's. The radio receiver picks off different data from the stream for HD1, HD2, etc. That's a software thing.
There may be a difference in quality (BPS), but the RF strength is the same for both.

Like Kent says, someone will be sure to tell me if I am wrong.
 
Iused2nothat said:
I think there is only 1 IBOC data stream. The RF mask does not change for multiple HD's. The radio receiver picks off different data from the stream for HD1, HD2, etc. That's a software thing.
There may be a difference in quality (BPS), but the RF strength is the same for both.

Like Kent says, someone will be sure to tell me if I am wrong.

I wish I had a "Like" button for that post! :)

That's my understanding of how HD Radio works, too. I suspect he was either simply referring to the analog signal as "HD-1" to point out the analog signal gets out further or he was listening to the HD stream only to not notice it had already dropped back to analog by the time he got to San Antonio. I can't really perceive much of a difference between HD streams and analog, and I suspect most other people can't either. Unless I'm riding around town with a friend who has an HD receiver in his car, I listen on one of those dongles for the iPhone, and I've noticed the software tends to run behind. So, you'll show HD after it's already dropped out or it will show that it's still searching for the HD signal after it's already locked on. I find it funny that I can receive the HD-2 signal before the software indicates it's even locked onto HD!
 
Kent said:
I suspect he was either simply referring to the analog signal as "HD-1" to point out the analog signal gets out further or he was listening to the HD stream only to not notice it had already dropped back to analog by the time he got to San Antonio.

It drops back to analog after a certain distance? I have so much to learn!

Also, why does the HD2 go silent when I get outside the listening range of an HD Radio station? Why don't I hear static on an HD2?

When I'm listening to KBPAHD2, when I get south of New Braunfels, the station will go silent, then go back to programming, then back and forth from silent to programming until my radio puts up the message "HD2 Off." Why don't I hear static like on an analog station?

ETA: I forgot to ask, what is a "legacy" HD Radio transmitter and why can't it be upgraded to 5 or 10 percent on a maximum power Class C station?
 
On a seomwhat related note-- Are there any news and public service requirements for these FM translators? I haven't heard as much as a PSA on the comedy network.
 
Kent, you are 100% correct. The current HD transmitter is a ‘legacy’ unit, so to borrow a line from Star Trek, ‘She’s giving us all she’s got’. I think we are pushing about 2-2.5% at the moment.

And Pete, I am not sure how much the upgrade will help your situation in Bexar county. Our antenna is mounted on the north side of the tower so to provide as much signal towards Austin. While I’m sure the upgrade will help you, it might be more pronounced from San Marcos, north.
 
Pete Pyeatt said:
It drops back to analog after a certain distance? I have so much to learn!

Yes. Once your radio's software can no longer decode the HD signal, it will drop to the analog signal if one is available.

Also, why does the HD2 go silent when I get outside the listening range of an HD Radio station? Why don't I hear static on an HD2?

An HD2 will go silent because your radio has nothing to fall back on after you get out of its range. That's also part of why you don't hear static on an HD2. HD Radio is digital; you either get the signal or you don't. When you get it, it's clear. When you can't get a strong enough signal to decode, you get complete silence. It's not unlike what happens with digital TV. Snowy pictures are a thing of the past now. Some people who used to put up with a snowy signal get a completely clear picture while others get absolutely nothing.

When I'm listening to KBPAHD2, when I get south of New Braunfels, the station will go silent, then go back to programming, then back and forth from silent to programming until my radio puts up the message "HD2 Off." Why don't I hear static like on an analog station?

See above. When you get out of range of the HD signal, it's gone. This is referred to as the "cliff effect." It's perfect until you're out of range, and, then, poof, it disappears. When you're listening to an HD1, you won't notice it as much because you'll automatically get the analog signal after you can no longer decode the digital signal. When you listen to 103.5 HD2 and it's going back and forth from silent to programming, you're getting digital's version of "picket fencing." The signal is getting weaker, but you can still decode it in some parts better than others. Much like with analog signals, a variety of factors can affect digital listening. The digital signals, however, show a more pronounced difference because it's all or nothing.

ETA: I forgot to ask, what is a "legacy" HD Radio transmitter and why can't it be upgraded to 5 or 10 percent on a maximum power Class C station?

A legacy HD Radio transmitter is an older HD Radio transmitter built before the FCC allowed the increase in power and before the technology evolved to allow even more HD streams. As for why it can't be upgraded beyond roughly 1,000 watts, it was simply designed that way, probably for many different reasons. The following are just my theories:

You build according to what you need today. You'll never see a 1,000,000 watt FM transmitter because there's simply no need to build a higher cost transmitter that no one can use. No one knew the FCC would decide HD Radio would be allowed to operate above 1% power. So, there was no need to build a stronger HD Radio transmitter. In fact, there was probably a lot of incentive not to build one because of how many stations run unattended. Simply put, you can get away with less transmitter monitoring if the transmitter can't exceed your station's maximum power!

Also, keep in mind that HD Radio was initially an experimental system. Again, no one is going to spend a ton on a transmitter they might not be able to use for more than a few years. This meant transmitter manufacturers would build those transmitters as cheaply as possible, too. The cheaper the equipment, the less you can do with it. There was no incentive at all to invest a bunch of money into an HD Radio transmitter when broadcasters didn't want to spend much money on it.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom