> > > The Queen is a ceremonial part of Canada's
> > membership in the Commonwealth of Nations and is a
> > figurehead. Nothing more.
>
> Does she any enjoy that status any more or less in the
> Motherland? Also, if the US were to (re)join the
> Commonwealth, we'd be stuck with the Crown again, right?
>
Nope, it's too late. We were never in the Commonweath, as it did not exist in 1776. It came much later - as part of the gentle breakup of the British Empire. Being a republic, there is no place in our constitution for a figurehead monarch. Australia is considering doing the same - by the way.
> >Canada has its own laws,
> > military (such as it is), money and territorial claims.
> > These are as independent from the UK as ours are.
>
> I think I knew that
> >
> > Puerto Rico, on the other hand IS part of the territory of
>
> > the USA. If you enter PR from another country, as I have
> on
> > many occasions, you deal with the same brand of 'smiling'
> > customs officers from the ICE as you would in Miami,
> Boston
> > or Atlanta. Our Federal laws apply on the island too.
> And,
> > Puerto Ricans are US citizens, free to move to Florida,
> New
> > York or Connecticut and back whenever they want.
>
> But not the states I've lived in (Pennsylvania, New Jersey
> and Maryland) or the state I work in (Delaware), right?
Just using examples based on experience. I will happily add New Yersey, MD, PA and DE to the list of places where Puerto Ricans can move without hassle - and toss in Hawaii for good measure! :-D
Seriously, their experience is 100% different than that of Mexicans, Dominicans or other Latin Americans who need visas and green cards.
>
> > So, your analogy was incorrect.
>
> No sh*t. Don't rub it in.
>
> ixnay
>