• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Fault Radio

A story in SFGate today underscores the blurred (vanished?) lines between radio the medium and radio as a noun for audio:


It calls itself "Fault Radio", but it does not broadcast over the air. And SFGate is not the first to cover Fault Radio without even mentioning the fact that you don't listen to it...on the radio. KQED did the same in a story three years ago:

 
A story in SFGate today underscores the blurred (vanished?) lines between radio the medium and radio as a noun for audio:

They even have live & local DJs! This goes back to some advice I gave to owners of LPFMs. I told them to combine their radio stations with a restaurant so they've have a secondary income stream. Plus they'd have a theme for a restaurant and something for customers to see besides the food.

The use of DJs as live entertainment blurred the line between the role on the radio and what they did at weddings or events. It made the radio job less exclusive and less attractive. Then the event DJ became a bigger personality than the radio DJ ever was. Now you have event DJs playing stadiums. It makes the role on the radio much less appealing.
 
They even have live & local DJs! This goes back to some advice I gave to owners of LPFMs. I told them to combine their radio stations with a restaurant so they've have a secondary income stream. Plus they'd have a theme for a restaurant and something for customers to see besides the food.

The use of DJs as live entertainment blurred the line between the role on the radio and what they did at weddings or events. It made the radio job less exclusive and less attractive. Then the event DJ became a bigger personality than the radio DJ ever was. Now you have event DJs playing stadiums. It makes the role on the radio much less appealing.
But once you've watched someone on the air, the novelty wears off fast. Also you may end up dealing with drunk people trying to get into the studio when no one's on the air. I was in the restaurant when this happened at 810 Zone, which is a restaurant that's partnered with WHB.
 
A story in SFGate today underscores the blurred (vanished?) lines between radio the medium and radio as a noun for audio

This is why I have been so critical of Audacy's rejection of the radio.com domain. They have ignored the best possible domain brand in the business, failing to understand that "radio" is a universal term for streaming audio that remains current, relevant and modern. It's a word that is understood -- and spelled the same way -- across many if not most languages. And yet I still hear Audacy radio stations having to spell out their app name in their promos instead -- "That's A-U-D-A-C-Y." It's a confusing homonym for Odyssey that faces needless, self-inflicted headwinds.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom