I said those were poor choices for rock on May 14, 2006--and in the immediately following day(s), you took not one but TWO opportunities to entirely re-post my statement without the benefit of a quote function.
The first re-posting you added "How do you figure that? They play the same songs over and over again. Tell me what should have been in the list?" in the middle of my reproduced post, without so much as a functioned set off or other marking material depicting it as your own words and not mine.
It wasn't until the second re-posting that you added the enormously elegant, productive, debate-enhancing, and assumedly correct/conclusory "Oh yea whatever".
Point is, your questions and discussion have been asked and answered. You don't like and cannot live with the fact that someone may possibly dislike K-Rock. So, you want to stir the pot again.
I already answered you--and you had TWO opportunities to respond back to me and do 4 months ago. I have nothing to add; but apparently you do, and you again have fashioned more conclusory statements, to wit: "And it wasn't"
By the way, my statement from May on proofreading still stands.
Now, isn't the bell about to ring for study hall to end? Let the grown-ups talk (to quote James Woods in "Casino").