• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

FCC Commissioner Calls To Ban TikTok

People would be a hell of a lot smarter if this app weren’t around anymore.
What? Thanks to TikTok, many teens now know how tasty Tide Pods really are and that chicken tastes great when it's cooked in NyQuil. LOL.
 
Yes.. regardless of which side you are on, I think we can all agree that the MyPillow guy is a billowing turdbiscuit.
 



Also it's crazy how Tik Tok was initially accused of spreading questionable content over Ivermectin until it revealed that politicians and Pundits were doing that for political gain and some of it came from Fox News once the investigation fact checked those claims about trending on Tik Tok.
 
Also it's crazy how Tik Tok was initially accused of spreading questionable content over Ivermectin until it revealed that politicians and Pundits were doing that for political gain and some of it came from Fox News once the investigation fact checked those claims about trending on Tik Tok.

TikTok guidelines only prohibit misinformation if it causes harm. Ivermectin doesn't help, but it doesn't hurt either.


So while conservatives are free to talk about fake cures, they don't like TikTok because it's owned by a company in China. Of course their phone, computer, and TV were all made in China. But that's OK.
 
First, members of congress should sever their own connections with foreign adversaries, including the group of Republican senators who met with senior Russian officials in Moscow on July 4th in 2018:
Members of Congress meet with "foreign officials" constantly and with great expense to our government in what is broadly labeled as "fact finding missions" but which are often plain old junkets.

A common one is "to evaluate the status of Puerto Rico". there, the local press would frequently run stories on how what Democrats reported when back in DC was very different from what Republicans saw on the same tour.

My favorite, though, was when a House group visited Ecuador when the first oil pipeline was being opened across the Andes. A group of us in the news media who met after any local event got international coverage (mostly as an excuse to have ceviche and beer) found that the two parties could have been telling stories about two different countries! The facts were not wrong, it was just that the perspective and focus were totally different.
 

Umm how will that be enforced in practice. Also what disinformation issue has to be big enough to get people out of Tik Tok? Does it have to be as big as the Cambridge Analytica Scandal Meta Inc was accused of being in. Does it have to be conspiracy theories on Twitter? Alex Jones rantings on Youtube to get people to really boycott Tik Tok? Privacy issues everywhere?

State of play: TikTok is currently in negotiations with CFIUS, an interagency committee that conducts national security reviews of foreign companies' deals, to determine whether it can be divested by Chinese parent company ByteDance to an American company and remain operational in the United States.

  • The New York Times reported in September that a deal was taking shape but not yet in its final form and that Department of Justice official Lisa Monaco was concerned the deal did not provide sufficient insulation from Beijing.
  • A Republican-controlled Congress could try to scrap any deal viewed as too easy on China.
What he's saying: "I don’t believe there is a path forward for anything other than a ban," Carr said, citing recent revelations about how TikTok and ByteDance handle U.S. user data.

  • Carr highlighted concerns about U.S. data flowing back to China and the risk of a state actor using TikTok to covertly influence political processes in the United States.
  • There simply isn't "a world in which you could come up with sufficient protection on the data that you could have sufficient confidence that it’s not finding its way back into the hands of the [Chinese Communist Party]," Carr said.
 

Tik Tok, Twitter and Meta have all been accused for their failures in handling of election conspiracy theories not just in the USA but in Kenya, Philippines, and Brazil. Yes its a systemic issue for now on the platforms but then again how all platforms make reforms is yet to be seen again.



 



Note these bans only affect State owned devices.
 
GOP senators have come up with legislation to ban Tik Tok:


The new bill by Sen. Marco Rubio, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a bipartisan pair of congressmen in the House, reflects the latest escalation by US policymakers against the Chinese-owned short-form video app. TikTok has faced doubts about its ability to safeguard US user data from the Chinese government.

Aren't these the same people who claimed Twitter was censoring free speech?

They need to read the first amendment again. The first words are "Congress shall make no law." There are no exceptions.
 
It appears that a TikTok ban for government-owned devices will pass the congress:


The issue is moving in Congress after major security concerns were raised by both Democrat and Republican lawmakers and Biden administration officials. FBI Director Christopher Wray warned this month that Chinese officials have broad access to TikTok, which allows them "to manipulate content, and if they want to, to use it for influence operations."

However, Tik Tok will still be available for public consumer devices.
 
I really, really want to know what's up with that. Probably never will.
Senators and members of the House frequently do "fact finding" trips to visit both allies and adversaries. That has been the custom for longer than I have been alive.

I consider a lot of those trips to be junkets... free vacations paid for by taxpayers... but many are crucial to the needed understanding of world affairs by specific committee members dealing with trade, treaties, cultural exchanges, immigratioi and other areas.

When I lived and owned stations in Ecuador huge petroleum deposits had been discovered there. Quite a few legislators from the US visited to "understand" how that would effect world oil supplies and prices. Few of those legislators actually visited the oil fields in the jungle or the pipeline through the Andes. But they "did" all the fine restaurants and clubs in Quito for sure! Several asked to meet with me as an ex-pat in media, but I always refused as that would have caused me huge local damage to reputation and revenue.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom