GreedMongers said:However, if Martin takes Chairman Dingell's suggestion, Satrad receivers would be open for inclusion of "other technologies", as determined by marketplace forces. Struble may regret such a request, as this would open up competition with iPods and the Internet on Satrad receivers. There are approximately 100,000,000+ iPods, and sales continue to grow. The difference in cost of adding an iPod jack to Satrad receivers, versus the technical difficulties and cost of adding HD, would be considerable (Satrad hasn't even been able to create a practical interoperable receiver). Plus, iBiquity demands licensing and HD chipset fees.
...which only proves that both Struble and Dingell are technical morons. I'd love to see how they propose to make a radio that will tune any and all radio frequencies, from AM all the way up to satellite and WiFi, and make it affordable and small enough for consumers to want it. The licensing and chipset fees you mentioned would already make the "affordable" part a non-starter.
Satrad hasn't produced an interoperable receiver because there is, as yet, no demand for them. The merger is still awaiting all regulatory approvals, and even after the merger becomes fact, the proposed pricing structure will still permit the individual channel line-ups to be sold a la carte, if that's what some customers want. Even if the merger weren't in the works, duplication of subscriptions between the two satrad companies is so insignificant as to be off the radar.