• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

February 2013 Ratings

brightonboris said:
leegart said:
Is it too early for CBS to start worrying about Amp?


You people just don't get it. Amp made the pie smaller for Kiss. It's doing its job as designed.

I was expecting to see more of an uptick for AMP’s numbers with the addition of on-air hosts.
 
CatCall said:
brightonboris said:
leegart said:
Is it too early for CBS to start worrying about Amp?


You people just don't get it. Amp made the pie smaller for Kiss. It's doing its job as designed.

I was expecting to see more of an uptick for AMP’s numbers with the addition of on-air hosts.

Is more yack-yack-yack really an effective way of grabbing back listeners who've left FM for personality-free iPods or Internet radio. Why not just run it on autopilot and concertrate on playing the hits the most listeners want to hear? Oh, that's right .. that union contract.
 
brightonboris said:
itsthesong said:
It's a strong start and think of it this way. They are already doing better than they were as a talk station. So it's a win.

It's not if they're not in Top 5 for 25-54W after one year.

And yet they've been on for just over two months, and their morning show has been in place for only a couple of weeks. For crying out loud, give them a chance.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom