• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

fisher

Funny how people on this board pick on Seattle stations so easily, claiming stations lose their focus (Kokomo anyone?), yet here we can go from Fisher to how social media is used in a heartbeat.

Very entertaining.
 
AQH said:
Funny how people on this board pick on Seattle stations so easily, claiming stations lose their focus (Kokomo anyone?), yet here we can go from Fisher to how social media is used in a heartbeat.

Very entertaining.

I'm entertained by many posts here as well, as I'm sure many of my posts have entertained others. However, I'm not sure I get your latest post. Care to clarify? Fisher, social media? Not sure I get your connection.
 
crainbebo said:
Know what? I don't use Facebook, Twitter or any "social media", and absolutely NO texting. Just the telephone and e-mail. And NO I will not go extinct thank you very much.

-crainbebo

Ignorance is bliss my friend. Keep riding that river in Egypt. I am willing to bet you are over 60. Most people that age aren't open to change and new concepts. What's that saying about old dogs?
 
Wait- isn't this blog site/discussion board "social media"? I'm pretty sure it's not a telephone or an email.

On a more relevant point, here is an interesting sidebar to the Fisher/Belo every TV group in the world being bought up/out.

It's an article on how the FCC wants to re-sell TV spectrum so old guys like me can use them new fangled wireless devices more efficiently. And how TV station owners can pocket some cash.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/technology/fcc-approves-auction-process-for-spectrum.html?_r=1&
 
Still think the necessary step here is to define future of radio (but FCC won't have the b@ll$ for it). If broadcasters know future of spectrum use, they could make plans to give up unused portion according to a timetable. We SOMEHOW managed to get TV into digital with a coordinated transition...why not radio?
 
Steenman said:
Wait- isn't this blog site/discussion board "social media"? I'm pretty sure it's not a telephone or an email.

On a more relevant point, here is an interesting sidebar to the Fisher/Belo every TV group in the world being bought up/out.

It's an article on how the FCC wants to re-sell TV spectrum so old guys like me can use them new fangled wireless devices more efficiently. And how TV station owners can pocket some cash.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/technology/fcc-approves-auction-process-for-spectrum.html?_r=1&

This is what I hear KVOS plans to do eventually......
 
LITTLEBOYBLUE said:
Still think the necessary step here is to define future of radio (but FCC won't have the b@ll$ for it). If broadcasters know future of spectrum use, they could make plans to give up unused portion according to a timetable. We SOMEHOW managed to get TV into digital with a coordinated transition...why not radio?
Funny, I was just reading the same thing yesterday over on the HD Radio board, and people over there don't seem to believe it's possible, though I didn't see any reasons as to why not. Here's my theory though, TV is far less common than radio. No not in popularity, TV is just as, if not more popular than radio. However, the most number of sets I've seen in any house is 4. I'm not sure how many radios this particular family has, but I think it's more than that. We have 2 TVs, and I have that many radios of my own, actually probably more than that. I do agree that HD either should go up into the unused frequencies in a similar way to the way it works today so as to not interfere with analogue, but like I said, it would be a harder sell. Not only is the number of sets an issue, but if I know people without cable or satilite, it's only 1 or 2 families. There's just no way to have everyone convert to digital as quickly as it could have been done with TV.
 
Steenman said:
Wait- isn't this blog site/discussion board "social media"? I'm pretty sure it's not a telephone or an email.

On a more relevant point, here is an interesting sidebar to the Fisher/Belo every TV group in the world being bought up/out.

It's an article on how the FCC wants to re-sell TV spectrum so old guys like me can use them new fangled wireless devices more efficiently. And how TV station owners can pocket some cash.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/technology/fcc-approves-auction-process-for-spectrum.html?_r=1&

It's a FORUM - not social media. Social Media is completely different. Talking with 22,467 "friends" about what you had for dinner last night is social media...

-crainbebo
 
crainbebo said:
Steenman said:
Wait- isn't this blog site/discussion board "social media"? I'm pretty sure it's not a telephone or an email.

On a more relevant point, here is an interesting sidebar to the Fisher/Belo every TV group in the world being bought up/out.

It's an article on how the FCC wants to re-sell TV spectrum so old guys like me can use them new fangled wireless devices more efficiently. And how TV station owners can pocket some cash.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/technology/fcc-approves-auction-process-for-spectrum.html?_r=1&

It's a FORUM - not social media. Social Media is completely different. Talking with 22,467 "friends" about what you had for dinner last night is social media...

-crainbebo

Well, back to Fisher for a second, looks like their newscasts won some more Emmys this year.

http://investor.fsci.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=61026&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1835695&highlight=

I hope Sinclair doesn't fool too much with the news department. You don't win Emmys by being cheap and low rate
 
Another Fisher defection - KOMO sales manager bolts for Entercom.

boiseengineer said:
From Inside Radio
"The company has set a special shareholder meeting for August 6 at its Seattle headquarters for a vote on the $373.3 million deal."
http://www.insideradio.com/

And heads start rolling August 7? What's you over/under on how soon the Sinclair slashing begins?
 
Still no logo on the lower right on KOMO 4 News. This has gone beyond a mistake, it must be intentional. Wonder if Sinclair wants to do something different with the logo and are providing guidance, or perhaps KOMO is refusing to use it as a protest against Sinclair. Who knows. Just interesting that a continuous logo, standard on 99% of local news stations, has been missing on KOMO 4 for weeks now. Yes, I'm a local news geek, but this is something that stands out to me. (The logo is still used on the weather portions, and as a quick transitioner between stories). Something is up here, but I'm not sure what. Perhaps an insider could provide some info as to the mood inside Fisher here in the summer of '13.
 
Either it's going to turn into "ABC 4" or they are protesting against the Sinclair deal, as you said. I hope it's the latter. I don't need a bare-bones "ABC 4" on our superior ABC station. That would be a ratings dive.

-crainbebo
 
Sources say the mood is "business is usual" inside the Plaza. Those sources also say they expect that will change as August 6 nears.
 
Hey, what's wrong with NOT having a logo on the screen throughout every broadcast? The worst local logo is KING-5 and KONG-6 with its every-30-seconds twist and twirl. I mean, really, what the hell is that for? The more visual garbage you see on the screen, the more I think the people who run those channels really have a low self-esteem issue they're dealing with. Or they aren't convinced that anyone is watching unless they see dancing graphics. It was especially discouraging to see stuff popping up every ten minutes or so in the middle of Ken Burns' visually stunning documentaries on PBS.

If the honchos can take a moment to remember what each broadcast is actually about, maybe the inappropriate and distracting vsual clutter might start to be reduced, as it appears is being mentioned here with KOMO-TVs newscasts. I think the national network newscasts are starting to look like a biker with too many tattoos. Just 'cuz CNN does it doesn't mean you should! Heck, we know what channel we're watching, and it's not as it the news set itself doesn't tell you.

The latest trend that throws in millisecond white strobe flashes in the middle of everything is driving me away from KING-5 newscasts and a lot of other stuff on TV. What, are they trying to give me a seizure on the big screen, or to make sure I don't fall asleep at 11:40pm?? Jeez, I got me a bad case of the jitters from watching promos and commericals on TV! I wonder how subliminally it's affecting other viewers?
 
Valid points.

However, it goes against the grain, and that is what I am calling out.

I notice that the general KOMO TV logo (non-news) now has added the ABC logo to the package. Perhaps this has been going on for awhile, and I am just noticing it.

The flash graphics irritate me as well, but you would think the constant bug would be important in a competitive news market. That is what I don't get. Oh well, Fisher probably doesn't care much at this point...Sinclair will soon be makng the calls.
 
Just the scrolling news tickers at the bottom of the screen drives me nuts.

I think Cox has done a fairly good job with KIRO-TV. I'm not one to say nice things about media conglomerates (simply because there aren't many nice things to say about them), but at least they get it when it comes to KIRO-TV's newscasts: Don't mess too much with it. (1993's "News Out Of The Box" anyone?)

But Gannett and Sinclair bug me. Cox is actually pretty SMALL compared to how FAT these conglomerates are going to get once the Belo and Fisher deals are finally consummated.

Sinclair is pretty conservative leaning, I'm not sure about Gannett. Gannett's only notable impact here previously was owning the stuffy Bellingham Herald (1971-2005) and KHIT/KNUA 106.9 (1986-1990.)

I can only give you an idea of what the new KOMO-TV news theme music might sound like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU9zoZILJsk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xrAhM-tEnY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU8j2CVvtXU
 
I just wonder also how this going to affect sister stations KATU-2 and KIMA-29. Will Portland's "KAY-TWO" turn into a generic "ABC 2" branding, and I also wonder if KIMA's branding will change to a bare-bones "CBS-29" as well. Are news logos missing from the K-2 and KIMA newscasts?

-crainbebo
 
crainbebo said:
Are news logos missing from the K-2 and KIMA newscasts?

KATU is still sporting its curvy swan 2 with a red background. They also have a twitter "hash tag" like KOMO, though.
I heard through the grapevine that Fisher's northwest 'hub' at KATU's building was told today their jobs are remaining here when Sinclair takes over.
 
A well-respected Internet newsletter Taylored to radio reports Fisher has settled a major shareholder class-action lawsuit, pushing the merger further toward completion.

The shareholders meeting is next Tuesday.

Finally, the same newsletter reported second-quarter radio revenue was down 2% because of "market softness".
 
If you want to see annoying scrools, crashing graphics, etc., please come down and visit me in Phoenix. The Gannett station here is famous for putting everything at the bottom of the screen. They did get rid of the set that turned "bright red" when there was "Breaking News", though

The Belo station here is the least flashy. Many here consider it "boring". You guys may have a rude awakening when Gannett and Sinclair bring their flashy, generic product to Seattle with cheap talent. I wonder how long Gannett is going to want to pay Jean Enersen's salary or Sinclair with Dan Lewis' salary. It's going to get very interesting...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom