• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

For The Life o' Me

I can't understand why there isn't an Adult Standards station in this market playing everything from Tony Bennett, Sinatra, Bobby Vinton, Ella Fitzgerald, Streisand to early Beatles, Smokey Robinson and Roy Orbison. (740 AM doesn't count.) What the HELL was Little Caesar thinking when he flipped WECK to classic country?!

Sure, I know the 26 year old media buyers don't get it, but screw the agencies, go direct to the clients and let them see that people who are 63 have cash dollars to spend.

Plus, as Sammy Davis might have said, "It's a groovy little format, bay-bee!"
[/Mike]
_________________________________________________
"I'd like an off-white with some lime tint, but not green... sort of a hint of blue, like the ice cubes in my drink... can I get you a vodka and tonic?"

"Mo ma'm, I'm working... besides, it's a little early in the day... being just past 9:30."

-Never a dull moment when you paint for a livin'.
 
Radknowski said:
I can't understand why there isn't an Adult Standards station in this market playing everything from Tony Bennett, Sinatra, Bobby Vinton, Ella Fitzgerald, Streisand to early Beatles, Smokey Robinson and Roy Orbison. (740 AM doesn't count.) What the HELL was Little Caesar thinking when he flipped WECK to classic country?!

Sure, I know the 26 year old media buyers don't get it, but screw the agencies, go direct to the clients and let them see that people who are 63 have cash dollars to spend.

Plus, as Sammy Davis might have said, "It's a groovy little format, bay-bee!"
[/Mike]
_________________________________________________
Expecially when it's a format that a certain CDN FM station out there can't do, in an effort to serve Buffalo. ;)

I think CRTC should back off a bit and let the CDN stations, near US borders, have a little more freedom, and a little less crtc regs.

(and hey?...isnt the format more profitable than tourist information, if it must stay on AM?...there's an option...)
 
Oh, how I agree with you, Mike! WECK has tanked in the ratings with classic country. It's now a non-factor in this market. Meanwhile, AM 740, with absolutely no promotion in the Buffalo market, has a decent share. There is a place in the Buffalo market for a standards format. I don't know if the decision was Jeff Silver's or if it came down from the corporate level. But I can't understand how executives who make these kinds of decisions remain employed. Here's a case where WECK had an acceptable share for an AM station with a marginal signal. Now the station has virtually no audience! And this was a good move? This is why radio is dying! The industry should be run by people like Mark Giardina, Jim Pastrick and even, you, Mike (if you'd be willing to put down the paint brush).
 
WECK has tanked in the ratings with classic country. It's now a non-factor in this market. Meanwhile, AM 740, with absolutely no promotion in the Buffalo market, has a decent share. There is a place in the Buffalo market for a standards format. I don't know if the decision was Jeff Silver's or if it came down from the corporate level. But I can't understand how executives who make these kinds of decisions remain employed.
Standards hit the wall. Say what you will about the America Songbook, the format appeals primarily to listeners 65+. Nothing inherently wrong with that, but selling those numbers isn't as easy as it was ten, maybe even five years ago when the format pulled big 12+ numbers. Say what you will about Mr. Silver and CBS, the cluster makes mounds of money. They must be doing something right. And if the Standards format was so great, why didn't KB, WJJL, WSPQ, WLVL or some other U.S. station go with it?
-9-
 
So let's see it's better to have no numbers rather than appeal to the older demos? That just doesn't make sense to me. Seems like someone needs to learn how to make those older demos profitable since that's where the format hole is ;D.
 
Let's hope that whoever ends up buying the CBS cluster in Buffalo will have the good sense to revert WECK back to its former glory. Although I woulnd't hold my breath on that. The sad reality is the format is dying all over the country. Two recent examples can be found not too far from Buffalo. Little WGGO in Salamanca had a standards format for years, perhaps even decades. But with the station now in the hands of a group owner (Pembrooke Pines), it just wasn't good enough. So now its ESPN Radio all day every day. And WDOE in Dunkirk recently abandoned the format for Oldies. How many more stations will say "screw you" to seniors and other people who just plain enjoy good music?
 
Indeed, standards appeal to an over 65 audience. But I know plenty of younger folk in the 35 to 55 range who also enjoyed the format and listened to WECK. Listen, WECK was making money from what I understand. I remember reading a post on this board that the station was billing a million a year. Whether that's true or not, I don't know. But I heard plenty of ads on that station. So what if they were Cadillac dealerships? The station had a 2 to 3 share and was making money. With country, it has no audience. And if it is making money, the advertisers are pissing their dollars away on a radio station that no one is listening to. Yes, CBS makes money because it has success stories with WYRK, WJYE and WBLK. But its management has screwed up WBUF and WECK. Had Entercom stayed the course with its oldies format on KB, the station probably would have seen an increase in its audience after the WECK change. But they didn't give it a chance either and changed to a talk format that is being virtually ignored. Just because the morons running the big radio groups are avoiding standards doesn't mean it is no longer a viable format. Older people have dollars. Yes, they may be more set in their buying habits than youngsters. But they still need to buy things, and advertisers selling the things they need would use a standards station to reach them.
 
Here in Rochester WLGZ, Legends 990 seems to be doing ok with the format - I think they have been doing it for over 5 years - and with a local staff(I think they are live during the daytime, m-f). An interesting thing is they seem to be playing more light oldies from the rock era(Elvis, Beatles, Righteous Brothers, etc.) and even run the syndicated Beatle Brunch on the weekend. As mentioned in an previous post on this board, they run another syndicated weekly program that mixes Pop Standards with the Doors and other rock artists(yes, a really broad mix, but interesting nonethless).

I would say while Pop Standards will die out with their audience(as will all oldies formats eventually) it would have made sense for WECK(or perhaps KB) to re-tool their format a little and retain their 65 plus audience while getting some aging boomers who don't mind hearing Pat Boone and Rosemary Clooney mixed in with soft rock oldies. Beats getting a zero with Classic Country.

Just my humble opinion.
 
raymond_shaw said:
I would say while Pop Standards will die out with their audience(as will all oldies formats eventually) it would have made sense for WECK(or perhaps KB) to re-tool their format a little and retain their 65 plus audience while getting some aging boomers who don't mind hearing Pat Boone and Rosemary Clooney mixed in with soft rock oldies.

Yes, exactly. I think there is room for a fringe station in a lot of markets that plays an UPDATED version of standards/easy listening/MOR. Sorry, that means dropping Rosemary and Pat.
 
Philip_Airtime said:
Indeed, standards appeal to an over 65 audience. But I know plenty of younger folk in the 35 to 55 range who also enjoyed the format and listened to WECK. Listen, WECK was making money from what I understand. I remember reading a post on this board that the station was billing a million a year. Whether that's true or not, I don't know. But I heard plenty of ads on that station. So what if they were Cadillac dealerships? The station had a 2 to 3 share and was making money. With country, it has no audience. And if it is making money, the advertisers are pissing their dollars away on a radio station that no one is listening to. Yes, CBS makes money because it has success stories with WYRK, WJYE and WBLK. But its management has screwed up WBUF and WECK. Had Entercom stayed the course with its oldies format on KB, the station probably would have seen an increase in its audience after the WECK change. But they didn't give it a chance either and changed to a talk format that is being virtually ignored. Just because the morons running the big radio groups are avoiding standards doesn't mean it is no longer a viable format. Older people have dollars. Yes, they may be more set in their buying habits than youngsters. But they still need to buy things, and advertisers selling the things they need would use a standards station to reach them.

Years ago here in Rochester the number one station was WEZO, which carried an EZ listening format. And even when a group of I wanna play radio station kids from Boston came in and switched the FM format to AM, WEZO-AM had a 3 share, which isn't bad considering that the owners never spent a dime promoting the station. So you're correct when you say there is an audience out there for that kind of music.

The problem with WLGZ, as it was with WNYR and WEZO-AM is that the 990 frequency isn't bad, but that format would be better suited on an FM station. And with the pending sale of the CBS clusters in Rochester, and the dismal ratings some other FM stations have, one would think that "somebody" would at least consider trying an adult format.

WLGZ does have an FM sister station but that's dedicated to religion. Now if Crawford wanted to make money they would switch formats. Put the religious stuff on 990 and their music on their FM station. But what do I know. After all I was the one who 20 plus years ago suggested having a county station on FM and was told by the then general manager and sales manager that county music on FM in Rochester wouldn't sell. Gee I guess WBEE must be a figment of my imagination.
 
I guess there's nobody in this thread who would "poo-poo" WBEN's ratings because they're all supposedly over 50...

Have all those people finally left this board?

Back to the topic at hand: Nobody wants to program to a greying market (and let's face it, with all due respect, the number of people you "know under 40 who like this kind of music is miniscule compared to the number of people under 40 who live in the area); nobody wants to grab the available advertising dollars because (at least to them) there's more money to be made sharing the same piece of pie that everybody else has on their plate.

And now that I've mixed metaphors ad naseum, I'll go back to my morning coffee and prune juice... :p
 
I guess there's nobody in this thread who would "poo-poo" WBEN's ratings because they're all supposedly over 50... Have all those people finally left this board?
No, DB, we're still here, but some of use would like to think we're objective when we criticize WBEN or any other station's programming and/or ratings. That's why I gave them their due on the WHLD-WWKB thread. Still, they're far from the ratings killer they think they are or might spin themselves to be.
Back to the topic at hand: Nobody wants to program to a greying market (and let's face it, with all due respect, the number of people you "know under 40 who like this kind of music is miniscule compared to the number of people under 40 who live in the area); nobody wants to grab the available advertising dollars because (at least to them) there's more money to be made sharing the same piece of pie that everybody else has on their plate.
You're certainly right in this regard. The Adult Standards format might give a few "under 40 boomer types" a little tickle from time to time, but WECK wasn't likely their primary station. At best it may have been their third or fourth station, tuned in whenever the feeling struck them. Guys like Radknowski get on the board, start a WECK Lovefest and when we read the responses, it makes it sound like WECK was their number one station. C'mon, they liked the station because it was a momentary diversion from the constant pounding of Zep, Stones, Beatles, AC-DC or body-piercing music and rap their kids listen to.
And now that I've mixed metaphors ad naseum, I'll go back to my morning coffee and prune juice... :p
Be careful about mixing that stuff! You'll find yourself parked on the porcelain and your tochis will look the Target Dog's eye!

At the risk of contradicting myself here and an earlier post, let me say that money can be made selling the 55+ demo, but it takes diligence and knowledge not only of the product, the potential consumer and the buying customer. Guys like Stan Roberts probably made a handsome return selling WECK. The guy's smooth, sharp and knows radio and the clients. Most of all, the clients and listeners know STAN.

And here's where one of the biggest problems with radio crops up: Take a look at the people selling radio today. Do you see many "Stan Roberts types?" Stations impose "caps on earnings" by cutting lists by redistribution and hiring young guns to sell. Ain't nothin' wrong with young guns IF they know what the hell they're doing, but let's face it... a good many don't know the difference between a share and a cume, a GRP and a CPM. It takes time to learn this stuff and properly use it. Now, I'm fully aware that the business needs a continual infusion of new blood in sales and on the air. I also know that new clients MUST be developed through constant prospecting.

Yet, we often belittle our business by saying "It's not rocket science." No, it's not... but it IS science and it IS an art and we DO work with ARTISTS and SCIENTISTS in programming, sales, production and on the air... but damned if the COO's and CEO's let alone the GM's give these people proper credit for being ARTISTS, PERFORMERS and SCIENTISTS.

Every GM thinks he/she can program... many think there's nothing to being on the air. Any monkey can do it. Well, any monkey CAN'T do it. The GM's who've risen through the ranks of programming, sales and management know what it takes to be good on the air every day. Yet many GM's don't have a clue. And how many sales GM's have lost their street sales instincts?

Rarely does a guy who's been on the air for seven months sounds as good as a guy who's been on the air for seven years. The same applies for (good) people who've been selling for seven months vs. seven years.

What's happening is the experienced and knowledgeable Sales Managers are taken off the street, being forced to hire rookies and newbies, tutor and mentor them in the corporate mold, then set them loose on the street to sell. What's the attrition rate with sales people who aren't radio-centered these days?

Hey, "sales is sales," ain't it? You can sell a vacuum, you can sell radio time. Here's the Yellow Pages kid, develop a list!

Back to WECK and American Standards: We live in an age-discriminatory society. Everything has to be "the latest and the newest." Consumers want the newest, biggest LCD TV's when a good 19 CRT inch might serve the purpose. Gotta have a Blackberry and a camera phone. Gotta have a new car every three years (or sooner) and a bigger and better one at that. I'm almost as guilty as the next guy, but at least I know what my sins are.

America is going broke and morally bankrupting itself. You hit 55 as a salesman (or jock) and the potential of catching a bullet increases exponentially, no matter how good you are or how much revenue you've generated. Your list gets cut, redistributed (because as we all know, account lists are the property of the radio station not the AE) and the clients that may have taken a year or two to convince to buy radio or your format get shifted to a 24 year old ex-Hooters Girl who can wiggle her way into any agency in America. Sorry, sounds sexists, it's not intended.

I'm not a Ludite nor do I espouse a "return to the good old days." I like my fast computer and microwave, plus, that lime green refrigerator and oven never appealed to me in the first place. It's not my intent to preach, moralize or politicize the issues. I know full well this is a RADIO board. But let's call a plum a plum here.

WECK was a neat little station, yes. It alledgedly billed a million a year. There's not a small market manager who wouldn't drool for that kind of money. The station ran on a shoestring, so its stand-alone cashflow should have been solid. Yet, something or somebody forced a format change and no other station in the market picked up the format.

Is the reason because the station or the American Standards format requires experienced, mature sales people to successfully sell it?

Perhaps we've reached the crux of the matter.
-9-
 
I'd like to comment on a couple of points you've made, but I can't for the life of me figure out how to show several quotes in one post (probably the mixture of coffee and prune juice).
Can you help an older feller out here? :-\
 
WLGZ does have an FM sister station but that's dedicated to religion. Now if Crawford wanted to make money they would switch formats. Put the religious stuff on 990 and their music on their FM station.

I would agree with you but I bet they make a lot of money on the religious stuff on FM and that is why they do it. Probably WLGZ is just frosting on the cake.
I still would like to hear WLGZ on FM with more Neil Diamond and Bread and less Al Jolson and Kate Smith. Hey, I am a baby boomer & that stuff is way before my time.
 
A Little Help

Debaser said:
I'd like to comment on a couple of points you've made, but I can't for the life of me figure out how to show several quotes in one post (probably the mixture of coffee and prune juice).

Can you help an older feller out here? :-\

It's actually pretty easy. He's using the "quote" tag. Just hit the "quote" button, and it brings up the edit screen that looks something like this:

(quote author=Debaser link=topic=44764.msg306291#msg306291 date=1155916031)
I'd like to comment on a couple of points you've made, but I can't for the life of me figure out how to show several quotes in one post (probably the mixture of coffee and prune juice).

Can you help an older feller out here? :-\(/quote)

Obviously, if I leave a [ in there instead of a (, and a ] instead of a ), you'll just see the quote box again. To split the quoted passages, just insert (quote) (/quote) tags like this:

(quote author=Debaser link=topic=44764.msg306291#msg306291 date=1155916031)
I'd like to comment on a couple of points you've made, but I can't for the life of me figure out how to show several quotes in one post (probably the mixture of coffee and prune juice).(/quote)

(quote)Can you help an older feller out here? :-\(/quote)

Once again, replace the ( with [ and ) with ], and you too can be a programmer!
 
WECK was a good station that offered some very good music from a time when musicianship, arrangements and vocal stylings counted for something. I'm a boomer who occasionally listened to WECK's old format, yet miss having that option since it changed format to classic country.

My 79 year old, very active and healthy parents listened to WECK all the time and miss the station very much. It may sound trite, but it brought back fond memories for them and may have helped them feel younger. I burned a dozen big band and standards CD's for them but it's not the same. There's something special about a favorite radio station whether a person's 29, 49 or 79.

WECK now is nothing more than just another AM radio station with a meaningless format, rather than the special station it once was when it played standards. Whoever made the decision to change the format made a serious mistake, but it can be undone and made right. Think of the goodwill bringing back the standards format might generate with listeners my parents' age. The post about being an age discriminating society and the other post about new owners bringing the standards format back make good points.
 
The industry should be run by people like Mark Giardina, Jim Pastrick and even, you, Mike (if you'd be willing to put down the paint brush).
I'll leave that up to the other two guys. I have my spackled and spattered hands full.
 
Re: A Little Help

SirRoxalot said:
It's actually pretty easy. He's using the "quote" tag. Just hit the "quote" button, and it brings up the edit screen that looks something like this:

[Obviously, if I leave a [ in there instead of a (, and a ] instead of a ), you'll just see the quote box again. To split the quoted passages, just insert (quote) (/quote) tags like this:]


Once again, replace the ( with [ and ) with ], and you too can be a programmer!

OK...this is a test and only a test. Had it been a real post, you would have been told to visit a different URL...

Of course, now I have forgotten what I wanted to say in the first place...
 
Visit from the Elf...

...That would be "Forgetful the Elf".

BTW, what are you doing in this room in the first place. You KNOW you came in here for something...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom