• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Former Arizona Sheriff Sues CNN

https://www.ftvlive.com/sqsp-test/2018/12/13/sheriff-joe-sues-cnn


Former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio filed a defamation lawsuit seeking $300 million in damages against three news organizations, saying their inaccurate references to his criminal conviction have hurt his chances at possibly running in for the Senate seat that was held by John McCain.

The lawsuit, filed in Washington, alleges that CNN, Huffington Post and Rolling Stone acted with malice by publishing statements they knew were not true. In the suit, Arpaio says CNN did not make any effort to correct a statement by anchor Chris Cuomo in a January broadcast that said he was a convicted felon. Arpaio's 2017 criminal contempt of court conviction -- for disobeying a judge's order to stop his immigration patrols -- was a misdemeanor, rather than a felony.


Yes a former Arizona Sheriff's officer accuses certain member of the media of defamation and CNN just happens to be one of them
 
The pardon was irrelevant. His offense was categorized as a misdemeanor, not a felony.
That might have been an honest mistake by CNN, but it seems they are gonna pay for it.
 
What a bogus lawsuit,,Saying felony instead of misdemeanor is something you can sue about? If thats the case I’m surprised that every democrat, especially President Obama is not suing Fox News for similar comments and innuendos.
 
Malice is a pretty tough thing to prove. They also have to prove the anchor knew it wasn't true.

Maybe, but he'll end up with a formal apology and get to publicize CNN's incompetence at a minimum. They may just agree to a settlement too.
 
The case will likely settle. Joe Arpaio is 86 years old.
Likely he does not want this case to wind it's usual course through the courts.

CNN likely also wants to make this go away quickly and quietly, as it shines a
spotlight on some shoddy, sloppy journalism.
 
Maybe, but he'll end up with a formal apology and get to publicize CNN's incompetence at a minimum. They may just agree to a settlement too.


Actually, at a minimum, the judge could throw the case out for insufficient evidence. They're claiming one word, at one time, almost a year ago MIGHT affect his decision to run for Senate. He hasn't said he's running, and he lost his last election. This falls in the category of "frivolous." Especially given the amount of damages he's seeking.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom