• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Future TV Anchors

M

Mark_Giardina

Guest
Just for the fun of it, let’s look down the road a few years and guess who might replace the current TV anchors on Rochester television once they retire or leave.
Mind you this is just an observation on my part and by no means do I have any inside information, or psychic abilities, that what I’m about to write will actually happen. And please, feel free to add your own thoughts and opinions.

At WHAM TV it has been a forgone conclusion for a number of years both in and outside the industry that Doug Emblidge will be Channel 13’s lead anchor once Don Alhart retires. Personally I would be shocked if the management at 13 either promoted someone else to be Alhart’s replacement or hired an individual from outside the Rochester market. Emblidge, like Alhart, is a known quantity. Doug is likeable person, both on and off the air, and has been quite active in the community for many years. Regarding Ginny Ryan, I have no idea who would replace her. Not that 13 doesn’t have enough female staffers. The recent promotion of Holly Maynard to morning anchor is one clue that she might be considered anchor material for the evening newscasts. Personally I think the strongest contender would be Christine Webb.

Over at Channel 10, the question of who would replace Rich Funke is a bit more difficult to answer. Originally, as some of you might remember, Brian Martin was named to be 10’s main anchor when Gabe Dalmath “retired”. Martin’s tenure as anchor however was short-lived because, as some sources claim, Martin and 10’s management didn’t see eye-to-eye when it came to a salary increase. So while Martin was moved from the anchor’s chair to field reporter, and eventually left the station for another job, Funke was tapped to be 10’s co-anchor for their 5, 6 and 11pm newscasts.

Rich, like Don and Doug, is a likeable person both on and off the air and is well known in the community. And while 10 has a fine staff of veteran reporters, at the moment it would be anyone’s guess who would be selected to replace Funke should the day come he decides to retire. As for Janet Lomax’s replacement, the only person I see waiting in the wings would be Jennifer Johnson, 10’s current weekend anchor.

As for Channel 8, I’ve always maintained that Maureen McGuire is one of the best anchors on Rochester TV. Unfortunately WROC has a history of self-destructing. The station has never fully recovered from the strike of the 1970s when Tom Decker, Bob Mills and Mort Nusbaum were replaced by a series of revolving door anchors and reporters. Now, from what I understand, the station might face another personnel shake-up. So it’s really difficult to predict what will happen over there on Humboldt Street. My own personal observation is that if McGuire and Scott Hetsko, along with Dave McKinley and Rachael Barnhart ever left, or were replaced, 8 would really be in the ratings doghouse.

Last, but not least, looking at both FOX-31 and R-News.

What ever happens to Channel 8’s operation will impact FOX-31’s 10 o’clock news just because of the partnership, collaboration, whatever you want to call it, between WROC and WUHF. Personally I just can’t imagine that Lia Lando would turn down an opportunity to move on to a larger market if offered the chance. And let's be honest, would it really matter who anchors the 10 o'clock news on FOX?

As for R-News, the guessing game is whether R-News will be around in a few years. At least in its current format.

I would be curious to hear from people in Buffalo and Syracuse to their opinions about future anchor positions in their respective markets


<P ID="signature">______________
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted and I won't be laid a hand on.
I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them".</P>
 
> Just for the fun of it, let’s look down the road a few years
> and guess who might replace the current TV anchors on
> Rochester television once they retire or leave.
> Mind you this is just an observation on my part and by no
> means do I have any inside information, or psychic
> abilities, that what I’m about to write will actually
> happen. And please, feel free to add your own thoughts and
> opinions.

The good news for Rochester TV managers; this isn't likely to emerge as an issue for any of the major stations in the market for another 5 years or so.
Don Alhart, IIRC, is under contract through 2010 and the reports are, he plans to fulfill it before thinking about retiring. (He'd be 65 or 66 at that time.) I believe Rich Funke is several years younger than Alhart, and Janet Lomax younger still, which means Channel 10 has even longer to line up its bench, probably until 2012, 2013 or later.
The better news for Channel 13 is that Mark's right...when 2010 comes, 13 has a clear plan in place.
The not-so-good news for 10; it may need all of those 7 or 8 years to get the next generation of anchors identified and established, so it's an issue they need to begin addressing now.
I haven't mentioned Channel 8. Their talent base is, by and large, younger than 10 or 13. If they're willing to stay the course, their current anchor team could last another 20 years and if the station's management plays it smart, they can make serious inroads. Question is, will they promote, will they try to do the things you need to do to build audience, and be patient when the results come slowly at first before reaching critical mass?

Now to Buffalo.
Channel 2 is competitive with an anchor team which is relatively young and will be around quite a while, so let's leave them aside in this discussion.
Channel 4? Most of their frontline talent is also going to be around for a while barring a move to a larger market...Don Postles is the most senior guy in the group and IIRC he's got 7 or 8 years before he'd be thinking of packing it in. Same with Rich Newberg. Jacquie Walker's younger, and the morning team younger still. Time to start thinking ahead, but no reason to do it in a panic.
Channel 7 is the perfect example of a station which DIDN'T have a plan when its frontline talent all hit the magic age and retired almost at once. Weinstein, Jolls, Azar, the guys who took them to a commanding #1 in the 1960s and kept them there through almost all of the 1990s...all gone, and of their replacements, only sports director John Murphy has really clicked. They'll need to think carefully about the next move, but then make the move quickly, if they want to compete in the future...
 
> As for Janet
> Lomax’s replacement, the only person I see waiting in the
> wings would be Jennifer Johnson, 10’s current weekend
> anchor.

Oh my. Let's hope that day is a long, long way off.

> My
> own personal observation is that if McGuire and Scott
> Hetsko, along with Dave McKinley and Rachael Barnhart ever
> left, or were replaced, 8 would really be in the ratings
> doghouse.
>

Let's hope that Hetsko and Barnhart are able to stick around for a while. I think Hetsko stands a good chance of replacing Kevin Williams as the Rochester meteorologist of record a few years down the road. Nobody at 13 has as much personality or likeability, and Josh Nichols is a nice guy, but doesn't have the same charisma that Hetsko brings to the table. Barnhart comes across as a natural to move into the anchor chair. She's been making a name for herself with some excellent reporting, and she seems to do better than most fill-ins when she has the occiasion to slip behind the desk.
 
I gotta be honest with you- Deanna King over at WHEC news 10 has not been along that much, but I find her very credible. As Rochester seems to hire so many young females based solely on appearance and youth- here is an attractive and talented young lady. Her writing is sound and she needs to be on the desk.

I also think that the Rich Funke experiment is not working.

Down the road I see Jennifer Johnson on six and eleven... and Nikki Rudd staying put. D King should be the new morning girl there.
 
With just a little knowledge of these stations it's easy to see their succession plans.

At Channel 8, Kevin will be around for decades to come. McGuire has fallen out of favor, but Katrina Irwin is being seriously groomed. With Scott H and John K along, they have an excellent team. Tough s--- no one watches. P.S. - News actress Lia Lando will be gone in -2 years.

At Channel 13, the foundation is set for the next 30 years. Emlidge will take over for Alhart. Ginny has as much time left as she wants. Evan Dawson is the clear successor to Emblidge. Channel 13 has his name and face everywhere. If Holly Maynard stays in Rochester, Ginny's job is hers in years to come. Alhart - Emblidge - Dawson. Ryan - Maynard. Everyone else at Channel 13 is just taking up space and wasting time.

At Channel 10, the picture is more fuzzy. Most of their newscasts are hard to watch. Miss Johnson is a delight, but will she stay in Rochester? Prolly not. The Lomax & Funke experiment has gotta be on thin ice. No one else at Channel 10 seems ready to take over. Brian Martin? Brian where are you? Brian?

At Rnews, it doesn't matter if everyone quits tomorrow. TimeWarner will just restart the pre-recorded newswheel and run it over and over and over and over and over.
 
rochachawatch said:
With just a little knowledge of these stations it's easy to see their succession plans.

At Channel 8, Kevin will be around for decades to come. McGuire has fallen out of favor, but Katrina Irwin is being seriously groomed. With Scott H and John K along, they have an excellent team. Tough s--- no one watches. P.S. - News actress Lia Lando will be gone in -2 years.

At Channel 13, the foundation is set for the next 30 years. Emlidge will take over for Alhart. Ginny has as much time left as she wants. Evan Dawson is the clear successor to Emblidge. Channel 13 has his name and face everywhere. If Holly Maynard stays in Rochester, Ginny's job is hers in years to come. Alhart - Emblidge - Dawson. Ryan - Maynard. Everyone else at Channel 13 is just taking up space and wasting time.

At Channel 10, the picture is more fuzzy. Most of their newscasts are hard to watch. Miss Johnson is a delight, but will she stay in Rochester? Prolly not. The Lomax & Funke experiment has gotta be on thin ice. No one else at Channel 10 seems ready to take over. Brian Martin? Brian where are you? Brian?

At Rnews, it doesn't matter if everyone quits tomorrow. TimeWarner will just restart the pre-recorded newswheel and run it over and over and over and over and over.

WOW I posted this four months ago and suddendly it re-appears. Thanks to all who replied.

I am really interested in rochachawatch's comments especially pertaining to Channel 8. Even with my sources inside of 201 Humboldt Street, I wasn't aware that McGuire is out of favor. Can you elaborate more on that? I do agree that Hetsko is 8's future. Lando, well I can't argue with you that she won't stick around this market forever.

13 of course is a solid an operation one could ask for. Those people are smart. They've planned ahead when it comes to succession. What did Ross Perot once say " The Japanese plan ten years in advance and America ten minutes."

As for 10, again I wasn't aware that the Funke/Lomax thing isn't working.
 
My own personal observation is that if McGuire and Scott Hetsko, along with Dave McKinley and Rachael Barnhart ever left, or were replaced, 8 would really be in the ratings doghouse.

Newsflash...Rachel Barnhart is working at Channel 13 these days.
 
tvnewswatcher said:
My own personal observation is that if McGuire and Scott Hetsko, along with Dave McKinley and Rachael Barnhart ever left, or were replaced, 8 would really be in the ratings doghouse.

Newsflash...Rachel Barnhart is working at Channel 13 these days.

I am aware of that. I used Barnhart in the context of the important role she played at 8.
 
I agree. Rebecca LeClair needs to step aside and let someone else become the new face of Channel 10's morning show. All I ever hear is how awful she is in the morning. Channel 10 will lose the younger talent it has to other stations and markets who are willing to develope them into their own ratings champs. I really don't want to offend any one here but, it is refreshing to see young talent my age on the news and enjoying themselves such as Jennifer Johnson smiling and laughing. The folks at 13WHAM seem to know that, even the middle aged anchors and reporters always seem to be enjoying their work on camera. At times Channel 10 seems that they are trying too hard to act professional, it seems robotic and makes me want to go work outside in this cold! As for Channel 8/31, I'm getting the impression that they are just a stepping stone for employees to get better at what they do and leave for better jobs at other stations and markets where they really won't have to worry about how long they will have a job before management decides an inexperienced person will do the same job for less money till the cycle restarts again. Who wants to work for someone who tells you to do your best work and don't expect more money, this is what you will make or find another job!?
 
Rochwatcher said:
Mckinley is good? ??? He's more of a novelty.

He's the best field reporter 8 has at this time. Plus he's been in the Rochester market long enough to establish good contacts.

I have no personal knowledge of this but if it were not for the no-compete clause it would not surprise me if another Rochester TV station offered McKinley a job.
 
TVnewswatcher...?

tvnewswatcher said:
My own personal observation is that if McGuire and Scott Hetsko, along with Dave McKinley and Rachael Barnhart ever left, or were replaced, 8 would really be in the ratings doghouse.

Newsflash...Rachel Barnhart is working at Channel 13 these days.

Did you read the date of Mark's orgininal date...November 13, 2005...LOL!

Actually I find it interesting that we all agree WHAM is pretty much set in stone, however I keep on having a DISTURBING fantasy...I want revenge on Clear Channel for chaning the call letters from WOKR to George Michael's band, even though there is WHAM AM...I want WHAM to be RAPED by the new owners, hacksaw the operations at WHAM to death... :eek: Don't ask me why, but more competition is needed in the Rochester market is needed and for the process to begin WHAM needs to take that fall just like WKBW did in Buffalo. Then enter WBGT NEWSCENTER 18/40, a brand new WUHF for ten o'clock operations to end the 2300 monopoly.
 
Re: TVnewswatcher...?

Your post is the most disturbing thing I've ever read here...I'm not even going to ask... ::)
 
Mark--You didn't set the bar very high there. Last I checked Ch. 8 had like 5 field reporters--so few they were sending their anchors out occassionally---so if he is the best of that group I am not sure that is saying much. In addition, most of 8's reporters have worked one job before their time there--I would hope a guy of his age would be better than kids that were in college a few years ago! As far as another station offering him a job--I don't know--he's got a bit of a gimmick/schtick that I don't see working at the other stations...sometime I feel as if I am watching a bad comedy routine.


Mark_Giardina said:
Rochwatcher said:
Mckinley is good? ??? He's more of a novelty.

He's the best field reporter 8 has at this time. Plus he's been in the Rochester market long enough to establish good contacts.

I have no personal knowledge of this but if it were not for the no-compete clause it would not surprise me if another Rochester TV station offered McKinley a job.
 
sincitysfavoriteson said:
I agree. Rebecca LeClair needs to step aside and let someone else become the new face of Channel 10's morning show. All I ever hear is how awful she is in the morning. Channel 10 will lose the younger talent it has to other stations and markets who are willing to develope them into their own ratings champs. I really don't want to offend any one here but, it is refreshing to see young talent my age on the news and enjoying themselves such as Jennifer Johnson smiling and laughing. The folks at 13WHAM seem to know that, even the middle aged anchors and reporters always seem to be enjoying their work on camera. At times Channel 10 seems that they are trying too hard to act professional, it seems robotic and makes me want to go work outside in this cold! As for Channel 8/31, I'm getting the impression that they are just a stepping stone for employees to get better at what they do and leave for better jobs at other stations and markets where they really won't have to worry about how long they will have a job before management decides an inexperienced person will do the same job for less money till the cycle restarts again. Who wants to work for someone who tells you to do your best work and don't expect more money, this is what you will make or find another job!?

Did you hit the nail right on the head. The best description of local TV that I've read on this board in a very long time, especially your observations about Channels 8 & 31. As for LeClair, what makes her different than the rest of the "happy face" morning teams on the other channels? At least she brings some personality to 10's early morning news program. They do go a bit overboard with the chuckles at 13 in the morning, especially Norma Holland. At 8, well Rodney Dangerfield is funnier than Barnas and Stelin and Dangerfield has been dead for a few years now.
 
Rochwatcher said:
Mark--You didn't set the bar very high there. Last I checked Ch. 8 had like 5 field reporters--so few they were sending their anchors out occassionally---so if he is the best of that group I am not sure that is saying much. In addition, most of 8's reporters have worked one job before their time there--I would hope a guy of his age would be better than kids that were in college a few years ago! As far as another station offering him a job--I don't know--he's got a bit of a gimmick/schtick that I don't see working at the other stations...sometime I feel as if I am watching a bad comedy routine.

You mean to tell me that 8 is still sending their anchors out in the field? I thought the only reason they did that is because when Barnhart, Chandler and Orosz left they needed warm bodies out there.

As for McKinley's performance, I still say the guy is the best field reporter 8 has. At least he doesn't come across as some deer-in-the-headlights or a Ted Baxter type.
 
Mark_Giardina said:
You mean to tell me that 8 is still sending their anchors out in the field?

Not too familiar with Rochester, but sending anchors in the field isn't such a bad thing. On really big stories, I think it can sometimes be good to see an anchor out there, rather than just sitting on their bottoms in the studio. I also think it lends to their credibility to get out once in awhile. Otherwise, you begin to wonder if they're "losing touch" with reality because they just sit in the newsroom & studio all the time. Heck, sometimes a particularly difficult source for a news story may be more willing to talk to the 20-year veteran anchor, than they would to a reporter who's only been in town a few years. Even at the networks, the evening news anchors occasionally anchor from "remote" locations. I don't think a station should be labeled as "cheap" just because the anchors file field reports. But I do agree, it's bad when anchors are out there reporting "any old story" every day because of necessity.

As for WHAM, it will definitely be interesting to see what happens when Clear Channel sells off its TV division. From what I hear, CC is pretty good to its TV stations, and all the predictions made here could definitely become reality under that ownership. But more often than not, a new owner's first action is to find ways to trim the fat. Unfortunately, whether it's on purpose or not, they usually wind up cutting some prime rib away in the process. Only time will tell if the new ownership will result in any high-profile firings/shakeups/etc. and how such changes will impact the competition.
 
BobRoss said:
As for WHAM, it will definitely be interesting to see what happens when Clear Channel sells off its TV division. From what I hear, CC is pretty good to its TV stations, and all the predictions made here could definitely become reality under that ownership. But more often than not, a new owner's first action is to find ways to trim the fat. Unfortunately, whether it's on purpose or not, they usually wind up cutting some prime rib away in the process. Only time will tell if the new ownership will result in any high-profile firings/shakeups/etc. and how such changes will impact the competition.

Can you imagine what would happen if say a company like Nexstar purchased Channel 13? I will tell you would happen. The bottom-liners would be all over the place looking to save money and that would mean reducing both the on-air and off-air staff. In other words some of these people currently being trained for future anchor positions would be gone, as would some of the veteran reporters who make good money. Alhart has a contact until 2010 so that would have to be honored, unless of course the new company buys him out. I just shutter to think of that scenario.
Hopefully, for 13's sake, Clear Channel will sell the station to a serious broadcasting company and not some nickle and dime operation. You are also correct about the way CC treats its TV operation versus its radio station. The so-called "News Leaders" news staff has been reduced to the minimum after two people were let go last year about part of a cost-cutting measure. I don't remember any similar measures taken over at 13.
 
The title of being the best field reporter at Channel 8 is a bit like being a Canadian Dollar---it's not worth quite as much.




Mark_Giardina said:
Rochwatcher said:
Mark--You didn't set the bar very high there. Last I checked Ch. 8 had like 5 field reporters--so few they were sending their anchors out occassionally---so if he is the best of that group I am not sure that is saying much. In addition, most of 8's reporters have worked one job before their time there--I would hope a guy of his age would be better than kids that were in college a few years ago! As far as another station offering him a job--I don't know--he's got a bit of a gimmick/schtick that I don't see working at the other stations...sometime I feel as if I am watching a bad comedy routine.

You mean to tell me that 8 is still sending their anchors out in the field? I thought the only reason they did that is because when Barnhart, Chandler and Orosz left they needed warm bodies out there.

As for McKinley's performance, I still say the guy is the best field reporter 8 has. At least he doesn't come across as some deer-in-the-headlights or a Ted Baxter type.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom