• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

General Motors only after the consumer demands it ........ouch

It was stated:

In that other thread, you just posted that your had "heard" that iNiquity had received more funds, without providing a link, as proof. Using various search-engines, I have not been able to find, even a mention of any new funds.

Why should anyone be able to see something like that in a "link"? This is a private financial matter. iBiQuity is not {yet} a public company (although they sure would like to be!) so they have no obligation to release this as "news" to the masses.

I am sorry for the individuals who rely solely on "links" to provide "proof" of things that people report. What in the world did we do before we had "links"? And it certainly makes no difference if some folks here don't believe that iBiQuity has secured another influx of cash. The fact is, this DID happen regardless whether anyone here believes that it did or not.
 
Cal Stymes said:
It was stated:

In that other thread, you just posted that your had "heard" that iNiquity had received more funds, without providing a link, as proof. Using various search-engines, I have not been able to find, even a mention of any new funds.

Why should anyone be able to see something like that in a "link"? This is a private financial matter. iBiQuity is not {yet} a public company (although they sure would like to be!) so they have no obligation to release this as "news" to the masses.

I am sorry for the individuals who rely solely on "links" to provide "proof" of things that people report. What in the world did we do before we had "links"? And it certainly makes no difference if some folks here don't believe that iBiQuity has secured another influx of cash. The fact is, this DID happen regardless whether anyone here believes that it did or not.

Why, should anyone take your word for it - at least, with supporting links, there is proof/supporting documentation.
 
ONCE I will break my own rule {again}.

WHY would I report this if it weren't true? Does anyone here really think I enjoy making false statements? Obviously, I have it on very good authority. If I didn't have it on good authority, I wouldn't report it. And if I were to reveal my source, I would probably be hunted down and executed.

I'll say nothing more for fear of violating the moderator's sense of good taste and being edited.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom